慢性疼痛患者功能恢复计划与传统医疗管理的临床效果:一项多中心回顾性观察分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Angela Giertych, Jessica Crane, Sarah Goozeé, Iris Maoz, Nader Mehri, Kasra Amirdelfan, Annu Navani
{"title":"慢性疼痛患者功能恢复计划与传统医疗管理的临床效果:一项多中心回顾性观察分析。","authors":"Angela Giertych, Jessica Crane, Sarah Goozeé, Iris Maoz, Nader Mehri, Kasra Amirdelfan, Annu Navani","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine clinical effectiveness of an 8-wk functional restoration program compared with conventional medical management in patients with chronic pain after work-related injury in the workers' compensation system.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is an observational retrospective chart review of 485 patients treated between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. Included patients with chronic pain after work-related injury who participated in a multidisciplinary evaluation and were considered appropriate for functional restoration program. Outcomes were analyzed for two groups: functional restoration program group completed an 8-wk program, and conventional medical management group did not receive functional restoration program treatment. The ordinary least squares regression model was used to control confounding factors, and an independent t test was performed to assess functional restoration program effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Functional restoration program graduates demonstrated improvements in depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, and physical function; Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale ( P <0.001), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale ( P < 0.01), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire ( P < 0.001), Neck Disability Index ( P < 0.001), and Oswestry Low Back Disability Index ( P < 0.001) scores were statistically significant compared to conventional medical management. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale and Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand scores did not show statistically significant improvement with functional restoration program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Functional restoration program offers a clinically effective treatment option to improve self-efficacy, anxiety, depression, and physical function in patients with chronic pain associated with work-related injury. Prospective, randomized control trials could be key in validating and identifying further variability in outcomes.</p><p><strong>To claim cme credits: </strong>Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.</p><p><strong>Cme objectives: </strong>Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: ○ Describe the benefits of a functional restoration program (FRP); ○ Provide additional options to improve function for patients with chronic pain associated with work-related injury; and ○ Enhance clinical applications of multidisciplinary treatment for treating delayed recovery from chronic pain in individuals with work-related injuries.</p><p><strong>Level: </strong>Advanced.</p><p><strong>Accreditation: </strong>The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"735-742"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Effectiveness of a Functional Restoration Program Compared to Conventional Medical Management in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Multicenter, Retrospective Observational Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Giertych, Jessica Crane, Sarah Goozeé, Iris Maoz, Nader Mehri, Kasra Amirdelfan, Annu Navani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine clinical effectiveness of an 8-wk functional restoration program compared with conventional medical management in patients with chronic pain after work-related injury in the workers' compensation system.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is an observational retrospective chart review of 485 patients treated between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. Included patients with chronic pain after work-related injury who participated in a multidisciplinary evaluation and were considered appropriate for functional restoration program. Outcomes were analyzed for two groups: functional restoration program group completed an 8-wk program, and conventional medical management group did not receive functional restoration program treatment. The ordinary least squares regression model was used to control confounding factors, and an independent t test was performed to assess functional restoration program effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Functional restoration program graduates demonstrated improvements in depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, and physical function; Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale ( P <0.001), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale ( P < 0.01), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire ( P < 0.001), Neck Disability Index ( P < 0.001), and Oswestry Low Back Disability Index ( P < 0.001) scores were statistically significant compared to conventional medical management. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale and Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand scores did not show statistically significant improvement with functional restoration program.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Functional restoration program offers a clinically effective treatment option to improve self-efficacy, anxiety, depression, and physical function in patients with chronic pain associated with work-related injury. Prospective, randomized control trials could be key in validating and identifying further variability in outcomes.</p><p><strong>To claim cme credits: </strong>Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.</p><p><strong>Cme objectives: </strong>Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: ○ Describe the benefits of a functional restoration program (FRP); ○ Provide additional options to improve function for patients with chronic pain associated with work-related injury; and ○ Enhance clinical applications of multidisciplinary treatment for treating delayed recovery from chronic pain in individuals with work-related injuries.</p><p><strong>Level: </strong>Advanced.</p><p><strong>Accreditation: </strong>The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"735-742\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002713\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002713","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较8周功能恢复计划(FRP)与常规医疗管理(CMM)对工伤后慢性疼痛患者的临床疗效。设计:对2020年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间接受治疗的485例患者进行观察性回顾性研究。纳入参加多学科评估并认为适合FRP治疗的工伤后慢性疼痛患者。结果分析两组:玻璃钢组完成了8周的计划,CMM组不接受玻璃钢治疗。采用普通最小二乘回归模型控制混杂因素,采用独立t检验评估FRP的有效性。结果:FRP毕业生在抑郁、焦虑、自我效能和身体功能方面表现出改善;CES-D(< 0.001)、GAD-7 (p < 0.01)、PSEQ (p < 0.001)、NDI (p < 0.001)、ODI (p < 0.001)评分与CMM比较,差异均有统计学意义。采用FRP后,LEFS和QuickDASH评分没有统计学上的显著改善。结论:玻璃钢为改善工伤慢性疼痛患者的自我效能、焦虑、抑郁和身体功能提供了一种临床有效的治疗选择。前瞻性、随机对照试验可能是验证和确定结果进一步变异性的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Effectiveness of a Functional Restoration Program Compared to Conventional Medical Management in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Multicenter, Retrospective Observational Analysis.

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine clinical effectiveness of an 8-wk functional restoration program compared with conventional medical management in patients with chronic pain after work-related injury in the workers' compensation system.

Design: This is an observational retrospective chart review of 485 patients treated between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. Included patients with chronic pain after work-related injury who participated in a multidisciplinary evaluation and were considered appropriate for functional restoration program. Outcomes were analyzed for two groups: functional restoration program group completed an 8-wk program, and conventional medical management group did not receive functional restoration program treatment. The ordinary least squares regression model was used to control confounding factors, and an independent t test was performed to assess functional restoration program effectiveness.

Results: Functional restoration program graduates demonstrated improvements in depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, and physical function; Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale ( P <0.001), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale ( P < 0.01), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire ( P < 0.001), Neck Disability Index ( P < 0.001), and Oswestry Low Back Disability Index ( P < 0.001) scores were statistically significant compared to conventional medical management. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale and Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand scores did not show statistically significant improvement with functional restoration program.

Conclusion: Functional restoration program offers a clinically effective treatment option to improve self-efficacy, anxiety, depression, and physical function in patients with chronic pain associated with work-related injury. Prospective, randomized control trials could be key in validating and identifying further variability in outcomes.

To claim cme credits: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.

Cme objectives: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: ○ Describe the benefits of a functional restoration program (FRP); ○ Provide additional options to improve function for patients with chronic pain associated with work-related injury; and ○ Enhance clinical applications of multidisciplinary treatment for treating delayed recovery from chronic pain in individuals with work-related injuries.

Level: Advanced.

Accreditation: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信