{"title":"常规吸烟者和非吸烟者的隔膜厚度和身体表现:一项初步研究","authors":"Bahar Özgül, Zübeyir Sarı, İlkşan Demirbüken, Hilal Başak Can, Zana Gezer, Halil Yıldırım, Mine Gülden Polat","doi":"10.1111/cpf.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the understanding of the role of diaphragm role as a crucial element in trunk stabilizer performance, limited research has been carried out on the diaphragmatic features particularly in smoking population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>It was aimed to compare the diaphragm structure beside trunk stabilizer performance & body balance of young regular smokers and non-smokers and investigate the relationship between diaphragmatic features and physical performance in regular smokers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Asymptomatic regular smoker (<i>n</i> = 22) and nonsmoker (<i>n</i> = 22) young male subjects (21.63 ± 2.37 years) were participated to the study. The diaphragmatic ultrasonic scanning and physical performance tests of core muscle strength and endurance & Y balance test were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The duration of prone and lateral side bridge (<i>t</i> = −3.347, <i>t</i> = 3.477, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and modify push-up test repetition (<i>Z</i> = −2.213, <i>p</i> = 0.027) were detected lower in regular smokers. A positive moderate correlation was observed between the duration of the prone bridge test and the maximum inspiration thickness & the thickness difference at inspiration and expiration (<i>r</i> = 0.545, <i>p</i> = 0.009 & <i>r</i> = 0.468, <i>p</i> = 0.028) and between the number of repetitions of the modify push-up and the maximum expiration thickness (<i>r</i> = 0.530, <i>p</i> = 0.011).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While no difference was detected in terms of the diaphragm structure between groups, trunk stabilizer performance was lower and greater diaphragm thickness was associated with better trunk stability in some performance tasks in smokers. While the diaphragm muscle structure, which is the main respiratory muscle, does not differ in young smokers, the effects of the diaphragm muscle on general body biomechanics have been preliminary demonstrated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diaphragm thickness and physical performance in regular smokers and non-smokers: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Bahar Özgül, Zübeyir Sarı, İlkşan Demirbüken, Hilal Başak Can, Zana Gezer, Halil Yıldırım, Mine Gülden Polat\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cpf.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite the understanding of the role of diaphragm role as a crucial element in trunk stabilizer performance, limited research has been carried out on the diaphragmatic features particularly in smoking population.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>It was aimed to compare the diaphragm structure beside trunk stabilizer performance & body balance of young regular smokers and non-smokers and investigate the relationship between diaphragmatic features and physical performance in regular smokers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Asymptomatic regular smoker (<i>n</i> = 22) and nonsmoker (<i>n</i> = 22) young male subjects (21.63 ± 2.37 years) were participated to the study. The diaphragmatic ultrasonic scanning and physical performance tests of core muscle strength and endurance & Y balance test were performed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The duration of prone and lateral side bridge (<i>t</i> = −3.347, <i>t</i> = 3.477, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and modify push-up test repetition (<i>Z</i> = −2.213, <i>p</i> = 0.027) were detected lower in regular smokers. A positive moderate correlation was observed between the duration of the prone bridge test and the maximum inspiration thickness & the thickness difference at inspiration and expiration (<i>r</i> = 0.545, <i>p</i> = 0.009 & <i>r</i> = 0.468, <i>p</i> = 0.028) and between the number of repetitions of the modify push-up and the maximum expiration thickness (<i>r</i> = 0.530, <i>p</i> = 0.011).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>While no difference was detected in terms of the diaphragm structure between groups, trunk stabilizer performance was lower and greater diaphragm thickness was associated with better trunk stability in some performance tasks in smokers. While the diaphragm muscle structure, which is the main respiratory muscle, does not differ in young smokers, the effects of the diaphragm muscle on general body biomechanics have been preliminary demonstrated.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.70003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管人们已经认识到横隔膜在躯干稳定器性能中的关键作用,但对横隔膜特征的研究有限,特别是在吸烟人群中。目的比较尾翼侧横隔膜结构的性能;年轻吸烟者和非吸烟者的身体平衡,研究吸烟者膈肌特征与身体表现之间的关系。方法选取年龄(21.63±2.37)岁的无症状经常吸烟者(n = 22)和不吸烟者(n = 22)为研究对象。横膈膜超声扫描与核心肌力量耐力体能测试进行Y平衡试验。结果常规吸烟者俯卧桥和侧卧桥持续时间(t = - 3.347, t = 3.477, p < 0.001)和改良俯卧撑重复次数(Z = - 2.213, p = 0.027)明显低于常规吸烟者。俯卧桥试验持续时间与最大吸气厚度呈中等正相关;吸气和呼气时的厚度差(r = 0.545, p = 0.009;R = 0.468, p = 0.028),修改俯卧撑重复次数与最大呼气厚度之间的关系(R = 0.530, p = 0.011)。结论抽烟者在某些表演任务中躯干稳定器的性能较低,而在膈膜厚度较大的情况下躯干稳定性较好。虽然作为主要呼吸肌的横膈肌结构在年轻吸烟者中没有差异,但横膈肌对全身生物力学的影响已经初步得到证实。
Diaphragm thickness and physical performance in regular smokers and non-smokers: A pilot study
Background
Despite the understanding of the role of diaphragm role as a crucial element in trunk stabilizer performance, limited research has been carried out on the diaphragmatic features particularly in smoking population.
Objectives
It was aimed to compare the diaphragm structure beside trunk stabilizer performance & body balance of young regular smokers and non-smokers and investigate the relationship between diaphragmatic features and physical performance in regular smokers.
Methods
Asymptomatic regular smoker (n = 22) and nonsmoker (n = 22) young male subjects (21.63 ± 2.37 years) were participated to the study. The diaphragmatic ultrasonic scanning and physical performance tests of core muscle strength and endurance & Y balance test were performed.
Results
The duration of prone and lateral side bridge (t = −3.347, t = 3.477, p < 0.001), and modify push-up test repetition (Z = −2.213, p = 0.027) were detected lower in regular smokers. A positive moderate correlation was observed between the duration of the prone bridge test and the maximum inspiration thickness & the thickness difference at inspiration and expiration (r = 0.545, p = 0.009 & r = 0.468, p = 0.028) and between the number of repetitions of the modify push-up and the maximum expiration thickness (r = 0.530, p = 0.011).
Conclusion
While no difference was detected in terms of the diaphragm structure between groups, trunk stabilizer performance was lower and greater diaphragm thickness was associated with better trunk stability in some performance tasks in smokers. While the diaphragm muscle structure, which is the main respiratory muscle, does not differ in young smokers, the effects of the diaphragm muscle on general body biomechanics have been preliminary demonstrated.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest.
Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.