紫外光活化过硫酸盐体系中对乙酰氨基酚自由基和非自由基氧化降解:PDS和PMS的比较。

IF 2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Technology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1080/09593330.2025.2471048
Chenyang Song, Junfeng Li, Zhaoyang Wang, Lijuan Yi, Xi Xie, Wenhuai Wang, Qiong Feng, Zhiheng Cao
{"title":"紫外光活化过硫酸盐体系中对乙酰氨基酚自由基和非自由基氧化降解:PDS和PMS的比较。","authors":"Chenyang Song, Junfeng Li, Zhaoyang Wang, Lijuan Yi, Xi Xie, Wenhuai Wang, Qiong Feng, Zhiheng Cao","doi":"10.1080/09593330.2025.2471048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to differences in physical and chemical properties, peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and peroxydisulfate (PDS) show distinct reactivity under ultraviolet (UV) activation. Consequently, selecting the appropriate persulfate concentration is critical for optimising the degradation efficiency of the system. This study compared the degradation efficiency of acetaminophen (ACE) in UV light-activated PDS (UV/PDS) and PMS (UV/PMS) systems. Under optimal conditions ([ACE]<sub>0</sub> = 10 mg·L<sup>-1</sup>, UV light power = 6 W, [pH]<sub>0</sub> = 7), the ACE removal rate reached 97.8% within 60 min when the dosage of PDS was 8 mM. 91.7% within 60 min with 10 mM PMS in the UV/PMS system, and only 82.4% when the PMS dosage was 8 mM. Quenching experiments and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) analysis revealed that the UV/PDS system exhibited higher characteristic peak signal intensities for sulfate radical (<math><mi>S</mi><msubsup><mi>O</mi><mn>4</mn><mrow><mo>⋅</mo><mo>-</mo></mrow></msubsup></math>), superoxide radical (<math><msubsup><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn><mrow><mo>⋅</mo><mo>-</mo></mrow></msubsup></math>), singlet oxygen (<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>), and hydroxyl radical (<math><mi>OH</mi><mo>⋅</mo></math>) compared to the UV/PMS system. In the UV/PDS system, <math><mi>S</mi><msubsup><mi>O</mi><mn>4</mn><mrow><mo>⋅</mo><mo>-</mo></mrow></msubsup></math> and <sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub> were identified as the primary contributors to ACE removal, whereas <math><mi>S</mi><msubsup><mi>O</mi><mn>4</mn><mrow><mo>⋅</mo><mo>-</mo></mrow></msubsup></math> was the predominant species in the UV/PMS system. Moreover, the intermediate products generated during the UV/PDS reaction were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). This study demonstrated the feasibility of UV light-activated persulfate systems for ACE treatment, providing a systematic comparison of the performance and mechanisms of ACE degradation between the two systems. The findings offer valuable insights and practical guidance for selecting persulfates in UV light-activated research and applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12009,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology","volume":" ","pages":"3571-3588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radical and nonradical oxidative degradation of acetaminophen in ultraviolet light activated persulfate systems: comparison of PDS and PMS.\",\"authors\":\"Chenyang Song, Junfeng Li, Zhaoyang Wang, Lijuan Yi, Xi Xie, Wenhuai Wang, Qiong Feng, Zhiheng Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593330.2025.2471048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Due to differences in physical and chemical properties, peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and peroxydisulfate (PDS) show distinct reactivity under ultraviolet (UV) activation. Consequently, selecting the appropriate persulfate concentration is critical for optimising the degradation efficiency of the system. This study compared the degradation efficiency of acetaminophen (ACE) in UV light-activated PDS (UV/PDS) and PMS (UV/PMS) systems. Under optimal conditions ([ACE]<sub>0</sub> = 10 mg·L<sup>-1</sup>, UV light power = 6 W, [pH]<sub>0</sub> = 7), the ACE removal rate reached 97.8% within 60 min when the dosage of PDS was 8 mM. 91.7% within 60 min with 10 mM PMS in the UV/PMS system, and only 82.4% when the PMS dosage was 8 mM. Quenching experiments and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) analysis revealed that the UV/PDS system exhibited higher characteristic peak signal intensities for sulfate radical (<math><mi>S</mi><msubsup><mi>O</mi><mn>4</mn><mrow><mo>⋅</mo><mo>-</mo></mrow></msubsup></math>), superoxide radical (<math><msubsup><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn><mrow><mo>⋅</mo><mo>-</mo></mrow></msubsup></math>), singlet oxygen (<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>), and hydroxyl radical (<math><mi>OH</mi><mo>⋅</mo></math>) compared to the UV/PMS system. In the UV/PDS