胃排空异常能正常吗?

IF 1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ben Freiberg
{"title":"胃排空异常能正常吗?","authors":"Ben Freiberg","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.124.269182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging collaboratively wrote consensus statements to standardize gastric emptying scintigraphy. Despite this, centers are using nonstandard protocols. This study examined how these protocols contrast with standards. <b>Methods:</b> Consecutive charts were analyzed for meal, radionuclide dose, half-emptying time (T½) and its normal range, and documented retention and emptying. Impressions were compared with how emptying mapped on a graph based on standard 4-h values. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-four studies were identified. Ten of 14 abnormal studies were normal when plotted on the standard 4-h graph. Eight of 10 abnormal studies had normal 2- or 4-h retention. Normal T½ ranges varied significantly. Most altered the meal, and over 25% received a radionucleotide dose outside the recommended range. <b>Conclusion:</b> The upper bound of normal T½ falls within standard 4-h bounds, with many individuals given an erroneous impression. Though further optimization may be needed, adhering to standards is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":16548,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can an Abnormal Gastric Emptying Study Be Normal?\",\"authors\":\"Ben Freiberg\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnmt.124.269182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging collaboratively wrote consensus statements to standardize gastric emptying scintigraphy. Despite this, centers are using nonstandard protocols. This study examined how these protocols contrast with standards. <b>Methods:</b> Consecutive charts were analyzed for meal, radionuclide dose, half-emptying time (T½) and its normal range, and documented retention and emptying. Impressions were compared with how emptying mapped on a graph based on standard 4-h values. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-four studies were identified. Ten of 14 abnormal studies were normal when plotted on the standard 4-h graph. Eight of 10 abnormal studies had normal 2- or 4-h retention. Normal T½ ranges varied significantly. Most altered the meal, and over 25% received a radionucleotide dose outside the recommended range. <b>Conclusion:</b> The upper bound of normal T½ falls within standard 4-h bounds, with many individuals given an erroneous impression. Though further optimization may be needed, adhering to standards is critical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.124.269182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.124.269182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国神经胃肠病学和运动学会以及核医学和分子成像学会共同撰写了关于胃排空成像标准化的共识声明。尽管如此,各中心仍在使用非标准协议。本研究考察了这些协议与标准的对比。方法:分析连续图中膳食、放射性核素剂量、半排空时间(t1 / 2)及其正常范围,并记录留空和排空情况。将印象与基于标准4-h值的排空图进行比较。结果:确定了34项研究。在标准4小时图上绘制时,14个异常研究中有10个正常。10个异常研究中有8个有正常的2或4小时保留。正常t1 / 2范围差异显著。大多数人改变了饮食,超过25%的人接受了超出推荐范围的放射性核苷酸剂量。结论:正常t1 / 2的上限落在标准的4小时范围内,许多人给出了错误的印象。尽管可能需要进一步优化,但遵守标准至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can an Abnormal Gastric Emptying Study Be Normal?

The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging collaboratively wrote consensus statements to standardize gastric emptying scintigraphy. Despite this, centers are using nonstandard protocols. This study examined how these protocols contrast with standards. Methods: Consecutive charts were analyzed for meal, radionuclide dose, half-emptying time (T½) and its normal range, and documented retention and emptying. Impressions were compared with how emptying mapped on a graph based on standard 4-h values. Results: Thirty-four studies were identified. Ten of 14 abnormal studies were normal when plotted on the standard 4-h graph. Eight of 10 abnormal studies had normal 2- or 4-h retention. Normal T½ ranges varied significantly. Most altered the meal, and over 25% received a radionucleotide dose outside the recommended range. Conclusion: The upper bound of normal T½ falls within standard 4-h bounds, with many individuals given an erroneous impression. Though further optimization may be needed, adhering to standards is critical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of nuclear medicine technology
Journal of nuclear medicine technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信