在脂质纳米颗粒中使用新型赋形剂的行业前景-非临床考虑。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Lorrene A Buckley, Jessica E Sutherland, Prachi Borude, Karine Broudic, Philippe Collin, Aimee Hillegas, Chris MacLauchlin, Amer F Saleh, Amy Sharma, Justina Thomas, Matthew O'Brien Laramy
{"title":"在脂质纳米颗粒中使用新型赋形剂的行业前景-非临床考虑。","authors":"Lorrene A Buckley, Jessica E Sutherland, Prachi Borude, Karine Broudic, Philippe Collin, Aimee Hillegas, Chris MacLauchlin, Amer F Saleh, Amy Sharma, Justina Thomas, Matthew O'Brien Laramy","doi":"10.1177/10915818251320631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nucleic acid drug delivery with lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations has enabled the development of novel therapeutics and vaccines. LNP formulations are composed of both naturally occurring and synthetic lipid excipients. This perspective shares current practices in the nonclinical safety assessment of novel lipid excipients contained in LNP formulations and identifies gaps in current regulatory guidance on this topic. There is no globally harmonized regulatory guidance for the nonclinical safety assessment of novel excipients or guidance specific to safety testing of novel excipients in LNPs. Given the complexity of these LNP formulations, most nonclinical safety studies to support development are conducted with the drug product or with a LNP that contains non-active cargo. Three case studies (Onpattro<sup>®</sup>, Comirnaty<sup>®</sup>, and SpikeVax<sup>®</sup>) highlight that specific assessments may differ depending on the encapsulated modality, the intended use (e.g., therapeutic versus preventative vaccine), dose, and frequency of dosing. These case studies also suggest that regulatory agencies are open to scientific rationale to justify why certain tests should or should not be performed. As more products are approved, it will be important to understand how precedents set for approved products can be leveraged and what additional unique strategies may be applied to ensure nonclinical safety assessments are predictive, relevant, and meaningful for human safety. Proactive alignment with regulatory authorities will be critical in this context, especially as new approaches are proposed. Guidance documents may need to be revised or created as more experience is acquired to reflect the unique considerations for these novel excipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14432,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"10915818251320631"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Industry Perspective on the Use of Novel Excipients in Lipid Nanoparticles-Nonclinical Considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Lorrene A Buckley, Jessica E Sutherland, Prachi Borude, Karine Broudic, Philippe Collin, Aimee Hillegas, Chris MacLauchlin, Amer F Saleh, Amy Sharma, Justina Thomas, Matthew O'Brien Laramy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10915818251320631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nucleic acid drug delivery with lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations has enabled the development of novel therapeutics and vaccines. LNP formulations are composed of both naturally occurring and synthetic lipid excipients. This perspective shares current practices in the nonclinical safety assessment of novel lipid excipients contained in LNP formulations and identifies gaps in current regulatory guidance on this topic. There is no globally harmonized regulatory guidance for the nonclinical safety assessment of novel excipients or guidance specific to safety testing of novel excipients in LNPs. Given the complexity of these LNP formulations, most nonclinical safety studies to support development are conducted with the drug product or with a LNP that contains non-active cargo. Three case studies (Onpattro<sup>®</sup>, Comirnaty<sup>®</sup>, and SpikeVax<sup>®</sup>) highlight that specific assessments may differ depending on the encapsulated modality, the intended use (e.g., therapeutic versus preventative vaccine), dose, and frequency of dosing. These case studies also suggest that regulatory agencies are open to scientific rationale to justify why certain tests should or should not be performed. As more products are approved, it will be important to understand how precedents set for approved products can be leveraged and what additional unique strategies may be applied to ensure nonclinical safety assessments are predictive, relevant, and meaningful for human safety. Proactive alignment with regulatory authorities will be critical in this context, especially as new approaches are proposed. Guidance documents may need to be revised or created as more experience is acquired to reflect the unique considerations for these novel excipients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10915818251320631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10915818251320631\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10915818251320631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脂质纳米颗粒(LNP)制剂的核酸药物递送使新疗法和疫苗的发展成为可能。LNP配方由天然存在和合成脂质辅料组成。这一观点分享了LNP配方中含有的新型脂质赋形剂的非临床安全性评估的当前实践,并确定了当前关于该主题的监管指导中的空白。对于新辅料的非临床安全性评估,没有全球统一的监管指南,也没有针对LNPs中新辅料安全性测试的专门指南。考虑到这些LNP配方的复杂性,大多数支持开发的非临床安全性研究都是用药物产品或含有非活性货物的LNP进行的。三个案例研究(Onpattro®、Comirnaty®和SpikeVax®)强调,具体评估可能因胶囊化方式、预期用途(如治疗性与预防性疫苗)、剂量和给药频率而异。这些案例研究还表明,管理机构愿意接受科学依据,以证明为什么应该或不应该进行某些测试。随着越来越多的产品被批准,了解如何利用已批准产品的先例以及可以应用哪些额外的独特策略来确保非临床安全性评估对人类安全具有预测性、相关性和意义将变得非常重要。在这种情况下,主动与监管机构保持一致至关重要,尤其是在提出新方法的情况下。指导文件可能需要修改或创建,因为获得了更多的经验,以反映这些新型辅料的独特考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Industry Perspective on the Use of Novel Excipients in Lipid Nanoparticles-Nonclinical Considerations.

Nucleic acid drug delivery with lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations has enabled the development of novel therapeutics and vaccines. LNP formulations are composed of both naturally occurring and synthetic lipid excipients. This perspective shares current practices in the nonclinical safety assessment of novel lipid excipients contained in LNP formulations and identifies gaps in current regulatory guidance on this topic. There is no globally harmonized regulatory guidance for the nonclinical safety assessment of novel excipients or guidance specific to safety testing of novel excipients in LNPs. Given the complexity of these LNP formulations, most nonclinical safety studies to support development are conducted with the drug product or with a LNP that contains non-active cargo. Three case studies (Onpattro®, Comirnaty®, and SpikeVax®) highlight that specific assessments may differ depending on the encapsulated modality, the intended use (e.g., therapeutic versus preventative vaccine), dose, and frequency of dosing. These case studies also suggest that regulatory agencies are open to scientific rationale to justify why certain tests should or should not be performed. As more products are approved, it will be important to understand how precedents set for approved products can be leveraged and what additional unique strategies may be applied to ensure nonclinical safety assessments are predictive, relevant, and meaningful for human safety. Proactive alignment with regulatory authorities will be critical in this context, especially as new approaches are proposed. Guidance documents may need to be revised or created as more experience is acquired to reflect the unique considerations for these novel excipients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Toxicology publishes timely, peer-reviewed papers on current topics important to toxicologists. Six bi-monthly issues cover a wide range of topics, including contemporary issues in toxicology, safety assessments, novel approaches to toxicological testing, mechanisms of toxicity, biomarkers, and risk assessment. The Journal also publishes invited reviews on contemporary topics, and features articles based on symposia. In addition, supplemental issues are routinely published on various special topics, including three supplements devoted to contributions from the Cosmetic Review Expert Panel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信