环境监管政策如何影响企业ESG评级:中国数字经济中的后发优势

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yinghao Song , Zhaian Bian , Wei Tu , Juan He
{"title":"环境监管政策如何影响企业ESG评级:中国数字经济中的后发优势","authors":"Yinghao Song ,&nbsp;Zhaian Bian ,&nbsp;Wei Tu ,&nbsp;Juan He","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors are crucial for businesses to achieve long-term sustainable development, enhance competitiveness, and reduce risks. They play a significant role in meeting stakeholder expectations, enhancing brand reputation, attracting investment and talent, driving innovation and value creation, and fulfilling social and environmental responsibilities. Using panel data from Chinese listed companies between 2009 and 2021, this study utilizes the new environmental air quality standards (NEAQS) policy as a quasi-natural experiment to examine the impact of environmental regulatory policy on corporate ESG ratings in the context of the digital economy. This study finds that environmental regulation policies enhance corporate ESG ratings, with a latecomer advantage in the digital economy. Mechanism analysis indicates that promoting digital transformation, fostering green innovation, and increasing environmental costs are important mechanisms through which the NEAQS policy enhances corporate ESG ratings. Heterogeneity analysis shows that, in the context of digital economic development, companies with lower levels of digital transformation, asset intensity, and financing constraints have a latecomer advantage and can elevate corporate ESG ratings more effectively through digital transformation under environmental regulatory policies. This study provides new empirical evidence on the relationship between environmental regulatory policies and corporate ESG ratings and offers policy support for other countries seeking to enhance corporate social responsibility through environmental regulatory policies in the digital economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 108336"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How environmental regulation policies affect corporate ESG ratings: Latecomer advantage in China's digital economy\",\"authors\":\"Yinghao Song ,&nbsp;Zhaian Bian ,&nbsp;Wei Tu ,&nbsp;Juan He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors are crucial for businesses to achieve long-term sustainable development, enhance competitiveness, and reduce risks. They play a significant role in meeting stakeholder expectations, enhancing brand reputation, attracting investment and talent, driving innovation and value creation, and fulfilling social and environmental responsibilities. Using panel data from Chinese listed companies between 2009 and 2021, this study utilizes the new environmental air quality standards (NEAQS) policy as a quasi-natural experiment to examine the impact of environmental regulatory policy on corporate ESG ratings in the context of the digital economy. This study finds that environmental regulation policies enhance corporate ESG ratings, with a latecomer advantage in the digital economy. Mechanism analysis indicates that promoting digital transformation, fostering green innovation, and increasing environmental costs are important mechanisms through which the NEAQS policy enhances corporate ESG ratings. Heterogeneity analysis shows that, in the context of digital economic development, companies with lower levels of digital transformation, asset intensity, and financing constraints have a latecomer advantage and can elevate corporate ESG ratings more effectively through digital transformation under environmental regulatory policies. This study provides new empirical evidence on the relationship between environmental regulatory policies and corporate ESG ratings and offers policy support for other countries seeking to enhance corporate social responsibility through environmental regulatory policies in the digital economy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"144 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325001604\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325001604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业环境、社会和治理(ESG)因素对于企业实现长期可持续发展、增强竞争力和降低风险至关重要。它们在满足利益相关者期望、提升品牌声誉、吸引投资和人才、推动创新和价值创造以及履行社会和环境责任方面发挥着重要作用。本研究利用2009年至2021年中国上市公司的面板数据,利用新环境空气质量标准(NEAQS)政策作为准自然实验,考察了数字经济背景下环境监管政策对企业ESG评级的影响。研究发现,环境监管政策提高了企业ESG评级,在数字经济中具有后发优势。机制分析表明,推动数字化转型、培育绿色创新、提高环境成本是新质量政策提升企业ESG评级的重要机制。异质性分析表明,在数字经济发展背景下,数字化转型水平较低、资产强度较低、融资约束较弱的企业具有后发优势,在环境监管政策下通过数字化转型更能有效提升企业ESG评级。本研究为环境监管政策与企业ESG评级之间的关系提供了新的实证证据,并为其他寻求通过数字经济环境监管政策增强企业社会责任的国家提供了政策支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How environmental regulation policies affect corporate ESG ratings: Latecomer advantage in China's digital economy
Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors are crucial for businesses to achieve long-term sustainable development, enhance competitiveness, and reduce risks. They play a significant role in meeting stakeholder expectations, enhancing brand reputation, attracting investment and talent, driving innovation and value creation, and fulfilling social and environmental responsibilities. Using panel data from Chinese listed companies between 2009 and 2021, this study utilizes the new environmental air quality standards (NEAQS) policy as a quasi-natural experiment to examine the impact of environmental regulatory policy on corporate ESG ratings in the context of the digital economy. This study finds that environmental regulation policies enhance corporate ESG ratings, with a latecomer advantage in the digital economy. Mechanism analysis indicates that promoting digital transformation, fostering green innovation, and increasing environmental costs are important mechanisms through which the NEAQS policy enhances corporate ESG ratings. Heterogeneity analysis shows that, in the context of digital economic development, companies with lower levels of digital transformation, asset intensity, and financing constraints have a latecomer advantage and can elevate corporate ESG ratings more effectively through digital transformation under environmental regulatory policies. This study provides new empirical evidence on the relationship between environmental regulatory policies and corporate ESG ratings and offers policy support for other countries seeking to enhance corporate social responsibility through environmental regulatory policies in the digital economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信