南非改善白血病管理和研究的优先设置:一项改进的德尔菲研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Rochelle Woudberg, Edina Sinanovic
{"title":"南非改善白血病管理和研究的优先设置:一项改进的德尔菲研究。","authors":"Rochelle Woudberg, Edina Sinanovic","doi":"10.1007/s10552-025-01979-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In resource-limited environments, setting priorities for leukemia care becomes essential to ensure effective and efficient use of available resources. This study aimed to identify the key areas of leukemia care and services by determining their prioritization within the South African healthcare system and developing a set of improvement and research priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-round modified Delphi method was used to identify leukemia care priorities and rank areas of leukemia management improvement and research priorities. Healthcare professional experts comprised of Clinical Hematologists and Hematopathologists. In round 1, participants independently rated the importance of 125 iterative statements on leukemia care and services derived from literature. In round 2, agreement within the expert participants was considered to finalize the list of priority statements and 17 improvement and research priorities were ranked based on level of importance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, a list of 67 priority statements reached consensus, and 17 improvement and research priorities were established. A high agreement (≥ 90%) was reached for 24 statements within the six themes, these included accurate and advanced diagnostic techniques, factors in determining treatment strategies (e.g., risk stratification), supportive care measures (e.g., pain management and infection prevention), ensuring adequate healthcare workforce, and creating multidisciplinary teams. The highest ranked improvement and research priorities were timely delivery of diagnosis and treatments and biomarker development for early detection, prognosis, and treatment response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified key priorities for leukemia care within the South African healthcare system, providing an evidence-based framework through expert consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Priority setting for improved leukemia management and research in South Africa: a modified Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Rochelle Woudberg, Edina Sinanovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10552-025-01979-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In resource-limited environments, setting priorities for leukemia care becomes essential to ensure effective and efficient use of available resources. This study aimed to identify the key areas of leukemia care and services by determining their prioritization within the South African healthcare system and developing a set of improvement and research priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-round modified Delphi method was used to identify leukemia care priorities and rank areas of leukemia management improvement and research priorities. Healthcare professional experts comprised of Clinical Hematologists and Hematopathologists. In round 1, participants independently rated the importance of 125 iterative statements on leukemia care and services derived from literature. In round 2, agreement within the expert participants was considered to finalize the list of priority statements and 17 improvement and research priorities were ranked based on level of importance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, a list of 67 priority statements reached consensus, and 17 improvement and research priorities were established. A high agreement (≥ 90%) was reached for 24 statements within the six themes, these included accurate and advanced diagnostic techniques, factors in determining treatment strategies (e.g., risk stratification), supportive care measures (e.g., pain management and infection prevention), ensuring adequate healthcare workforce, and creating multidisciplinary teams. The highest ranked improvement and research priorities were timely delivery of diagnosis and treatments and biomarker development for early detection, prognosis, and treatment response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified key priorities for leukemia care within the South African healthcare system, providing an evidence-based framework through expert consensus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-025-01979-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-025-01979-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在资源有限的环境中,确定白血病护理的优先事项对于确保有效和高效地利用现有资源至关重要。本研究旨在通过确定南非医疗保健系统内白血病护理和服务的优先次序,并制定一套改进和研究优先事项,从而确定白血病护理和服务的关键领域。方法:采用两轮修正德尔菲法确定白血病护理重点,并对白血病管理改进领域和研究重点进行排序。由临床血液学家和血液病理学家组成的医疗保健专业专家。在第1轮中,参与者独立评估了125个关于白血病护理和服务的反复陈述的重要性,这些陈述来自文献。在第二轮中,专家参与者之间的一致意见被认为最终确定了优先声明清单,并根据重要性对17个改进和研究优先事项进行了排名。结果:共有67个优先事项达成共识,并确定了17个改进和研究重点。在六个主题中,有24项声明达到了高度一致(≥90%),这些主题包括准确和先进的诊断技术,确定治疗策略的因素(例如,风险分层),支持性护理措施(例如,疼痛管理和感染预防),确保足够的医疗保健人力,以及创建多学科团队。排名最高的改进和研究重点是及时提供诊断和治疗,以及开发用于早期发现、预后和治疗反应的生物标志物。结论:本研究确定了南非医疗保健系统内白血病护理的关键优先事项,通过专家共识提供了一个基于证据的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Priority setting for improved leukemia management and research in South Africa: a modified Delphi study.

Purpose: In resource-limited environments, setting priorities for leukemia care becomes essential to ensure effective and efficient use of available resources. This study aimed to identify the key areas of leukemia care and services by determining their prioritization within the South African healthcare system and developing a set of improvement and research priorities.

Methods: A two-round modified Delphi method was used to identify leukemia care priorities and rank areas of leukemia management improvement and research priorities. Healthcare professional experts comprised of Clinical Hematologists and Hematopathologists. In round 1, participants independently rated the importance of 125 iterative statements on leukemia care and services derived from literature. In round 2, agreement within the expert participants was considered to finalize the list of priority statements and 17 improvement and research priorities were ranked based on level of importance.

Results: In total, a list of 67 priority statements reached consensus, and 17 improvement and research priorities were established. A high agreement (≥ 90%) was reached for 24 statements within the six themes, these included accurate and advanced diagnostic techniques, factors in determining treatment strategies (e.g., risk stratification), supportive care measures (e.g., pain management and infection prevention), ensuring adequate healthcare workforce, and creating multidisciplinary teams. The highest ranked improvement and research priorities were timely delivery of diagnosis and treatments and biomarker development for early detection, prognosis, and treatment response.

Conclusion: This study identified key priorities for leukemia care within the South African healthcare system, providing an evidence-based framework through expert consensus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
Cancer Causes & Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach. The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues. The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts. Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信