Krishna Prasad Devkota , Mina Devkota , Hasan Boboev , Diyor Juraev , Sherzod Dilmurodov , Ram C. Sharma
{"title":"数据驱动的农艺解决方案缩小乌兹别克斯坦小麦产量差距,实现自给自足","authors":"Krishna Prasad Devkota , Mina Devkota , Hasan Boboev , Diyor Juraev , Sherzod Dilmurodov , Ram C. Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Agriculture is a cornerstone of Uzbekistan's economy, accounting for 25 % to the national gross domestic product and employing 26 % of the workforce. Since independence, wheat intensification has been a national priority, with cultivated land expanding from 0.63 million hectares (Mha) to 1.24 Mha and productivity increasing from 1.66 t ha<sup>−1</sup> in 1991 to 4.55 t ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2023. However, on-farm yields remain below attainable yield, leading to a reliance on wheat imports to meet domestic demand. Closing this yield gap is critical for achieving national wheat self-sufficiency.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><div>This study aims to identify key yield-limiting factors and develop evidence-based, agroecologically optimized bundled solutions to enhance wheat productivity in Uzbekistan. By integrating multiple analytical approaches, the research seeks to provide targeted agronomic recommendations for improving sustainability and self-sufficiency.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>A combination of systematic reviews, crop modeling, and machine learning was used to analyze wheat yield gaps and optimize agronomic practices. Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) -Wheat model was calibrated, validated and used to simulate wheat yields over 36-years across four agro-ecological zones (AEZs): Khorezm (arid saline lowland), Kashkadarya (semi-arid highland), Samarkand (semi-arid mid-altitude), and Jizzakh (arid high-altitude). The simulations optimized seeding dates, nitrogen fertilizer rates, cultivar selection, and water management practices. Additionally, a meta-analysis of 90 studies and machine learning were employed to identify key determinants of wheat yield variation.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>To achieve self-sufficiency, Uzbekistan requires an average wheat yield of 6.62 t ha<sup>−1</sup>, necessitating a 45 % (2.07 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) increase from current levels (4.55 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), while the yield gap of 3.25 t ha<sup>−1</sup> exists. The study identified nitrogen fertilization, irrigation, rainfall, cultivar selection, and seeding dates as the primary determinants of yield. Wheat yield declined significantly when plant-available water content dropped below 50 %, establishing a critical threshold for sustainable productivity. Precision nutrient management included applying 150–180 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, up to 120 kg P₂O₅ ha<sup>−1</sup>, and 75 kg K₂O ha<sup>−1</sup>. Conservation agriculture showed a 26 % increase in yields compared to conventional tillage. High-yielding, stress-tolerant wheat varieties released after 2010 increased wheat productivity by up to 22 %. Seeding between September 15 and October 15 maximized yields, while delayed sowing reduced yield by up to 57 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>. Seed rates of 160–180 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> improved plant density and yields, preventing excessive competition or underutilization.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study offers a science-based framework for improving wheat productivity in Uzbekistan through AEZ-specific, resource-efficient bundled solutions. By integrating crop modeling, machine learning, and systematic reviews, this study provides scalable solutions to enhance input use efficiency, resilience to climate variability, and sustainable intensification. Beyond Uzbekistan, these findings hold relevance for wheat production in other arid and semi-arid regions facing similar food security challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"225 ","pages":"Article 104291"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-Driven Agronomic Solutions to Close Wheat Yield Gaps and Achieve Self-Sufficiency in Uzbekistan\",\"authors\":\"Krishna Prasad Devkota , Mina Devkota , Hasan Boboev , Diyor Juraev , Sherzod Dilmurodov , Ram C. Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Agriculture is a cornerstone of Uzbekistan's economy, accounting for 25 % to the national gross domestic product and employing 26 % of the workforce. Since independence, wheat intensification has been a national priority, with cultivated land expanding from 0.63 million hectares (Mha) to 1.24 Mha and productivity increasing from 1.66 t ha<sup>−1</sup> in 1991 to 4.55 t ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2023. However, on-farm yields remain below attainable yield, leading to a reliance on wheat imports to meet domestic demand. Closing this yield gap is critical for achieving national wheat self-sufficiency.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><div>This study aims to identify key yield-limiting factors and develop evidence-based, agroecologically optimized bundled solutions to enhance wheat productivity in Uzbekistan. By integrating multiple analytical approaches, the research seeks to provide targeted agronomic recommendations for improving sustainability and self-sufficiency.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>A combination of systematic reviews, crop modeling, and machine learning was used to analyze wheat yield gaps and optimize agronomic practices. Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) -Wheat model was calibrated, validated and used to simulate wheat yields over 36-years across four agro-ecological zones (AEZs): Khorezm (arid saline lowland), Kashkadarya (semi-arid highland), Samarkand (semi-arid mid-altitude), and Jizzakh (arid high-altitude). The simulations optimized seeding dates, nitrogen fertilizer rates, cultivar selection, and water management practices. Additionally, a meta-analysis of 90 studies and machine learning were employed to identify key determinants of wheat yield variation.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>To achieve self-sufficiency, Uzbekistan requires an average wheat yield of 6.62 t ha<sup>−1</sup>, necessitating a 45 % (2.07 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) increase from current levels (4.55 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), while the yield gap of 3.25 t ha<sup>−1</sup> exists. The study identified nitrogen fertilization, irrigation, rainfall, cultivar selection, and seeding dates as the primary determinants of yield. Wheat yield declined significantly when plant-available water content dropped below 50 %, establishing a critical threshold for sustainable productivity. Precision nutrient management included applying 150–180 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, up to 120 kg P₂O₅ ha<sup>−1</sup>, and 75 kg K₂O ha<sup>−1</sup>. Conservation agriculture showed a 26 % increase in yields compared to conventional tillage. High-yielding, stress-tolerant wheat varieties released after 2010 increased wheat productivity by up to 22 %. Seeding between September 15 and October 15 maximized yields, while delayed sowing reduced yield by up to 57 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>. Seed rates of 160–180 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> improved plant density and yields, preventing excessive competition or underutilization.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study offers a science-based framework for improving wheat productivity in Uzbekistan through AEZ-specific, resource-efficient bundled solutions. By integrating crop modeling, machine learning, and systematic reviews, this study provides scalable solutions to enhance input use efficiency, resilience to climate variability, and sustainable intensification. Beyond Uzbekistan, these findings hold relevance for wheat production in other arid and semi-arid regions facing similar food security challenges.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"225 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25000319\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25000319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
