成人疫苗联合使用是安全、有效和可接受的:文献调查结果

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Litjen Tan, L.J, Dana Trevas, Ann R. Falsey
{"title":"成人疫苗联合使用是安全、有效和可接受的:文献调查结果","authors":"Litjen Tan,&nbsp;L.J,&nbsp;Dana Trevas,&nbsp;Ann R. Falsey","doi":"10.1111/irv.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Coadministration of vaccines in children is a long-standing practice that has proven to be safe and effective in improving the efficiency of vaccine administration, thereby increasing immunization coverage rates. As the number of vaccines routinely recommended for adults increases, and with limited opportunities for adults to have preventive health touchpoints with providers, adult vaccine coadministration should be considered as a routine practice to improve vaccination coverage rates and public health. A review of existing literature was conducted to examine the potential reactogenicity and impact on effectiveness when co-administering vaccines to adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Medline was searched for research articles with the search term “influenza vaccine” or “vaccination,” combined with the search terms “simultaneous,” “concomitant,” “concurrent,” and “combination.” Another search of Medline was conducted on the search term “influenza vaccine” or “vaccination” combined with the following individual search terms: “RSV,” “COVID,” and “Tdap.” The references of extracted articles were also examined for potential other relevant articles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Adult vaccine coadministration is safe for all the combinations we assessed. Most adverse events (AEs) were generally mild to moderate and of short duration. Some studies showed slightly more reactogenicity with coadministration but few or no serious AEs or safety signals. Nearly every study confirmed that coadministration had no significant effect on immune response for either vaccine. The benefits of vaccine coadministration outweigh the risks. It increases convenience for vaccinees, reduces the number of missed opportunities to vaccinate, and contributes to efficient use of healthcare resources.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13544,"journal":{"name":"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irv.70090","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adult Vaccine Coadministration Is Safe, Effective, and Acceptable: Results of a Survey of the Literature\",\"authors\":\"Litjen Tan,&nbsp;L.J,&nbsp;Dana Trevas,&nbsp;Ann R. Falsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/irv.70090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Coadministration of vaccines in children is a long-standing practice that has proven to be safe and effective in improving the efficiency of vaccine administration, thereby increasing immunization coverage rates. As the number of vaccines routinely recommended for adults increases, and with limited opportunities for adults to have preventive health touchpoints with providers, adult vaccine coadministration should be considered as a routine practice to improve vaccination coverage rates and public health. A review of existing literature was conducted to examine the potential reactogenicity and impact on effectiveness when co-administering vaccines to adults.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Medline was searched for research articles with the search term “influenza vaccine” or “vaccination,” combined with the search terms “simultaneous,” “concomitant,” “concurrent,” and “combination.” Another search of Medline was conducted on the search term “influenza vaccine” or “vaccination” combined with the following individual search terms: “RSV,” “COVID,” and “Tdap.” The references of extracted articles were also examined for potential other relevant articles.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adult vaccine coadministration is safe for all the combinations we assessed. Most adverse events (AEs) were generally mild to moderate and of short duration. Some studies showed slightly more reactogenicity with coadministration but few or no serious AEs or safety signals. Nearly every study confirmed that coadministration had no significant effect on immune response for either vaccine. The benefits of vaccine coadministration outweigh the risks. It increases convenience for vaccinees, reduces the number of missed opportunities to vaccinate, and contributes to efficient use of healthcare resources.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irv.70090\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irv.70090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irv.70090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童共同接种疫苗是一种长期的做法,已被证明在提高疫苗接种效率方面是安全有效的,从而提高免疫覆盖率。随着成人常规推荐的疫苗数量的增加,以及成年人与提供者获得预防性卫生接触点的机会有限,应考虑将成人疫苗共同施用作为一种常规做法,以提高疫苗接种覆盖率和公共卫生。对现有文献进行了回顾,以检查成人联合接种疫苗时潜在的反应性和对有效性的影响。方法以“流感疫苗”或“疫苗接种”为搜索词,结合“同时”、“伴随”、“并发”和“组合”搜索词,在Medline上搜索研究文章。在Medline上的另一个搜索词是“流感疫苗”或“疫苗接种”,结合以下单个搜索词:“RSV”、“COVID”和“Tdap”。提取的文章的参考文献也检查潜在的其他相关文章。结果与结论成人疫苗联合使用在我们评估的所有组合中都是安全的。大多数不良事件(ae)一般为轻度至中度,持续时间短。一些研究表明,联合给药的反应性略高,但很少或没有严重的不良反应或安全信号。几乎每一项研究都证实,两种疫苗同时接种对两种疫苗的免疫反应没有显著影响。疫苗联合使用的好处大于风险。它增加了接种疫苗者的便利性,减少了错过接种疫苗的机会,并有助于有效利用卫生保健资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adult Vaccine Coadministration Is Safe, Effective, and Acceptable: Results of a Survey of the Literature

Background

Coadministration of vaccines in children is a long-standing practice that has proven to be safe and effective in improving the efficiency of vaccine administration, thereby increasing immunization coverage rates. As the number of vaccines routinely recommended for adults increases, and with limited opportunities for adults to have preventive health touchpoints with providers, adult vaccine coadministration should be considered as a routine practice to improve vaccination coverage rates and public health. A review of existing literature was conducted to examine the potential reactogenicity and impact on effectiveness when co-administering vaccines to adults.

Methods

Medline was searched for research articles with the search term “influenza vaccine” or “vaccination,” combined with the search terms “simultaneous,” “concomitant,” “concurrent,” and “combination.” Another search of Medline was conducted on the search term “influenza vaccine” or “vaccination” combined with the following individual search terms: “RSV,” “COVID,” and “Tdap.” The references of extracted articles were also examined for potential other relevant articles.

Results and Conclusions

Adult vaccine coadministration is safe for all the combinations we assessed. Most adverse events (AEs) were generally mild to moderate and of short duration. Some studies showed slightly more reactogenicity with coadministration but few or no serious AEs or safety signals. Nearly every study confirmed that coadministration had no significant effect on immune response for either vaccine. The benefits of vaccine coadministration outweigh the risks. It increases convenience for vaccinees, reduces the number of missed opportunities to vaccinate, and contributes to efficient use of healthcare resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is the official journal of the International Society of Influenza and Other Respiratory Virus Diseases - an independent scientific professional society - dedicated to promoting the prevention, detection, treatment, and control of influenza and other respiratory virus diseases. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is an Open Access journal. Copyright on any research article published by Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is retained by the author(s). Authors grant Wiley a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信