森林景观的娱乐和美学价值:量化管理影响和与供应和调节生态系统服务的权衡

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Dagm Abate , Brigite Botequim , Susete Marques , Constantino Lagoa , Juan Guerra Hernández , Geerten Hengeveld , Marjanke Hoogstra-Klein , José G. Borges
{"title":"森林景观的娱乐和美学价值:量化管理影响和与供应和调节生态系统服务的权衡","authors":"Dagm Abate ,&nbsp;Brigite Botequim ,&nbsp;Susete Marques ,&nbsp;Constantino Lagoa ,&nbsp;Juan Guerra Hernández ,&nbsp;Geerten Hengeveld ,&nbsp;Marjanke Hoogstra-Klein ,&nbsp;José G. Borges","doi":"10.1016/j.fecs.2025.100318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cultural ecosystem services (CES), which encompass recreational and aesthetic values, contribute to human well-being and yet are often underrepresented in forest management planning due to challenges in quantifying these services. This study introduces the Recreational and Aesthetic Values of Forested Landscapes (RAFL) index, a novel framework combining six measurable recreational and aesthetic components: Stewardship, Naturalness, Complexity, Visual Scale, Historicity, and Ephemera. The RAFL index was integrated into a Linear Programming (LP) Resource Capability Model (RCM) to assess trade-offs between CES and other ecosystem services, including timber production, wildfire resistance, and biodiversity. The approach was applied in a case study in Northern Portugal, comparing two forest management scenarios: Business as Usual (BAU), dominated by eucalyptus plantations, and an Alternative Scenario (ALT), focused on the conversion to native species: cork oak, chestnut, and pedunculate oak. Results revealed that the ALT scenario consistently achieved higher RAFL values, reflecting its potential to enhance CES, while also supporting higher biodiversity and wildfire resilience compared to the BAU scenario. Results highlighted further that management may maintain steady timber production and wildfire regulatory services while addressing concerns with CES. This study provides a replicable methodology for quantifying CES and integrating them into forest management frameworks, offering actionable insights for decision-makers. The findings highlight the effectiveness of the approach in designing landscape mosaics that provide CES while addressing the need to supply provisioning and regulatory ecosystem services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54270,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecosystems","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100318"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recreational and aesthetic values of forest landscapes (RAFL): Quantifying management impacts and trade-offs with provisioning and regulatory ecosystem services\",\"authors\":\"Dagm Abate ,&nbsp;Brigite Botequim ,&nbsp;Susete Marques ,&nbsp;Constantino Lagoa ,&nbsp;Juan Guerra Hernández ,&nbsp;Geerten Hengeveld ,&nbsp;Marjanke Hoogstra-Klein ,&nbsp;José G. Borges\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fecs.2025.100318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cultural ecosystem services (CES), which encompass recreational and aesthetic values, contribute to human well-being and yet are often underrepresented in forest management planning due to challenges in quantifying these services. This study introduces the Recreational and Aesthetic Values of Forested Landscapes (RAFL) index, a novel framework combining six measurable recreational and aesthetic components: Stewardship, Naturalness, Complexity, Visual Scale, Historicity, and Ephemera. The RAFL index was integrated into a Linear Programming (LP) Resource Capability Model (RCM) to assess trade-offs between CES and other ecosystem services, including timber production, wildfire resistance, and biodiversity. The approach was applied in a case study in Northern Portugal, comparing two forest management scenarios: Business as Usual (BAU), dominated by eucalyptus plantations, and an Alternative Scenario (ALT), focused on the conversion to native species: cork oak, chestnut, and pedunculate oak. Results revealed that the ALT scenario consistently achieved higher RAFL values, reflecting its potential to enhance CES, while also supporting higher biodiversity and wildfire resilience compared to the BAU scenario. Results highlighted further that management may maintain steady timber production and wildfire regulatory services while addressing concerns with CES. This study provides a replicable methodology for quantifying CES and integrating them into forest management frameworks, offering actionable insights for decision-makers. The findings highlight the effectiveness of the approach in designing landscape mosaics that provide CES while addressing the need to supply provisioning and regulatory ecosystem services.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecosystems\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562025000272\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562025000272","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文化生态系统服务(CES)包括娱乐和审美价值,有助于人类福祉,但由于在量化这些服务方面存在挑战,因此在森林管理规划中往往代表性不足。本文介绍了森林景观的娱乐和美学价值指数(RAFL),这是一个新的框架,结合了六个可测量的娱乐和美学成分:管理,自然性,复杂性,视觉规模,历史性和短暂性。将RAFL指数整合到线性规划(LP)资源能力模型(RCM)中,以评估CES与其他生态系统服务(包括木材生产、野火抗性和生物多样性)之间的权衡。该方法在葡萄牙北部的一个案例研究中得到应用,比较了两种森林管理情景:以桉树人工林为主的“一切照旧”(BAU)和侧重于向本地物种(栓皮栎、栗子和有柄橡树)转化的“替代情景”(ALT)。结果表明,与BAU情景相比,ALT情景持续获得更高的RAFL值,反映了其增强CES的潜力,同时也支持更高的生物多样性和野火恢复能力。结果进一步强调,管理部门可以在解决CES问题的同时保持稳定的木材生产和野火监管服务。本研究提供了一种可复制的方法,用于量化森林消费环境并将其纳入森林管理框架,为决策者提供可操作的见解。研究结果强调了该方法在设计景观马赛克时的有效性,该方法在解决供应和监管生态系统服务的需求的同时提供了CES。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recreational and aesthetic values of forest landscapes (RAFL): Quantifying management impacts and trade-offs with provisioning and regulatory ecosystem services
Cultural ecosystem services (CES), which encompass recreational and aesthetic values, contribute to human well-being and yet are often underrepresented in forest management planning due to challenges in quantifying these services. This study introduces the Recreational and Aesthetic Values of Forested Landscapes (RAFL) index, a novel framework combining six measurable recreational and aesthetic components: Stewardship, Naturalness, Complexity, Visual Scale, Historicity, and Ephemera. The RAFL index was integrated into a Linear Programming (LP) Resource Capability Model (RCM) to assess trade-offs between CES and other ecosystem services, including timber production, wildfire resistance, and biodiversity. The approach was applied in a case study in Northern Portugal, comparing two forest management scenarios: Business as Usual (BAU), dominated by eucalyptus plantations, and an Alternative Scenario (ALT), focused on the conversion to native species: cork oak, chestnut, and pedunculate oak. Results revealed that the ALT scenario consistently achieved higher RAFL values, reflecting its potential to enhance CES, while also supporting higher biodiversity and wildfire resilience compared to the BAU scenario. Results highlighted further that management may maintain steady timber production and wildfire regulatory services while addressing concerns with CES. This study provides a replicable methodology for quantifying CES and integrating them into forest management frameworks, offering actionable insights for decision-makers. The findings highlight the effectiveness of the approach in designing landscape mosaics that provide CES while addressing the need to supply provisioning and regulatory ecosystem services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecosystems
Forest Ecosystems Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1115
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecosystems is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing scientific communications from any discipline that can provide interesting contributions about the structure and dynamics of "natural" and "domesticated" forest ecosystems, and their services to people. The journal welcomes innovative science as well as application oriented work that will enhance understanding of woody plant communities. Very specific studies are welcome if they are part of a thematic series that provides some holistic perspective that is of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信