以信仰为基础的组织的癌症干预:范围审查。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Karen Hye-Cheon Kim Yeary, Jennifer D Allen, Elva Arredondo, Jamia Atemnkeng, Birnur Buzcu-Guven, Kelsey R Day, Elizabeth Dicarlo, Taynara Formagini, Simona C Kwon, Pearl McElfish, Lorna H McNeill, Robert L Newton, Crystal L Park, Sara Wilcox, Lovoria B Williams, Yousra Yusuf, Jamie Zoellner
{"title":"以信仰为基础的组织的癌症干预:范围审查。","authors":"Karen Hye-Cheon Kim Yeary, Jennifer D Allen, Elva Arredondo, Jamia Atemnkeng, Birnur Buzcu-Guven, Kelsey R Day, Elizabeth Dicarlo, Taynara Formagini, Simona C Kwon, Pearl McElfish, Lorna H McNeill, Robert L Newton, Crystal L Park, Sara Wilcox, Lovoria B Williams, Yousra Yusuf, Jamie Zoellner","doi":"10.1007/s10552-025-01977-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Faith-based organizations (FBOs) have been recognized as a critical partner to reach underserved, marginalized populations in the U.S. for disease prevention and health promotion. FBOs have been successfully engaged to lower risk for leading causes of death, including cancer, but despite the proliferation of FBO cancer intervention research, a comprehensive review is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a PRISMA Scoping Review to ascertain the impact of FBO cancer interventions. Seven bibliographical databases were used to search for articles evaluating cancer interventions reporting quantitative outcomes in which places of worship in the U.S. served as the research location. Study characteristics and results data were extracted by two independent extractors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six studies were included. All FBOs were Christian churches with healthy populations. Breast (25%), prostate (22%), and colorectal (17%) were the primary cancers targeted and cancer screening was the primary outcome of 75% of studies. Sixty-nine percent (k = 25) reported significant results in cancer-related outcomes from baseline to post-intervention follow-up, with 100% of studies in Korean American communities (k = 7) reporting significant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FBO interventions can successfully increase preventative screening across numerous cancer types in diverse communities, particularly in Korean Americans. Additional FBO cancer interventions that aim to reduce inequities in other cancers (e.g., lung) that disproportionately affect Korean Americans and have not been targeted are warranted. Expanding current investigations of FBO collaborations with other faiths (besides Christian) to include cancer prevention and control would further realize FBOs' untapped potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cancer interventions with faith-based organizations: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Hye-Cheon Kim Yeary, Jennifer D Allen, Elva Arredondo, Jamia Atemnkeng, Birnur Buzcu-Guven, Kelsey R Day, Elizabeth Dicarlo, Taynara Formagini, Simona C Kwon, Pearl McElfish, Lorna H McNeill, Robert L Newton, Crystal L Park, Sara Wilcox, Lovoria B Williams, Yousra Yusuf, Jamie Zoellner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10552-025-01977-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Faith-based organizations (FBOs) have been recognized as a critical partner to reach underserved, marginalized populations in the U.S. for disease prevention and health promotion. FBOs have been successfully engaged to lower risk for leading causes of death, including cancer, but despite the proliferation of FBO cancer intervention research, a comprehensive review is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a PRISMA Scoping Review to ascertain the impact of FBO cancer interventions. Seven bibliographical databases were used to search for articles evaluating cancer interventions reporting quantitative outcomes in which places of worship in the U.S. served as the research location. Study characteristics and results data were extracted by two independent extractors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six studies were included. All FBOs were Christian churches with healthy populations. Breast (25%), prostate (22%), and colorectal (17%) were the primary cancers targeted and cancer screening was the primary outcome of 75% of studies. Sixty-nine percent (k = 25) reported significant results in cancer-related outcomes from baseline to post-intervention follow-up, with 100% of studies in Korean American communities (k = 7) reporting significant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FBO interventions can successfully increase preventative screening across numerous cancer types in diverse communities, particularly in Korean Americans. Additional FBO cancer interventions that aim to reduce inequities in other cancers (e.g., lung) that disproportionately affect Korean Americans and have not been targeted are warranted. Expanding current investigations of FBO collaborations with other faiths (besides Christian) to include cancer prevention and control would further realize FBOs' untapped potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-025-01977-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-025-01977-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在美国,基于信仰的组织(FBOs)已被公认为服务不足、边缘化人群的重要合作伙伴,可用于疾病预防和健康促进。FBO已成功地降低了包括癌症在内的主要死亡原因的风险,但尽管FBO癌症干预研究的扩散,但缺乏全面的审查。方法:我们进行了一项PRISMA范围综述,以确定FBO癌症干预的影响。七个书目数据库被用来搜索评估癌症干预报告定量结果的文章,这些文章以美国的宗教场所为研究地点。研究特征和结果数据由两个独立的提取器提取。结果:纳入36项研究。所有的fbo都是拥有健康人群的基督教教堂。乳腺癌(25%)、前列腺癌(22%)和结肠直肠癌(17%)是主要的目标癌症,75%的研究的主要结果是癌症筛查。69% (k = 25)报告了从基线到干预后随访的癌症相关结果的显著性结果,其中100%的韩裔美国人社区研究(k = 7)报告了显著性结果。结论:FBO干预可以成功地增加不同社区中多种癌症类型的预防性筛查,特别是在韩裔美国人中。额外的FBO癌症干预措施旨在减少其他癌症(如肺癌)的不平等,这些癌症对韩裔美国人的影响不成比例,尚未成为目标。扩大目前FBO与其他信仰(除基督教外)合作的调查,包括癌症预防和控制,将进一步实现FBO未开发的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cancer interventions with faith-based organizations: a scoping review.

Purpose: Faith-based organizations (FBOs) have been recognized as a critical partner to reach underserved, marginalized populations in the U.S. for disease prevention and health promotion. FBOs have been successfully engaged to lower risk for leading causes of death, including cancer, but despite the proliferation of FBO cancer intervention research, a comprehensive review is lacking.

Methods: We conducted a PRISMA Scoping Review to ascertain the impact of FBO cancer interventions. Seven bibliographical databases were used to search for articles evaluating cancer interventions reporting quantitative outcomes in which places of worship in the U.S. served as the research location. Study characteristics and results data were extracted by two independent extractors.

Results: Thirty-six studies were included. All FBOs were Christian churches with healthy populations. Breast (25%), prostate (22%), and colorectal (17%) were the primary cancers targeted and cancer screening was the primary outcome of 75% of studies. Sixty-nine percent (k = 25) reported significant results in cancer-related outcomes from baseline to post-intervention follow-up, with 100% of studies in Korean American communities (k = 7) reporting significant results.

Conclusion: FBO interventions can successfully increase preventative screening across numerous cancer types in diverse communities, particularly in Korean Americans. Additional FBO cancer interventions that aim to reduce inequities in other cancers (e.g., lung) that disproportionately affect Korean Americans and have not been targeted are warranted. Expanding current investigations of FBO collaborations with other faiths (besides Christian) to include cancer prevention and control would further realize FBOs' untapped potential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
Cancer Causes & Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach. The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues. The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts. Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信