海上可再生能源权益的演变:系统文献综述

IF 5.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Mohammad Nasir Tighsazzadeh , Andréanne Doyon , Shana Lee Hirsch , Andrés M. Cisneros-Montemayor
{"title":"海上可再生能源权益的演变:系统文献综述","authors":"Mohammad Nasir Tighsazzadeh ,&nbsp;Andréanne Doyon ,&nbsp;Shana Lee Hirsch ,&nbsp;Andrés M. Cisneros-Montemayor","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Offshore renewable energy (ORE) projects are becoming a promising solution in transitioning to cleaner energy, but there are important questions regarding the governance and policy goals of such projects, particularly given frequent opposition from local communities who do not believe these projects lead to equitable benefits. This study explores the relationship between ORE and equity, analyzing how the concept of equity has been conceptualized over the last two decades. A systematic review of this scholarship shows that research from various disciplines has investigated and narrowed the broad concept of equity to a few core considerations, but these have not yet been specifically integrated to inform ORE. These equity considerations have so far evolved through three stages. First, the initial focus was on the cause-and-effect relationships between public perception, conflicts, and acceptance, showing that divergent stakeholder perceptions of ORE can lead to social conflicts, and consequently, low public acceptance. This highlights the importance of recognitional justice to ensure that all stakeholder perspectives are acknowledged and valued. The second stage sheds light on public engagement as a potential solution for converging different attitudes towards ORE. The third stage introduced the concept of energy justice into ORE equity studies, emphasizing the need for equal consideration of energy justice principles. Based on this, we recommend that research and development in ORE adopt a context-appropriate definition of equity and use transdisciplinary methods to facilitate collaboration and integration on unique local social, economic, and ecological conditions. In addition, future research should strive for flexible ORE processes that encompass all principles of energy justice and minimize negative trade-offs by prioritizing local goals. These strategies aim to ensure ORE projects are developed with a strong emphasis on equity and justice that can enable a transition to cleaner energy while respecting local goals and redressing past injustice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 107603"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evolution of equity in offshore renewable energy: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Nasir Tighsazzadeh ,&nbsp;Andréanne Doyon ,&nbsp;Shana Lee Hirsch ,&nbsp;Andrés M. Cisneros-Montemayor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Offshore renewable energy (ORE) projects are becoming a promising solution in transitioning to cleaner energy, but there are important questions regarding the governance and policy goals of such projects, particularly given frequent opposition from local communities who do not believe these projects lead to equitable benefits. This study explores the relationship between ORE and equity, analyzing how the concept of equity has been conceptualized over the last two decades. A systematic review of this scholarship shows that research from various disciplines has investigated and narrowed the broad concept of equity to a few core considerations, but these have not yet been specifically integrated to inform ORE. These equity considerations have so far evolved through three stages. First, the initial focus was on the cause-and-effect relationships between public perception, conflicts, and acceptance, showing that divergent stakeholder perceptions of ORE can lead to social conflicts, and consequently, low public acceptance. This highlights the importance of recognitional justice to ensure that all stakeholder perspectives are acknowledged and valued. The second stage sheds light on public engagement as a potential solution for converging different attitudes towards ORE. The third stage introduced the concept of energy justice into ORE equity studies, emphasizing the need for equal consideration of energy justice principles. Based on this, we recommend that research and development in ORE adopt a context-appropriate definition of equity and use transdisciplinary methods to facilitate collaboration and integration on unique local social, economic, and ecological conditions. In addition, future research should strive for flexible ORE processes that encompass all principles of energy justice and minimize negative trade-offs by prioritizing local goals. These strategies aim to ensure ORE projects are developed with a strong emphasis on equity and justice that can enable a transition to cleaner energy while respecting local goals and redressing past injustice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"263 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125000651\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125000651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海上可再生能源(ORE)项目正在成为向清洁能源过渡的一个有希望的解决方案,但在这些项目的治理和政策目标方面存在重要问题,特别是考虑到当地社区经常反对这些项目,他们不相信这些项目会带来公平的利益。本研究探讨了ORE与公平之间的关系,分析了在过去二十年中公平概念是如何被概念化的。对这一学术研究的系统回顾表明,来自不同学科的研究已经调查并将公平的广泛概念缩小到几个核心考虑因素,但这些尚未被具体整合到ORE中。到目前为止,这些公平考虑因素经历了三个阶段的演变。首先,最初的重点是公众认知、冲突和接受度之间的因果关系,表明利益相关者对ORE的不同认知会导致社会冲突,从而导致公众接受度低。这突出了承认正义的重要性,以确保所有利益攸关方的观点得到承认和重视。第二阶段揭示了公众参与作为汇聚对可再生能源不同态度的潜在解决方案。第三阶段将能源公正的概念引入可再生能源公平研究,强调平等考虑能源公正原则的必要性。基于此,我们建议ORE的研究和开发采用适合环境的公平定义,并使用跨学科方法促进基于独特的当地社会、经济和生态条件的合作和整合。此外,未来的研究应努力实现灵活的ORE过程,包括能源正义的所有原则,并通过优先考虑当地目标来最大限度地减少负面权衡。这些战略的目的是确保开发可再生能源项目时着重强调公平和正义,从而在尊重地方目标和纠正过去的不公正的同时,实现向清洁能源的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The evolution of equity in offshore renewable energy: A systematic literature review
Offshore renewable energy (ORE) projects are becoming a promising solution in transitioning to cleaner energy, but there are important questions regarding the governance and policy goals of such projects, particularly given frequent opposition from local communities who do not believe these projects lead to equitable benefits. This study explores the relationship between ORE and equity, analyzing how the concept of equity has been conceptualized over the last two decades. A systematic review of this scholarship shows that research from various disciplines has investigated and narrowed the broad concept of equity to a few core considerations, but these have not yet been specifically integrated to inform ORE. These equity considerations have so far evolved through three stages. First, the initial focus was on the cause-and-effect relationships between public perception, conflicts, and acceptance, showing that divergent stakeholder perceptions of ORE can lead to social conflicts, and consequently, low public acceptance. This highlights the importance of recognitional justice to ensure that all stakeholder perspectives are acknowledged and valued. The second stage sheds light on public engagement as a potential solution for converging different attitudes towards ORE. The third stage introduced the concept of energy justice into ORE equity studies, emphasizing the need for equal consideration of energy justice principles. Based on this, we recommend that research and development in ORE adopt a context-appropriate definition of equity and use transdisciplinary methods to facilitate collaboration and integration on unique local social, economic, and ecological conditions. In addition, future research should strive for flexible ORE processes that encompass all principles of energy justice and minimize negative trade-offs by prioritizing local goals. These strategies aim to ensure ORE projects are developed with a strong emphasis on equity and justice that can enable a transition to cleaner energy while respecting local goals and redressing past injustice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信