稳定性白癜风的自体皮肤细胞悬浮液加光疗:来自美国经济模型的发现。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2475674
Jennifer Benner, Nicholas Adair, Brian Hitt, Vivien L Nguyen, Iltefat H Hamzavi, Matthew Sussman
{"title":"稳定性白癜风的自体皮肤细胞悬浮液加光疗:来自美国经济模型的发现。","authors":"Jennifer Benner, Nicholas Adair, Brian Hitt, Vivien L Nguyen, Iltefat H Hamzavi, Matthew Sussman","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2475674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A cell harvesting device for preparing non-cultured autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) at the point-of-care is FDA-approved for repigmentation of stable depigmented vitiligo lesions in patients 18 years and older. The pivotal RSVP trial showed ≥80% repigmentation at Week-24 in 36% of lesions treated with laser ablation, ASCS, and narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy compared to 0% with phototherapy alone (<i>p</i> = 0.012). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the potential economic impact of laser ablation plus ASCS with phototherapy versus phototherapy alone for repigmentation of stable vitiligo lesions from a US payer perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 5-year decision-tree model was developed reflecting clinical pathways of adults with stable vitiligo lesions who had an inadequate response to prior topicals and phototherapy. Patients entering the model were treated with ASCS plus phototherapy or phototherapy alone and assessed for treatment response at Weeks-24 and 52 based on the RSVP trial's effectiveness endpoints. Durable response for Year-2 onwards was proxied by melanocyte-keratinocyte transplantation data. Model outcomes included per-patient total and incremental healthcare costs, treatment costs and total costs, cost per-patient per-month (PPPM), and cost per-patient per-year (PPPY). One-way sensitivity analyses assessed model result robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative total per-patient cost for ASCS plus phototherapy increased from $28,177 to $92,779 between Year-1 and Year-5. Phototherapy alone increased from $21,146 to $101,518 over the same period. Compared to phototherapy alone, ASCS plus phototherapy incurred $7,030 more total per-patient cumulative costs in Year-1 and $8,738 less by Year-5 (-$146 PMPM; -$1,748 PPPY). Breakeven occurred between Years 2-3. Results were most sensitive to changes in ASCS response at Weeks-24 and 52 and healthcare costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among adults with stable vitiligo with prior inadequate response to topicals or phototherapy, ASCS treatment may lead to lower all-cause direct medical costs over 5 years compared to phototherapy alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"425-435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autologous skin cell suspension plus phototherapy in stable vitiligo: findings from a US economic model.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Benner, Nicholas Adair, Brian Hitt, Vivien L Nguyen, Iltefat H Hamzavi, Matthew Sussman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2025.2475674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A cell harvesting device for preparing non-cultured autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) at the point-of-care is FDA-approved for repigmentation of stable depigmented vitiligo lesions in patients 18 years and older. The pivotal RSVP trial showed ≥80% repigmentation at Week-24 in 36% of lesions treated with laser ablation, ASCS, and narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy compared to 0% with phototherapy alone (<i>p</i> = 0.012). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the potential economic impact of laser ablation plus ASCS with phototherapy versus phototherapy alone for repigmentation of stable vitiligo lesions from a US payer perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 5-year decision-tree model was developed reflecting clinical pathways of adults with stable vitiligo lesions who had an inadequate response to prior topicals and phototherapy. Patients entering the model were treated with ASCS plus phototherapy or phototherapy alone and assessed for treatment response at Weeks-24 and 52 based on the RSVP trial's effectiveness endpoints. Durable response for Year-2 onwards was proxied by melanocyte-keratinocyte transplantation data. Model outcomes included per-patient total and incremental healthcare costs, treatment costs and total costs, cost per-patient per-month (PPPM), and cost per-patient per-year (PPPY). One-way sensitivity analyses assessed model result robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative total per-patient cost for ASCS plus phototherapy increased from $28,177 to $92,779 between Year-1 and Year-5. Phototherapy alone increased from $21,146 to $101,518 over the same period. Compared to phototherapy alone, ASCS plus phototherapy incurred $7,030 more total per-patient cumulative costs in Year-1 and $8,738 less by Year-5 (-$146 PMPM; -$1,748 PPPY). Breakeven occurred between Years 2-3. Results were most sensitive to changes in ASCS response at Weeks-24 and 52 and healthcare costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among adults with stable vitiligo with prior inadequate response to topicals or phototherapy, ASCS treatment may lead to lower all-cause direct medical costs over 5 years compared to phototherapy alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"425-435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2475674\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2475674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一种用于在护理点制备非培养的自体皮肤细胞悬液(ASCS)的细胞收获装置被fda批准用于18岁及以上患者的稳定脱色性白癜风病变的再色素沉着。关键的RSVP试验显示,在第24周时,36%的病变接受激光消融、ASCS和窄带紫外B光疗治疗,而单独光疗治疗的这一比例为0% (p = 0.012)。本分析的目的是从美国支付者的角度评估激光消融+ ASCS与光疗相比单独光疗对稳定白癜风病变重新着色的潜在经济影响。方法:建立了一个5年决策树模型,反映了对既往局部治疗和光疗反应不足的稳定白癜风病变成人的临床路径。进入模型的患者接受ASCS +光疗或单独光疗治疗,并根据RSVP试验的有效性终点在第24周和第52周评估治疗反应。黑色素细胞-角化细胞移植数据表明,第2年以后的持久反应。模型结果包括每位患者总医疗保健费用和增量医疗保健费用、治疗费用和总费用、每位患者每月费用(PPPM)和每位患者每年费用(PPPY)。单向敏感性分析评估了模型结果的稳健性。结果:在第1年和第5年期间,ASCS加光疗的累计每位患者总费用从28,177美元增加到92,779美元。同期光疗费用从21,146美元增加到101,518美元。与单独光疗相比,ASCS +光疗在第一年每名患者的累计总费用增加了7,030美元,到第五年减少了8,738美元(- 146美元的PMPM;- 1748美元PPPY)。收支平衡发生在第2-3年之间。结果对第24周和第52周ASCS反应的变化和医疗费用最为敏感。结论:在之前对局部治疗或光疗反应不足的稳定型白癜风患者中,与单独光疗相比,ASCS治疗可能导致5年内全因直接医疗费用降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autologous skin cell suspension plus phototherapy in stable vitiligo: findings from a US economic model.