system, <math><mi>S</mi><msubsup><mi>O</mi><mn>4</mn><mrow><mo>⋅</mo><mo>-</mo></mrow></msubsup></math> and <sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub> were identified as the primary contributors to ACE removal, whereas <math><mi>S</mi><msubsup><mi>O</mi><mn>4</mn><mrow><mo>⋅</mo><mo>-</mo></mrow></msubsup></math> was the predominant species in the UV/PMS system. Moreover, the intermediate products generated during the UV/PDS reaction were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). This study demonstrated the feasibility of UV light-activated persulfate systems for ACE treatment, providing a systematic comparison of the performance and mechanisms of ACE degradation between the two systems. The findings offer valuable insights and practical guidance for selecting persulfates in UV light-activated research and applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3571-3588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2025.2471048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2025.2471048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于物理和化学性质的不同,过氧单硫酸盐(PMS)和过氧二硫酸盐(PDS)在紫外线(UV)活化下表现出不同的反应活性。因此,选择合适的过硫酸盐浓度是优化系统降解效率的关键。本研究比较了紫外光激活PDS (UV/PDS)和PMS (UV/PMS)体系对乙酰氨基酚(ACE)的降解效率。在最优条件下((ACE) 0 = 10 mg·l - 1,紫外线光功率= 6 W (pH) 0 = 7), ACE去除率达到97.8%在60分钟时的用量PDS是8毫米。91.7%在60分钟10毫米PMS紫外线/ PMS系统,经前综合症时,只有82.4%的剂量是8毫米。淬火实验和电子顺磁共振(EPR)分析显示,紫外线/ PDS系统表现出更高的特征峰信号强度为硫酸根(SO4⋅-),超氧化物激进(O2⋅-),单线态氧(1O2)和羟基自由基(OH⋅)。在UV/PDS系统中,SO4⋅-和1O2是ACE去除的主要贡献者,而在UV/PMS系统中,SO4⋅-是优势物质。采用液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS)分析了UV/PDS反应产生的中间产物。本研究证明了紫外光活化过硫酸盐体系处理ACE的可行性,并对两种体系降解ACE的性能和机理进行了系统比较。研究结果为过硫酸盐在紫外光活化研究和应用中的选择提供了有价值的见解和实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radical and nonradical oxidative degradation of acetaminophen in ultraviolet light activated persulfate systems: comparison of PDS and PMS.

Due to differences in physical and chemical properties, peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and peroxydisulfate (PDS) show distinct reactivity under ultraviolet (UV) activation. Consequently, selecting the appropriate persulfate concentration is critical for optimising the degradation efficiency of the system. This study compared the degradation efficiency of acetaminophen (ACE) in UV light-activated PDS (UV/PDS) and PMS (UV/PMS) systems. Under optimal conditions ([ACE]0 = 10 mg·L-1, UV light power = 6 W, [pH]0 = 7), the ACE removal rate reached 97.8% within 60 min when the dosage of PDS was 8 mM. 91.7% within 60 min with 10 mM PMS in the UV/PMS system, and only 82.4% when the PMS dosage was 8 mM. Quenching experiments and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) analysis revealed that the UV/PDS system exhibited higher characteristic peak signal intensities for sulfate radical (SO4-), superoxide radical (O2-), singlet oxygen (1O2), and hydroxyl radical (OH) compared to the UV/PMS system. In the UV/PDS system, SO4- and 1O2 were identified as the primary contributors to ACE removal, whereas SO4- was the predominant species in the UV/PMS system. Moreover, the intermediate products generated during the UV/PDS reaction were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). This study demonstrated the feasibility of UV light-activated persulfate systems for ACE treatment, providing a systematic comparison of the performance and mechanisms of ACE degradation between the two systems. The findings offer valuable insights and practical guidance for selecting persulfates in UV light-activated research and applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Technology
Environmental Technology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology is a leading journal for the rapid publication of science and technology papers on a wide range of topics in applied environmental studies, from environmental engineering to environmental biotechnology, the circular economy, municipal and industrial wastewater management, drinking-water treatment, air- and water-pollution control, solid-waste management, industrial hygiene and associated technologies. Environmental Technology is intended to provide rapid publication of new developments in environmental technology. The journal has an international readership with a broad scientific base. Contributions will be accepted from scientists and engineers in industry, government and universities. Accepted manuscripts are generally published within four months. Please note that Environmental Technology does not publish any review papers unless for a specified special issue which is decided by the Editor. Please do submit your review papers to our sister journal Environmental Technology Reviews at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tetr20/current
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信