Bethany Blakely, Caitlin E. Moore, Taylor L. Pederson, Christy D. Gibson, Michael C. Benson, Evan Dracup, Carl J. Bernacchi
{"title":"生物能源原料的气候强迫:来自碳和能量通量测量的见解","authors":"Bethany Blakely, Caitlin E. Moore, Taylor L. Pederson, Christy D. Gibson, Michael C. Benson, Evan Dracup, Carl J. Bernacchi","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bioenergy from biofuels has the potential to slow growing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations by reducing fossil fuel use. However, growing bioenergy feedstocks is a land-intensive process. In the United States, the recent expansion of maize bioethanol has presented some environmental costs, prompting the development of several alternative bioenergy feedstocks. These feedstocks, selected in part for traits associated with ecosystem services, may provide opportunities for environmental benefits beyond fossil fuel displacement. We hypothesized that these bioenergy ecosystems will provide direct climatic cooling through their influence on carbon and radiative energy fluxes (i.e., through albedo). To test this hypothesis, we investigated the potential cooling effect of five current or potential bioenergy feedstocks using multi-year records from eddy covariance towers. Perennial feedstocks were carbon sinks, with an annual mean net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) of −2.7 ± 2.1 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> for miscanthus, −0.8 ± 1.1 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> for switchgrass, and −1.4 ± 0.7 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> for prairie. In contrast, annual rotations were generally carbon sources, with an annual mean NECB of 2.6 ± 2.4 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> for maize-soy and 3.2 ± 2.1 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> for sorghum-soy. Using maize-soy as a baseline, conversion to alternative feedstocks increased albedo, inducing further cooling. This effect was strongest for miscanthus, with −3.5 ± 2.0 W m<sup>−2</sup> of radiative forcing, and weakest for sorghum, with −1.4 ± 1.4 W m<sup>−2</sup>. When feedstock effects on carbon and albedo were compared using carbon equivalents, carbon fluxes were the stronger ecosystem effect, underscoring the role of perennial species as effective carbon sinks. This work highlights the impact of feedstock choice on ecosystem processes as an element of bioenergy land conversion strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements\",\"authors\":\"Bethany Blakely, Caitlin E. Moore, Taylor L. Pederson, Christy D. Gibson, Michael C. Benson, Evan Dracup, Carl J. Bernacchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bioenergy from biofuels has the potential to slow growing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations by reducing fossil fuel use. However, growing bioenergy feedstocks is a land-intensive process. In the United States, the recent expansion of maize bioethanol has presented some environmental costs, prompting the development of several alternative bioenergy feedstocks. These feedstocks, selected in part for traits associated with ecosystem services, may provide opportunities for environmental benefits beyond fossil fuel displacement. We hypothesized that these bioenergy ecosystems will provide direct climatic cooling through their influence on carbon and radiative energy fluxes (i.e., through albedo). To test this hypothesis, we investigated the potential cooling effect of five current or potential bioenergy feedstocks using multi-year records from eddy covariance towers. Perennial feedstocks were carbon sinks, with an annual mean net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) of −2.7 ± 2.1 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> for miscanthus, −0.8 ± 1.1 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> for switchgrass, and −1.4 ± 0.7 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> for prairie. In contrast, annual rotations were generally carbon sources, with an annual mean NECB of 2.6 ± 2.4 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> for maize-soy and 3.2 ± 2.1 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> for sorghum-soy. Using maize-soy as a baseline, conversion to alternative feedstocks increased albedo, inducing further cooling. This effect was strongest for miscanthus, with −3.5 ± 2.0 W m<sup>−2</sup> of radiative forcing, and weakest for sorghum, with −1.4 ± 1.4 W m<sup>−2</sup>. When feedstock effects on carbon and albedo were compared using carbon equivalents, carbon fluxes were the stronger ecosystem effect, underscoring the role of perennial species as effective carbon sinks. This work highlights the impact of feedstock choice on ecosystem processes as an element of bioenergy land conversion strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70026\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
来自生物燃料的生物能源有可能通过减少化石燃料的使用来减缓大气中二氧化碳浓度的增长。然而,种植生物能源原料是一个土地密集型的过程。在美国,最近玉米生物乙醇的扩张带来了一些环境成本,促使了几种替代生物能源原料的发展。这些原料在一定程度上是因为与生态系统服务相关的特性而被选择的,它们可能提供替代化石燃料以外的环境效益机会。我们假设这些生物能源生态系统将通过其对碳和辐射能通量的影响(即通过反照率)提供直接的气候冷却。为了验证这一假设,我们使用涡旋相关塔的多年记录调查了五种当前或潜在生物能源原料的潜在冷却效果。多年生原料是碳汇,芒草年平均净生态系统碳平衡(NECB)为−2.7±2.1 Mg C ha−1,柳枝稷为−0.8±1.1 Mg C ha−1,草原为−1.4±0.7 Mg C ha−1。玉米-大豆的年平均NECB为2.6±2.4 Mg C ha - 1,高粱-大豆的年平均NECB为3.2±2.1 Mg C ha - 1。以玉米-大豆为基准,转换为替代原料会增加反照率,导致进一步降温。这种效应在芒草中最强,为- 3.5±2.0 W m−2,在高粱中最弱,为- 1.4±1.4 W m−2。当利用碳当量比较原料对碳和反照率的影响时,碳通量是更强的生态系统效应,强调了多年生物种作为有效碳汇的作用。这项工作强调了原料选择对生态系统过程的影响,作为生物能源土地转换战略的一个要素。
Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements
Bioenergy from biofuels has the potential to slow growing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations by reducing fossil fuel use. However, growing bioenergy feedstocks is a land-intensive process. In the United States, the recent expansion of maize bioethanol has presented some environmental costs, prompting the development of several alternative bioenergy feedstocks. These feedstocks, selected in part for traits associated with ecosystem services, may provide opportunities for environmental benefits beyond fossil fuel displacement. We hypothesized that these bioenergy ecosystems will provide direct climatic cooling through their influence on carbon and radiative energy fluxes (i.e., through albedo). To test this hypothesis, we investigated the potential cooling effect of five current or potential bioenergy feedstocks using multi-year records from eddy covariance towers. Perennial feedstocks were carbon sinks, with an annual mean net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) of −2.7 ± 2.1 Mg C ha−1 for miscanthus, −0.8 ± 1.1 Mg C ha−1 for switchgrass, and −1.4 ± 0.7 Mg C ha−1 for prairie. In contrast, annual rotations were generally carbon sources, with an annual mean NECB of 2.6 ± 2.4 Mg C ha−1 for maize-soy and 3.2 ± 2.1 Mg C ha−1 for sorghum-soy. Using maize-soy as a baseline, conversion to alternative feedstocks increased albedo, inducing further cooling. This effect was strongest for miscanthus, with −3.5 ± 2.0 W m−2 of radiative forcing, and weakest for sorghum, with −1.4 ± 1.4 W m−2. When feedstock effects on carbon and albedo were compared using carbon equivalents, carbon fluxes were the stronger ecosystem effect, underscoring the role of perennial species as effective carbon sinks. This work highlights the impact of feedstock choice on ecosystem processes as an element of bioenergy land conversion strategies.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.