Hannah Younes
{"title":"Comparing injuries from e-scooters, e-bikes, and bicycles in the United States","authors":"Hannah Younes","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a growing perception that e-scooters are more dangerous than bicycles and e-bikes, with towns implementing measures to ban their usage. Yet, there is not much evidence from large scale surveys to substantiate this claim. Nearly 14,000 micromobility injuries leading to emergency care in the United States in 2021 and 2022 are analyzed in this study. The following questions are addressed: What are the characteristics of injured micromobility users? Are injured e-scooter users more likely to suffer severe or fatal injuries than other injured micromobility users? What is the relationship between motor-vehicles and micromobility-related injuries? Around 15 % of injured micromobility users presenting to an emergency department were admitted to the hospital. Injured e-scooter users were not more likely to suffer severe injuries than bicyclists and e-bike users. Factors influencing micromobility injury severity included: older age, being male, involvement of a motor-vehicle, and alcohol/substance use. E-bike injuries were more likely to (33 %) involve a motor-vehicle than bicycle (26 %) and e-scooter injuries (23 %). Injured e-scooter users were more diverse (e.g., a higher proportion of women and minorities) and tended to be younger than bicyclists and e-bike users, indicating a potential wider diversity of users. As micromobility becomes a growing mode of sustainable transportation, we must ensure that conditions are safe for all users. This includes separated and protected pathways for micromobility users, traffic calming measures for motor-vehicles, adequate post-crash care for all, and policies that advocate for safe usage, instead of preventing usage, of micromobility modes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105925000051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的人认为,电动滑板车比自行车和电动自行车更危险,因此一些城镇采取了禁止使用电动滑板车的措施。然而,大规模调查并没有太多证据证明这种说法。本研究分析了 2021 年和 2022 年美国导致急诊的近 14,000 起微型电动车伤害事故。研究涉及以下问题受伤的微型交通工具使用者有哪些特征?与其他受伤的微型交通工具使用者相比,受伤的电动摩托车使用者是否更有可能遭受严重或致命伤害?机动车与微移动相关伤害之间的关系是什么?在前往急诊科就诊的微型交通工具受伤者中,约有15%的人被送入医院。与自行车和电动自行车使用者相比,电动摩托车使用者受伤的严重程度并不高。影响微型交通工具受伤严重程度的因素包括:年龄较大、男性、涉及机动车辆以及酗酒/服用药物。与自行车(26%)和电动滑板车(23%)相比,电动自行车受伤(33%)更有可能涉及机动车。与自行车和电动自行车使用者相比,电动滑板车使用者更加多样化(例如,女性和少数民族的比例更高),而且往往更年轻,这表明使用者可能更加多样化。随着微型交通成为一种日益增长的可持续交通方式,我们必须确保所有使用者的安全。这包括为微型交通使用者提供分隔的、受保护的道路,为机动车采取交通疏导措施,为所有人提供充分的碰撞后护理,以及倡导安全使用而不是阻止使用微型交通模式的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing injuries from e-scooters, e-bikes, and bicycles in the United States
There is a growing perception that e-scooters are more dangerous than bicycles and e-bikes, with towns implementing measures to ban their usage. Yet, there is not much evidence from large scale surveys to substantiate this claim. Nearly 14,000 micromobility injuries leading to emergency care in the United States in 2021 and 2022 are analyzed in this study. The following questions are addressed: What are the characteristics of injured micromobility users? Are injured e-scooter users more likely to suffer severe or fatal injuries than other injured micromobility users? What is the relationship between motor-vehicles and micromobility-related injuries? Around 15 % of injured micromobility users presenting to an emergency department were admitted to the hospital. Injured e-scooter users were not more likely to suffer severe injuries than bicyclists and e-bike users. Factors influencing micromobility injury severity included: older age, being male, involvement of a motor-vehicle, and alcohol/substance use. E-bike injuries were more likely to (33 %) involve a motor-vehicle than bicycle (26 %) and e-scooter injuries (23 %). Injured e-scooter users were more diverse (e.g., a higher proportion of women and minorities) and tended to be younger than bicyclists and e-bike users, indicating a potential wider diversity of users. As micromobility becomes a growing mode of sustainable transportation, we must ensure that conditions are safe for all users. This includes separated and protected pathways for micromobility users, traffic calming measures for motor-vehicles, adequate post-crash care for all, and policies that advocate for safe usage, instead of preventing usage, of micromobility modes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信