Alexandre Soares Ferreira Junior, Morgana Pinheiro Maux Lessa, Kate Sanborn, Alexander Gordee, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Matthew S. Karafin, Oluwatoyosi A. Onwuemene
{"title":"建立一种预测接受血浆置换治疗的住院患者大出血的模型","authors":"Alexandre Soares Ferreira Junior, Morgana Pinheiro Maux Lessa, Kate Sanborn, Alexander Gordee, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Matthew S. Karafin, Oluwatoyosi A. Onwuemene","doi":"10.1002/jca.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Although therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) can be associated with bleeding, there are currently no known strategies to reliably predict bleeding risk. This study developed a TPE bleeding risk prediction model for hospitalized patients. To develop the prediction model, we undertook a secondary analysis of public use files from the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III. First, we used a literature review to identify potential predictors. Second, we used Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations to impute variables with < 30% missing data. Third, we performed a 10-fold Cross-Validated Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator to optimize variable selection. Finally, we fitted a logistic regression model. The model identified 10 unique predictors and seven interactions. Among those with the highest odds ratios (OR) were the following: > 10 TPE procedures and antiplatelet agents (OR 3.26); nephrogenic systemic sclerosis (OR 3.15); and intensive care unit stay (OR 3.08). Among those with the lowest OR were the following: albumin-only TPE (OR 0.50); male sex (OR 0.82); and heart failure (OR 0.85). The model indicated an acceptable performance with a C-statistic of 0.71 (95% CI 0.699–0.717). A model to predict bleeding risk among hospitalized patients undergoing TPE identified key predictors and interactions. Although the model achieved acceptable performance, future studies are needed to validate and operationalize it.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing A Model to Predict Major Bleeding Among Hospitalized Patients Undergoing Therapeutic Plasma Exchange\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Soares Ferreira Junior, Morgana Pinheiro Maux Lessa, Kate Sanborn, Alexander Gordee, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Matthew S. Karafin, Oluwatoyosi A. Onwuemene\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jca.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Although therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) can be associated with bleeding, there are currently no known strategies to reliably predict bleeding risk. This study developed a TPE bleeding risk prediction model for hospitalized patients. To develop the prediction model, we undertook a secondary analysis of public use files from the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III. First, we used a literature review to identify potential predictors. Second, we used Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations to impute variables with < 30% missing data. Third, we performed a 10-fold Cross-Validated Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator to optimize variable selection. Finally, we fitted a logistic regression model. The model identified 10 unique predictors and seven interactions. Among those with the highest odds ratios (OR) were the following: > 10 TPE procedures and antiplatelet agents (OR 3.26); nephrogenic systemic sclerosis (OR 3.15); and intensive care unit stay (OR 3.08). Among those with the lowest OR were the following: albumin-only TPE (OR 0.50); male sex (OR 0.82); and heart failure (OR 0.85). The model indicated an acceptable performance with a C-statistic of 0.71 (95% CI 0.699–0.717). A model to predict bleeding risk among hospitalized patients undergoing TPE identified key predictors and interactions. Although the model achieved acceptable performance, future studies are needed to validate and operationalize it.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然治疗性血浆置换(TPE)可能与出血有关,但目前还没有已知的可靠预测出血风险的策略。本研究建立住院患者TPE出血风险预测模型。为了建立预测模型,我们对来自受体流行病学和供体评估研究iii的公共使用文件进行了二次分析。首先,我们使用文献综述来确定潜在的预测因素。其次,我们使用链接方程的多重Imputation来推算具有30%缺失数据的变量。第三,我们执行了10倍交叉验证的最小绝对收缩和选择算子来优化变量选择。最后,我们拟合了一个逻辑回归模型。该模型确定了10个独特的预测因子和7个相互作用。比值比(OR)最高的是:10例TPE手术和抗血小板药物(OR为3.26);肾源性系统性硬化症(OR 3.15);重症监护病房住院(OR 3.08)。OR最低的患者有:纯白蛋白TPE (OR 0.50);男性(OR 0.82);和心力衰竭(OR 0.85)。该模型的c统计量为0.71 (95% CI 0.699-0.717),显示出可接受的性能。一个预测TPE住院患者出血风险的模型确定了关键预测因素和相互作用。虽然该模型达到了可接受的性能,但需要进一步的研究来验证和操作它。
Developing A Model to Predict Major Bleeding Among Hospitalized Patients Undergoing Therapeutic Plasma Exchange
Although therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) can be associated with bleeding, there are currently no known strategies to reliably predict bleeding risk. This study developed a TPE bleeding risk prediction model for hospitalized patients. To develop the prediction model, we undertook a secondary analysis of public use files from the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III. First, we used a literature review to identify potential predictors. Second, we used Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations to impute variables with < 30% missing data. Third, we performed a 10-fold Cross-Validated Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator to optimize variable selection. Finally, we fitted a logistic regression model. The model identified 10 unique predictors and seven interactions. Among those with the highest odds ratios (OR) were the following: > 10 TPE procedures and antiplatelet agents (OR 3.26); nephrogenic systemic sclerosis (OR 3.15); and intensive care unit stay (OR 3.08). Among those with the lowest OR were the following: albumin-only TPE (OR 0.50); male sex (OR 0.82); and heart failure (OR 0.85). The model indicated an acceptable performance with a C-statistic of 0.71 (95% CI 0.699–0.717). A model to predict bleeding risk among hospitalized patients undergoing TPE identified key predictors and interactions. Although the model achieved acceptable performance, future studies are needed to validate and operationalize it.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.