{"title":"降雨变率对黄土高原年化饲草-冬小麦集约化种植系统生产力和盈利能力的影响","authors":"Xingfa Lai, Dong An, Yuying Shen","doi":"10.1002/csc2.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intensifying traditional fallow–winter wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) (F–W) system with annual forage can increase productivity and profitability on the Loess Plateau of China. However, the uneven and variability precipitation has led to the productivity is instability. Four-cycles field experiment from 2016 to 2020 to investigate that planting oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.), soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> L. (Merr.)], and vetch (<i>Vicia sativa</i> L.) annual forages into summer fallow period on productivity, benefit, and resource use efficiency under R−30% (a 30% decrease in natural rainfall), CK (natural rainfall), and R+30% (a 30% increase in natural rainfall) three rainfall situations. Across four growing seasons with 12 rainfall situations, incorporating annual forages into fallow period significantly increased productivity and resource use efficiency, and the system productivity and net income were influenced by the intra- and interannual variability rainfall. Increasing precipitation significantly enhanced productivity. Compared to CK, the R+30% scenario wheat equivalent yields in F–W, oat–winter wheat (O–W), soybean–winter wheat (S–W), and vetch–winter wheat (V–W) systems were increased by 17.9%, 20.3%, 18.7%, and 25.5%, respectively. In normal years, forage oat, soybean, and vetch yields were 5545, 4339, and 2829 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The F–W, O–W, S–W, and V–W wheat grain yields were 3785, 3089, 4014, and 3286 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Compared to F–W, the S–W system net income increased by 30.5%, 33.3%, and 36.3%, respectively, under dry, normal, and wet years. In consideration of yield and profitability, the S–W system is more suitable for local farmers to wheat production under future climate change on the Loess Plateau.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"65 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of rainfall variability on productivity and profitability in the intensified annual forage–winter wheat cropping systems on the Loess Plateau of China\",\"authors\":\"Xingfa Lai, Dong An, Yuying Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/csc2.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Intensifying traditional fallow–winter wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) (F–W) system with annual forage can increase productivity and profitability on the Loess Plateau of China. However, the uneven and variability precipitation has led to the productivity is instability. Four-cycles field experiment from 2016 to 2020 to investigate that planting oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.), soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> L. (Merr.)], and vetch (<i>Vicia sativa</i> L.) annual forages into summer fallow period on productivity, benefit, and resource use efficiency under R−30% (a 30% decrease in natural rainfall), CK (natural rainfall), and R+30% (a 30% increase in natural rainfall) three rainfall situations. Across four growing seasons with 12 rainfall situations, incorporating annual forages into fallow period significantly increased productivity and resource use efficiency, and the system productivity and net income were influenced by the intra- and interannual variability rainfall. Increasing precipitation significantly enhanced productivity. Compared to CK, the R+30% scenario wheat equivalent yields in F–W, oat–winter wheat (O–W), soybean–winter wheat (S–W), and vetch–winter wheat (V–W) systems were increased by 17.9%, 20.3%, 18.7%, and 25.5%, respectively. In normal years, forage oat, soybean, and vetch yields were 5545, 4339, and 2829 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The F–W, O–W, S–W, and V–W wheat grain yields were 3785, 3089, 4014, and 3286 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Compared to F–W, the S–W system net income increased by 30.5%, 33.3%, and 36.3%, respectively, under dry, normal, and wet years. In consideration of yield and profitability, the S–W system is more suitable for local farmers to wheat production under future climate change on the Loess Plateau.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Science\",\"volume\":\"65 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.70006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.70006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
黄土高原传统休耕冬小麦(Triticum aestivum L., F-W)体系以年料强化可提高生产力和经济效益。然而,降水的不均匀性和变异性导致了生产力的不稳定性。2016 - 2020年四周期田间试验研究了在R - 30%(自然雨量减少30%)、CK(自然雨量增加30%)和R+30%(自然雨量增加30%)三种降雨情况下,夏季休耕期种植燕麦(Avena sativa L.)、大豆[Glycine max L. (Merr.)]和豇豆(Vicia sativa L.)一年生牧草的生产力、效益和资源利用效率。在4个生长季节12种降雨情况下,将年际牧草纳入休耕期显著提高了生产力和资源利用效率,且系统生产力和净收入受降雨年际和年际变率的影响。降水的增加显著提高了生产力。与对照相比,R+30%处理下F-W、燕麦-冬小麦(O-W)、大豆-冬小麦(S-W)和豌豆-冬小麦(V-W)体系的小麦当量产量分别提高了17.9%、20.3%、18.7%和25.5%。正常年份,饲草燕麦、大豆和野豌豆产量分别为5545、4339和2829 kg ha - 1。F-W型、O-W型、S-W型和V-W型小麦产量分别为3785、3089、4014和3286 kg ha - 1。与F-W相比,S-W系统在干旱、正常和潮湿年份的净收入分别增加了30.5%、33.3%和36.3%。考虑到产量和盈利能力,在未来气候变化的条件下,南西向制度更适合黄土高原当地农民种植小麦。
Effects of rainfall variability on productivity and profitability in the intensified annual forage–winter wheat cropping systems on the Loess Plateau of China
Intensifying traditional fallow–winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (F–W) system with annual forage can increase productivity and profitability on the Loess Plateau of China. However, the uneven and variability precipitation has led to the productivity is instability. Four-cycles field experiment from 2016 to 2020 to investigate that planting oat (Avena sativa L.), soybean [Glycine max L. (Merr.)], and vetch (Vicia sativa L.) annual forages into summer fallow period on productivity, benefit, and resource use efficiency under R−30% (a 30% decrease in natural rainfall), CK (natural rainfall), and R+30% (a 30% increase in natural rainfall) three rainfall situations. Across four growing seasons with 12 rainfall situations, incorporating annual forages into fallow period significantly increased productivity and resource use efficiency, and the system productivity and net income were influenced by the intra- and interannual variability rainfall. Increasing precipitation significantly enhanced productivity. Compared to CK, the R+30% scenario wheat equivalent yields in F–W, oat–winter wheat (O–W), soybean–winter wheat (S–W), and vetch–winter wheat (V–W) systems were increased by 17.9%, 20.3%, 18.7%, and 25.5%, respectively. In normal years, forage oat, soybean, and vetch yields were 5545, 4339, and 2829 kg ha−1, respectively. The F–W, O–W, S–W, and V–W wheat grain yields were 3785, 3089, 4014, and 3286 kg ha−1, respectively. Compared to F–W, the S–W system net income increased by 30.5%, 33.3%, and 36.3%, respectively, under dry, normal, and wet years. In consideration of yield and profitability, the S–W system is more suitable for local farmers to wheat production under future climate change on the Loess Plateau.
期刊介绍:
Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.