Introduction: A cell harvesting device for preparing non-cultured autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) at the point-of-care is FDA-approved for repigmentation of stable depigmented vitiligo lesions in patients 18 years and older. The pivotal RSVP trial showed ≥80% repigmentation at Week-24 in 36% of lesions treated with laser ablation, ASCS, and narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy compared to 0% with phototherapy alone (p = 0.012). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the potential economic impact of laser ablation plus ASCS with phototherapy versus phototherapy alone for repigmentation of stable vitiligo lesions from a US payer perspective.

Methods: A 5-year decision-tree model was developed reflecting clinical pathways of adults with stable vitiligo lesions who had an inadequate response to prior topicals and phototherapy. Patients entering the model were treated with ASCS plus phototherapy or phototherapy alone and assessed for treatment response at Weeks-24 and 52 based on the RSVP trial's effectiveness endpoints. Durable response for Year-2 onwards was proxied by melanocyte-keratinocyte transplantation data. Model outcomes included per-patient total and incremental healthcare costs, treatment costs and total costs, cost per-patient per-month (PPPM), and cost per-patient per-year (PPPY). One-way sensitivity analyses assessed model result robustness.

Results: The cumulative total per-patient cost for ASCS plus phototherapy increased from $28,177 to $92,779 between Year-1 and Year-5. Phototherapy alone increased from $21,146 to $101,518 over the same period. Compared to phototherapy alone, ASCS plus phototherapy incurred $7,030 more total per-patient cumulative costs in Year-1 and $8,738 less by Year-5 (-$146 PMPM; -$1,748 PPPY). Breakeven occurred between Years 2-3. Results were most sensitive to changes in ASCS response at Weeks-24 and 52 and healthcare costs.

Conclusion: Among adults with stable vitiligo with prior inadequate response to topicals or phototherapy, ASCS treatment may lead to lower all-cause direct medical costs over 5 years compared to phototherapy alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信