研究视觉、听觉和体感刺激组合对BOLD负性反应的一致性及其受任务需求水平的调节

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Wilf Nelson, Stephen D. Mayhew
{"title":"研究视觉、听觉和体感刺激组合对BOLD负性反应的一致性及其受任务需求水平的调节","authors":"Wilf Nelson,&nbsp;Stephen D. Mayhew","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Negative BOLD fMRI responses (NBR) occur commonly in sensory cortex and default mode network regions but remain poorly utilized as a marker of brain function due to an incomplete understanding. To better understand how NBR manifest across the brain, compare between different sensory stimuli and how they are modulated by changes in task demand, we recorded fMRI during trials of visual, auditory, or somatosensory stimulation, delivered either alone or in concurrent pairs. Twenty young-adult participants were cued to attend to a single modality and detect targets in each trial. We found that NBR were consistently induced in all non-task-relevant primary sensory cortices and default mode regions during all stimuli. NBR were observed within the stimulated modality, in the cortex ipsilateral to the stimulus; as well as cross-modal responses bilaterally within the cortex of an unstimulated sensory modality. The NBR regions showed high spatial overlap with the primary sensory positive BOLD response (PBR) of the stimulated modality. The NBR occurred in spatially comparable regions across different modality stimuli such that the peak voxel location and spatial extent were comparable between within and cross-modal NBRs. Some specific differences were seen, such as stronger magnitude sensorimotor NBR to somatosensory stimuli than to visual or auditory. No significant relationships were found between subjects' PBR and NBR magnitude, but significant linear correlations were observed between NBRs indicating that subjects with high magnitude NBR within one sensory modality also displayed high magnitude cross-modal NBR in a different modality. These findings suggest that cortical NBR are largely consistent between different sensory stimuli but also contain stimulus-specific variability in magnitude and spatial extent. Finally, positive BOLD responses were stronger to dual stimuli in all contralateral primary sensory regions, whilst NBR were slightly increased in specific regions of ipsilateral visual and sensorimotor cortex. This finding suggests a strong contribution to NBR from bottom-up stimulus input that was further modulated by attention during dual conditions and that NBR is driven by a combination of bottom-up and top-down influences whereby contributions to its generation arise from both feed-forward signals from subcortical or activated sensory regions and feedback mechanisms such as higher-level attentional control.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Consistency of Negative BOLD Responses to Combinations of Visual, Auditory, and Somatosensory Stimuli and Their Modulation by the Level of Task Demand\",\"authors\":\"Wilf Nelson,&nbsp;Stephen D. Mayhew\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.70177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Negative BOLD fMRI responses (NBR) occur commonly in sensory cortex and default mode network regions but remain poorly utilized as a marker of brain function due to an incomplete understanding. To better understand how NBR manifest across the brain, compare between different sensory stimuli and how they are modulated by changes in task demand, we recorded fMRI during trials of visual, auditory, or somatosensory stimulation, delivered either alone or in concurrent pairs. Twenty young-adult participants were cued to attend to a single modality and detect targets in each trial. We found that NBR were consistently induced in all non-task-relevant primary sensory cortices and default mode regions during all stimuli. NBR were observed within the stimulated modality, in the cortex ipsilateral to the stimulus; as well as cross-modal responses bilaterally within the cortex of an unstimulated sensory modality. The NBR regions showed high spatial overlap with the primary sensory positive BOLD response (PBR) of the stimulated modality. The NBR occurred in spatially comparable regions across different modality stimuli such that the peak voxel location and spatial extent were comparable between within and cross-modal NBRs. Some specific differences were seen, such as stronger magnitude sensorimotor NBR to somatosensory stimuli than to visual or auditory. No significant relationships were found between subjects' PBR and NBR magnitude, but significant linear correlations were observed between NBRs indicating that subjects with high magnitude NBR within one sensory modality also displayed high magnitude cross-modal NBR in a different modality. These findings suggest that cortical NBR are largely consistent between different sensory stimuli but also contain stimulus-specific variability in magnitude and spatial extent. Finally, positive BOLD responses were stronger to dual stimuli in all contralateral primary sensory regions, whilst NBR were slightly increased in specific regions of ipsilateral visual and sensorimotor cortex. This finding suggests a strong contribution to NBR from bottom-up stimulus input that was further modulated by attention during dual conditions and that NBR is driven by a combination of bottom-up and top-down influences whereby contributions to its generation arise from both feed-forward signals from subcortical or activated sensory regions and feedback mechanisms such as higher-level attentional control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70177\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70177\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