农业是乌兹别克斯坦经济的基石,占全国国内生产总值的25%,雇佣了26%的劳动力。自独立以来,小麦集约化一直是国家优先事项,耕地面积从63万公顷扩大到1.24万公顷,生产力从1991年的1.66 t ha - 1增加到2023年的4.55 t ha - 1。然而,农场产量仍低于可达到的产量,导致依赖进口小麦来满足国内需求。缩小这一产量差距对于实现国家小麦自给自足至关重要。本研究旨在确定关键的产量限制因素,并开发基于证据的农业生态优化捆绑解决方案,以提高乌兹别克斯坦的小麦生产力。通过整合多种分析方法,该研究旨在为提高可持续性和自给自足提供有针对性的农艺建议。方法采用系统综述、作物建模和机器学习相结合的方法分析小麦产量差距并优化农艺措施。农业生产系统模拟器(APSIM) -小麦模型被校准、验证并用于模拟四个农业生态区(aez) 36年的小麦产量:Khorezm(干旱盐碱地)、Kashkadarya(半干旱高地)、撒马尔罕(半干旱中海拔)和Jizzakh(干旱高海拔)。模拟优化了播期、氮肥用量、品种选择和水分管理措施。此外,采用90项研究和机器学习的荟萃分析来确定小麦产量变化的关键决定因素。结果与结论为实现自给自足,乌兹别克斯坦平均小麦产量需要达到6.62 t ha - 1,需要在当前水平(4.55 t ha - 1)的基础上提高45% (2.07 t ha - 1),但仍存在3.25 t ha - 1的产量缺口。研究确定氮肥、灌溉、降雨、品种选择和播种日期是产量的主要决定因素。当植株有效水分含量低于50%时,小麦产量显著下降,达到可持续生产力的临界阈值。精确的养分管理包括施用150-180公斤N ha - 1,高达120公斤P₂O₅ha - 1和75公斤K₂O ha - 1。保护性农业与传统耕作相比,产量增加了26%。2010年以后发布的高产、耐胁迫小麦品种使小麦产量提高了22%。在9月15日至10月15日之间播种产量最高,而延迟播种产量减少高达57公斤/公顷/天。160-180 kg ha - 1的播种率提高了植株密度和产量,防止了过度竞争或利用不足。意义本研究提供了一个基于科学的框架,通过针对乌兹别克斯坦经济特区的资源节约型捆绑解决方案来提高小麦产量。通过整合作物建模、机器学习和系统评估,本研究提供了可扩展的解决方案,以提高投入物的使用效率、对气候变化的适应能力和可持续集约化。除乌兹别克斯坦外,这些发现对面临类似粮食安全挑战的其他干旱和半干旱地区的小麦生产也具有相关性。
Data-Driven Agronomic Solutions to Close Wheat Yield Gaps and Achieve Self-Sufficiency in Uzbekistan
CONTEXT
Agriculture is a cornerstone of Uzbekistan's economy, accounting for 25 % to the national gross domestic product and employing 26 % of the workforce. Since independence, wheat intensification has been a national priority, with cultivated land expanding from 0.63 million hectares (Mha) to 1.24 Mha and productivity increasing from 1.66 t ha−1 in 1991 to 4.55 t ha−1 in 2023. However, on-farm yields remain below attainable yield, leading to a reliance on wheat imports to meet domestic demand. Closing this yield gap is critical for achieving national wheat self-sufficiency.
OBJECTIVES
This study aims to identify key yield-limiting factors and develop evidence-based, agroecologically optimized bundled solutions to enhance wheat productivity in Uzbekistan. By integrating multiple analytical approaches, the research seeks to provide targeted agronomic recommendations for improving sustainability and self-sufficiency.
METHODS
A combination of systematic reviews, crop modeling, and machine learning was used to analyze wheat yield gaps and optimize agronomic practices. Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) -Wheat model was calibrated, validated and used to simulate wheat yields over 36-years across four agro-ecological zones (AEZs): Khorezm (arid saline lowland), Kashkadarya (semi-arid highland), Samarkand (semi-arid mid-altitude), and Jizzakh (arid high-altitude). The simulations optimized seeding dates, nitrogen fertilizer rates, cultivar selection, and water management practices. Additionally, a meta-analysis of 90 studies and machine learning were employed to identify key determinants of wheat yield variation.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
To achieve self-sufficiency, Uzbekistan requires an average wheat yield of 6.62 t ha−1, necessitating a 45 % (2.07 t ha−1) increase from current levels (4.55 t ha−1), while the yield gap of 3.25 t ha−1 exists. The study identified nitrogen fertilization, irrigation, rainfall, cultivar selection, and seeding dates as the primary determinants of yield. Wheat yield declined significantly when plant-available water content dropped below 50 %, establishing a critical threshold for sustainable productivity. Precision nutrient management included applying 150–180 kg N ha−1, up to 120 kg P₂O₅ ha−1, and 75 kg K₂O ha−1. Conservation agriculture showed a 26 % increase in yields compared to conventional tillage. High-yielding, stress-tolerant wheat varieties released after 2010 increased wheat productivity by up to 22 %. Seeding between September 15 and October 15 maximized yields, while delayed sowing reduced yield by up to 57 kg ha−1 day−1. Seed rates of 160–180 kg ha−1 improved plant density and yields, preventing excessive competition or underutilization.
SIGNIFICANCE
This study offers a science-based framework for improving wheat productivity in Uzbekistan through AEZ-specific, resource-efficient bundled solutions. By integrating crop modeling, machine learning, and systematic reviews, this study provides scalable solutions to enhance input use efficiency, resilience to climate variability, and sustainable intensification. Beyond Uzbekistan, these findings hold relevance for wheat production in other arid and semi-arid regions facing similar food security challenges.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.