沸石离子交换柱的氯再生,用于从炸药影响的采矿废水中去除氨。

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Roberto M Narbaitz, Grace O Akerele, Majid Sartaj, Jason Downey
{"title":"沸石离子交换柱的氯再生,用于从炸药影响的采矿废水中去除氨。","authors":"Roberto M Narbaitz, Grace O Akerele, Majid Sartaj, Jason Downey","doi":"10.1080/09593330.2025.2471043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Zeolite ion-exchange column system has been suggested as a viable option for the removal of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) from explosives-impacted mining wastewater (EIMWW) in cold regions. The objective of this bench-scale study was to compare the effectiveness of several NaOCl, NaOCl-NaCl and NaCl regeneration solutions on the performance of a zeolite column loaded with a synthetic EIMWW. The NaOCl experiments confirmed that effluent pH, total chlorine level, and free chlorine levels during the chlorine regeneration were positively related, thus indicating that ammonia is oxidized to nitrogen gas accompanied by production of hydrogen ions. This led to the regeneration of TAN-containing sites but it also regenerated sites containing K and Ca, this appears to be accomplished through the Na ions in the NaOCl solution and H<sup>+</sup> ions generated in the breakpoint chlorination reaction. The three regeneration schemes worked effectively, they did not significantly impact TAN uptakes and TAN selectivity. The NaOCl-NaCl regeneration scenario was superior to the NaOCl regenerations as it was faster and resulted in shorter low-pH periods that may damage the zeolite. And unlike the NaCl regeneration, the NaOCl-NaCl used regenerant was essentially TAN free, so it permits regenerant reuse and avoids creating a secondary waste stream. Thus, zeolite column treatment coupled with NaOCl-NaCl regeneration is a practical approach for the treatment of TAN-laden EIMWW.</p>","PeriodicalId":12009,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chlorine regeneration of a zeolite ion-exchange column for ammonia removal from an explosives-impacted mining wastewater.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto M Narbaitz, Grace O Akerele, Majid Sartaj, Jason Downey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593330.2025.2471043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Zeolite ion-exchange column system has been suggested as a viable option for the removal of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) from explosives-impacted mining wastewater (EIMWW) in cold regions. The objective of this bench-scale study was to compare the effectiveness of several NaOCl, NaOCl-NaCl and NaCl regeneration solutions on the performance of a zeolite column loaded with a synthetic EIMWW. The NaOCl experiments confirmed that effluent pH, total chlorine level, and free chlorine levels during the chlorine regeneration were positively related, thus indicating that ammonia is oxidized to nitrogen gas accompanied by production of hydrogen ions. This led to the regeneration of TAN-containing sites but it also regenerated sites containing K and Ca, this appears to be accomplished through the Na ions in the NaOCl solution and H<sup>+</sup> ions generated in the breakpoint chlorination reaction. The three regeneration schemes worked effectively, they did not significantly impact TAN uptakes and TAN selectivity. The NaOCl-NaCl regeneration scenario was superior to the NaOCl regenerations as it was faster and resulted in shorter low-pH periods that may damage the zeolite. And unlike the NaCl regeneration, the NaOCl-NaCl used regenerant was essentially TAN free, so it permits regenerant reuse and avoids creating a secondary waste stream. Thus, zeolite column treatment coupled with NaOCl-NaCl regeneration is a practical approach for the treatment of TAN-laden EIMWW.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2025.2471043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2025.2471043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

沸石离子交换柱系统被认为是去除寒冷地区炸药冲击采矿废水中总氨氮(TAN)的可行选择。本实验的目的是比较几种NaOCl、NaOCl-NaCl和NaCl再生溶液对负载合成EIMWW的沸石柱性能的影响。NaOCl实验证实,在氯再生过程中,出水pH、总氯水平和游离氯水平呈正相关,说明氨被氧化为氮气,同时产生氢离子。这导致了含tan位点的再生,但它也再生了含K和Ca的位点,这似乎是通过NaOCl溶液中的Na离子和断点氯化反应中产生的H+离子来完成的。三种再生方案均有效,对TAN的吸收和选择性无显著影响。NaOCl- nacl再生方案优于NaOCl再生方案,因为它更快,导致较短的可能损坏沸石的低ph期。与NaCl再生不同,NaOCl-NaCl使用的再生剂基本上不含TAN,因此它允许再生剂重复使用,避免产生二次废物流。因此,沸石柱处理结合NaOCl-NaCl再生是处理含tan的EIMWW的一种实用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chlorine regeneration of a zeolite ion-exchange column for ammonia removal from an explosives-impacted mining wastewater.

Zeolite ion-exchange column system has been suggested as a viable option for the removal of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) from explosives-impacted mining wastewater (EIMWW) in cold regions. The objective of this bench-scale study was to compare the effectiveness of several NaOCl, NaOCl-NaCl and NaCl regeneration solutions on the performance of a zeolite column loaded with a synthetic EIMWW. The NaOCl experiments confirmed that effluent pH, total chlorine level, and free chlorine levels during the chlorine regeneration were positively related, thus indicating that ammonia is oxidized to nitrogen gas accompanied by production of hydrogen ions. This led to the regeneration of TAN-containing sites but it also regenerated sites containing K and Ca, this appears to be accomplished through the Na ions in the NaOCl solution and H+ ions generated in the breakpoint chlorination reaction. The three regeneration schemes worked effectively, they did not significantly impact TAN uptakes and TAN selectivity. The NaOCl-NaCl regeneration scenario was superior to the NaOCl regenerations as it was faster and resulted in shorter low-pH periods that may damage the zeolite. And unlike the NaCl regeneration, the NaOCl-NaCl used regenerant was essentially TAN free, so it permits regenerant reuse and avoids creating a secondary waste stream. Thus, zeolite column treatment coupled with NaOCl-NaCl regeneration is a practical approach for the treatment of TAN-laden EIMWW.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Technology
Environmental Technology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology is a leading journal for the rapid publication of science and technology papers on a wide range of topics in applied environmental studies, from environmental engineering to environmental biotechnology, the circular economy, municipal and industrial wastewater management, drinking-water treatment, air- and water-pollution control, solid-waste management, industrial hygiene and associated technologies. Environmental Technology is intended to provide rapid publication of new developments in environmental technology. The journal has an international readership with a broad scientific base. Contributions will be accepted from scientists and engineers in industry, government and universities. Accepted manuscripts are generally published within four months. Please note that Environmental Technology does not publish any review papers unless for a specified special issue which is decided by the Editor. Please do submit your review papers to our sister journal Environmental Technology Reviews at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tetr20/current
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信