负的BOLD fMRI反应(NBR)通常发生在感觉皮层和默认模式网络区域,但由于不完整的理解,它仍然很少被用作脑功能的标记。为了更好地理解NBR是如何在大脑中表现出来的,比较不同的感觉刺激以及它们是如何被任务需求的变化所调节的,我们在视觉、听觉或体感刺激的试验中记录了功能磁共振成像(fMRI),这些刺激要么单独进行,要么同时成对进行。20名年轻的成年参与者被提示参加一个单一的模式,并在每个试验中检测目标。我们发现,NBR在所有非任务相关的初级感觉皮层和默认模式区域均被一致地诱导。在刺激模态中,在刺激同侧的皮层中观察到NBR;以及双侧非刺激感觉模态皮层内的跨模态反应。NBR区域与受刺激模态的初级感觉正BOLD反应(PBR)具有高度的空间重叠。NBR发生在不同模态刺激的空间可比性区域,因此在内模态和跨模态NBR之间,峰值体素位置和空间范围具有可比性。一些特定的差异被观察到,如感觉运动NBR对体感觉刺激比视觉或听觉刺激更强。被试的PBR与NBR强度之间没有显著的关系,但NBR之间存在显著的线性相关,这表明在一个感觉模态中具有高强度NBR的被试在另一个感觉模态中也表现出高强度的跨模态NBR。这些发现表明,皮层NBR在不同的感觉刺激之间基本一致,但在大小和空间范围上也包含刺激特异性变异。最后,在所有对侧初级感觉区,双刺激的阳性BOLD反应更强,而在同侧视觉和感觉运动皮层的特定区域,NBR略有增加。这一发现表明,自下而上的刺激输入对NBR有很大贡献,在双重条件下,这种输入受到注意的进一步调节,NBR是由自下而上和自上而下的影响共同驱动的,其中对NBR产生的贡献来自皮层下或激活的感觉区域的前馈信号和反馈机制,如更高水平的注意控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Investigating the Consistency of Negative BOLD Responses to Combinations of Visual, Auditory, and Somatosensory Stimuli and Their Modulation by the Level of Task Demand

Investigating the Consistency of Negative BOLD Responses to Combinations of Visual, Auditory, and Somatosensory Stimuli and Their Modulation by the Level of Task Demand

Negative BOLD fMRI responses (NBR) occur commonly in sensory cortex and default mode network regions but remain poorly utilized as a marker of brain function due to an incomplete understanding. To better understand how NBR manifest across the brain, compare between different sensory stimuli and how they are modulated by changes in task demand, we recorded fMRI during trials of visual, auditory, or somatosensory stimulation, delivered either alone or in concurrent pairs. Twenty young-adult participants were cued to attend to a single modality and detect targets in each trial. We found that NBR were consistently induced in all non-task-relevant primary sensory cortices and default mode regions during all stimuli. NBR were observed within the stimulated modality, in the cortex ipsilateral to the stimulus; as well as cross-modal responses bilaterally within the cortex of an unstimulated sensory modality. The NBR regions showed high spatial overlap with the primary sensory positive BOLD response (PBR) of the stimulated modality. The NBR occurred in spatially comparable regions across different modality stimuli such that the peak voxel location and spatial extent were comparable between within and cross-modal NBRs. Some specific differences were seen, such as stronger magnitude sensorimotor NBR to somatosensory stimuli than to visual or auditory. No significant relationships were found between subjects' PBR and NBR magnitude, but significant linear correlations were observed between NBRs indicating that subjects with high magnitude NBR within one sensory modality also displayed high magnitude cross-modal NBR in a different modality. These findings suggest that cortical NBR are largely consistent between different sensory stimuli but also contain stimulus-specific variability in magnitude and spatial extent. Finally, positive BOLD responses were stronger to dual stimuli in all contralateral primary sensory regions, whilst NBR were slightly increased in specific regions of ipsilateral visual and sensorimotor cortex. This finding suggests a strong contribution to NBR from bottom-up stimulus input that was further modulated by attention during dual conditions and that NBR is driven by a combination of bottom-up and top-down influences whereby contributions to its generation arise from both feed-forward signals from subcortical or activated sensory regions and feedback mechanisms such as higher-level attentional control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信