从安全素养的角度改善儿童交通安全:一项随机试验

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Huarong Wang , Yang Chen , Anni Wang , Wenjing Liu , Zhan Gao , David C. Schwebel
{"title":"从安全素养的角度改善儿童交通安全:一项随机试验","authors":"Huarong Wang ,&nbsp;Yang Chen ,&nbsp;Anni Wang ,&nbsp;Wenjing Liu ,&nbsp;Zhan Gao ,&nbsp;David C. Schwebel","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2025.02.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Objective:</em> Road traffic injuries are a leading cause of child death. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an integrated intervention comprised of adult guidance of peer discussion in response to traffic safety videos eliciting emotions of fear and threat, plus and engagement in a virtual reality (VR) pedestrian environment to improve children’s traffic safety literacy, including skills to negotiate traffic safely. <em>Methods:</em> Following screening, 120 children aged 9 to 13 years who scored high or low in traffic safety literacy were randomly assigned to a control (N = 60) or intervention (N = 60) group, stratified by traffic safety literacy and gender. All children completed baseline and post-intervention assessments to assess traffic safety literacy and street-crossing behaviors in a VR environment. Between assessments, children in the intervention group received adult-guided peer discussion training to improve traffic safety knowledge and attitudes, and also engaged in VR-based street-crossing behavioral training once a week for four weeks. Children in the control group received routine safety education in school. <em>Results:</em> Three primary results emerged: (a) children in the intervention group with low baseline traffic safety literacy demonstrated significantly greater improvement in all aspects of traffic safety literacy (traffic knowledge, traffic safety attitudes, traffic behaviors, and traffic safety self-efficacy) compared to children in the intervention group with high baseline traffic safety literacy and all children in the control group; (b) all children in the intervention group demonstrated safer and more efficient traffic behavior in the VR following training compared with children in the control group; (c) children in the intervention group demonstrated improved traffic behavior throughout their training despite a methodological challenge emerging with a two-week delay between the third training and the fourth training due to COVID-19 restrictions. <em>Conclusions:</em> The intervention effectively improved children’s traffic safety literacy, especially among those children with low literacy at baseline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 255-265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving children’s traffic safety from a safety literacy perspective: A randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"Huarong Wang ,&nbsp;Yang Chen ,&nbsp;Anni Wang ,&nbsp;Wenjing Liu ,&nbsp;Zhan Gao ,&nbsp;David C. Schwebel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsr.2025.02.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Objective:</em> Road traffic injuries are a leading cause of child death. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an integrated intervention comprised of adult guidance of peer discussion in response to traffic safety videos eliciting emotions of fear and threat, plus and engagement in a virtual reality (VR) pedestrian environment to improve children’s traffic safety literacy, including skills to negotiate traffic safely. <em>Methods:</em> Following screening, 120 children aged 9 to 13 years who scored high or low in traffic safety literacy were randomly assigned to a control (N = 60) or intervention (N = 60) group, stratified by traffic safety literacy and gender. All children completed baseline and post-intervention assessments to assess traffic safety literacy and street-crossing behaviors in a VR environment. Between assessments, children in the intervention group received adult-guided peer discussion training to improve traffic safety knowledge and attitudes, and also engaged in VR-based street-crossing behavioral training once a week for four weeks. Children in the control group received routine safety education in school. <em>Results:</em> Three primary results emerged: (a) children in the intervention group with low baseline traffic safety literacy demonstrated significantly greater improvement in all aspects of traffic safety literacy (traffic knowledge, traffic safety attitudes, traffic behaviors, and traffic safety self-efficacy) compared to children in the intervention group with high baseline traffic safety literacy and all children in the control group; (b) all children in the intervention group demonstrated safer and more efficient traffic behavior in the VR following training compared with children in the control group; (c) children in the intervention group demonstrated improved traffic behavior throughout their training despite a methodological challenge emerging with a two-week delay between the third training and the fourth training due to COVID-19 restrictions. <em>Conclusions:</em> The intervention effectively improved children’s traffic safety literacy, especially among those children with low literacy at baseline.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Safety Research\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 255-265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Safety Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437525000489\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437525000489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:道路交通伤害是儿童死亡的主要原因。本研究评估了综合干预的有效性,包括成人指导同伴讨论,以回应引发恐惧和威胁情绪的交通安全视频,以及参与虚拟现实(VR)行人环境,以提高儿童的交通安全素养,包括安全协商交通的技能。方法:筛选120名9 ~ 13岁交通安全素养得分高或低的儿童,按交通安全素养和性别分层,随机分为对照组(N = 60)和干预组(N = 60)。所有儿童都完成了基线和干预后评估,以评估虚拟现实环境下的交通安全素养和过马路行为。在评估期间,干预组儿童接受了成人指导的同伴讨论训练,以提高交通安全知识和态度,并进行了每周一次的基于vr的过马路行为训练,为期四周。对照组儿童在学校接受常规安全教育。结果:(a)低基线交通安全素养干预组儿童在交通安全素养的各个方面(交通安全知识、交通安全态度、交通行为和交通安全自我效能感)均显著高于高基线交通安全素养干预组儿童和对照组儿童;(b)与对照组的儿童相比,干预组的所有儿童在训练后的VR中表现出更安全和更有效的交通行为;(c)干预组的儿童在整个培训过程中表现出了改善的交通行为,尽管由于COVID-19的限制,第三次培训和第四次培训之间出现了两周的方法挑战。结论:干预有效地提高了儿童的交通安全素养,特别是对基础素养较低的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving children’s traffic safety from a safety literacy perspective: A randomized trial
Objective: Road traffic injuries are a leading cause of child death. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an integrated intervention comprised of adult guidance of peer discussion in response to traffic safety videos eliciting emotions of fear and threat, plus and engagement in a virtual reality (VR) pedestrian environment to improve children’s traffic safety literacy, including skills to negotiate traffic safely. Methods: Following screening, 120 children aged 9 to 13 years who scored high or low in traffic safety literacy were randomly assigned to a control (N = 60) or intervention (N = 60) group, stratified by traffic safety literacy and gender. All children completed baseline and post-intervention assessments to assess traffic safety literacy and street-crossing behaviors in a VR environment. Between assessments, children in the intervention group received adult-guided peer discussion training to improve traffic safety knowledge and attitudes, and also engaged in VR-based street-crossing behavioral training once a week for four weeks. Children in the control group received routine safety education in school. Results: Three primary results emerged: (a) children in the intervention group with low baseline traffic safety literacy demonstrated significantly greater improvement in all aspects of traffic safety literacy (traffic knowledge, traffic safety attitudes, traffic behaviors, and traffic safety self-efficacy) compared to children in the intervention group with high baseline traffic safety literacy and all children in the control group; (b) all children in the intervention group demonstrated safer and more efficient traffic behavior in the VR following training compared with children in the control group; (c) children in the intervention group demonstrated improved traffic behavior throughout their training despite a methodological challenge emerging with a two-week delay between the third training and the fourth training due to COVID-19 restrictions. Conclusions: The intervention effectively improved children’s traffic safety literacy, especially among those children with low literacy at baseline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信