Yuming Chong , Yilin Li , Xiaojun Wang , Nanze Yu , Jiuzuo Huang , Hairu Cao , Wenyun Ting , Xiao Long
{"title":"临床报告心理下脂肪评定量表中文版的开发与验证","authors":"Yuming Chong , Yilin Li , Xiaojun Wang , Nanze Yu , Jiuzuo Huang , Hairu Cao , Wenyun Ting , Xiao Long","doi":"10.1016/j.cjprs.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Excess submental fat (SMF) is a common facial aesthetic concern, and assessment scales play a crucial role in its evaluation. Existing SMF scales are based on Caucasian populations, although genetic background significantly influences SMF distribution. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a 5-point Chinese version of the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 150 volunteers, and captured photographs from the frontal, oblique, and lateral views were combined for each participant. A 5-point scale with descriptive criteria was primarily designed. Internal validation involved three experienced plastic surgeons, while external validation was conducted on 50 live volunteers by six additional raters. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A 5-point grading system with descriptive criteria was developed and validated as the Chinese CR-SMFRS. Internal validation demonstrated a good intra- and inter-rater consistency. During external validation, intraclass correlation coefficient values for each rater exceeded 0.850, indicating high intra-rater consistency. Moreover, the inter-rater reliability showed good consistency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Chinese version of the SMF rating scale is a reliable tool for clinical use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":65600,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of the Chinese version of the Clinician-reported submental fat rating scale\",\"authors\":\"Yuming Chong , Yilin Li , Xiaojun Wang , Nanze Yu , Jiuzuo Huang , Hairu Cao , Wenyun Ting , Xiao Long\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjprs.2024.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Excess submental fat (SMF) is a common facial aesthetic concern, and assessment scales play a crucial role in its evaluation. Existing SMF scales are based on Caucasian populations, although genetic background significantly influences SMF distribution. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a 5-point Chinese version of the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 150 volunteers, and captured photographs from the frontal, oblique, and lateral views were combined for each participant. A 5-point scale with descriptive criteria was primarily designed. Internal validation involved three experienced plastic surgeons, while external validation was conducted on 50 live volunteers by six additional raters. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A 5-point grading system with descriptive criteria was developed and validated as the Chinese CR-SMFRS. Internal validation demonstrated a good intra- and inter-rater consistency. During external validation, intraclass correlation coefficient values for each rater exceeded 0.850, indicating high intra-rater consistency. Moreover, the inter-rater reliability showed good consistency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Chinese version of the SMF rating scale is a reliable tool for clinical use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":65600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096691124001092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096691124001092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and validation of the Chinese version of the Clinician-reported submental fat rating scale
Background
Excess submental fat (SMF) is a common facial aesthetic concern, and assessment scales play a crucial role in its evaluation. Existing SMF scales are based on Caucasian populations, although genetic background significantly influences SMF distribution. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a 5-point Chinese version of the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (CR-SMFRS).
Methods
The study included 150 volunteers, and captured photographs from the frontal, oblique, and lateral views were combined for each participant. A 5-point scale with descriptive criteria was primarily designed. Internal validation involved three experienced plastic surgeons, while external validation was conducted on 50 live volunteers by six additional raters. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed.
Results
A 5-point grading system with descriptive criteria was developed and validated as the Chinese CR-SMFRS. Internal validation demonstrated a good intra- and inter-rater consistency. During external validation, intraclass correlation coefficient values for each rater exceeded 0.850, indicating high intra-rater consistency. Moreover, the inter-rater reliability showed good consistency.
Conclusion
The Chinese version of the SMF rating scale is a reliable tool for clinical use.