设施强效益弱:中国14个邮轮港口设施绩效与经营绩效的实证评价

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS
Xianhua Wu, Zichen Dong, Shuhan Meng
{"title":"设施强效益弱:中国14个邮轮港口设施绩效与经营绩效的实证评价","authors":"Xianhua Wu,&nbsp;Zichen Dong,&nbsp;Shuhan Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China has been contributing a significant number of tourists to cruise trips. In recent years, China has undertaken large-scale investments in the construction of cruise ports. However, due to the lack of top-level design at the national level, these investments have been somewhat premature, leading to concerns regarding the operation of most cruise ports. A common issue is the discrepancy between strong infrastructure and weak operational efficiency, evidenced by the underutilization of port facilities, low berth occupancy rates, and a mismatch between dock construction standards and service functions. Currently, there is a scarcity of empirical studies based on data addressing these issues. This paper presents an empirical study using 14 cruise ports in China as examples. The study involves the following: 1) An evaluation index system was constructed, and the entropy - TOPSIS model was employed to assess the ‘facility performance’ of the 14 cruise ports. The results revealed a clear differentiation in facility performance, with ports in the Pearl River Delta showing the strongest facilities, while those in the southwestern coastal region exhibited the weakest. 2)The evaluation index system was divided into two categories based on the ‘input-output’ standard, and dimensionality reduction was performed using the PCA model. The DEA model was then used to evaluate ‘operational performance,’ revealing that ports in the Pearl River Delta had the highest efficiency, while those in the southwestern coastal region had the lowest. Controlling input is essential for each port to achieve DEA efficiency. 3)A comparison of the evaluation scores for ‘facility performance’ and ‘operational performance’ of individual and overall Chinese cruise ports indicated significant disparities between the two. This suggests a potential issue of ‘strong facilities, weak benefits ‘among Chinese cruise ports. 4)Eight influencing factors were hypothesized, and the Tobit model was used to analyze the impact of each factor on ‘facility performance’ and ‘operational performance.’ The results showed that the quality of urban economic development and the potential of the consumer market have a significant positive impact. In conclusion, the study suggests that the lag in the ‘operational performance’ of Chinese cruise ports is primarily due to the emphasis on cruise ships over passengers, and on hardware over software, leading to redundant investment from premature construction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 101334"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strong facilities but weak benefits: An empirical evaluation of facility performance and business performance of 14 cruise ports in China\",\"authors\":\"Xianhua Wu,&nbsp;Zichen Dong,&nbsp;Shuhan Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>China has been contributing a significant number of tourists to cruise trips. In recent years, China has undertaken large-scale investments in the construction of cruise ports. However, due to the lack of top-level design at the national level, these investments have been somewhat premature, leading to concerns regarding the operation of most cruise ports. A common issue is the discrepancy between strong infrastructure and weak operational efficiency, evidenced by the underutilization of port facilities, low berth occupancy rates, and a mismatch between dock construction standards and service functions. Currently, there is a scarcity of empirical studies based on data addressing these issues. This paper presents an empirical study using 14 cruise ports in China as examples. The study involves the following: 1) An evaluation index system was constructed, and the entropy - TOPSIS model was employed to assess the ‘facility performance’ of the 14 cruise ports. The results revealed a clear differentiation in facility performance, with ports in the Pearl River Delta showing the strongest facilities, while those in the southwestern coastal region exhibited the weakest. 2)The evaluation index system was divided into two categories based on the ‘input-output’ standard, and dimensionality reduction was performed using the PCA model. The DEA model was then used to evaluate ‘operational performance,’ revealing that ports in the Pearl River Delta had the highest efficiency, while those in the southwestern coastal region had the lowest. Controlling input is essential for each port to achieve DEA efficiency. 3)A comparison of the evaluation scores for ‘facility performance’ and ‘operational performance’ of individual and overall Chinese cruise ports indicated significant disparities between the two. This suggests a potential issue of ‘strong facilities, weak benefits ‘among Chinese cruise ports. 4)Eight influencing factors were hypothesized, and the Tobit model was used to analyze the impact of each factor on ‘facility performance’ and ‘operational performance.’ The results showed that the quality of urban economic development and the potential of the consumer market have a significant positive impact. In conclusion, the study suggests that the lag in the ‘operational performance’ of Chinese cruise ports is primarily due to the emphasis on cruise ships over passengers, and on hardware over software, leading to redundant investment from premature construction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525000495\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525000495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国为邮轮旅游贡献了大量游客。近年来,中国大规模投资建设邮轮港口。然而,由于缺乏国家层面的顶层设计,这些投资有些为时过早,导致对大多数邮轮港口运营的担忧。一个普遍的问题是基础设施强与运营效率弱之间的矛盾,表现为港口设施利用率低、泊位占用率低、码头建设标准与服务功能不匹配。目前,针对这些问题的基于数据的实证研究还很缺乏。本文以中国14个邮轮港口为例进行了实证研究。研究内容如下:1)构建了评价指标体系,采用熵- TOPSIS模型对14个邮轮港口的“设施绩效”进行了评价。结果显示,港口设施表现存在明显差异,珠江三角洲港口设施最强,而西南沿海地区的港口设施最差。2)根据“投入产出”标准将评价指标体系分为两类,并利用主成分分析模型进行降维。然后使用DEA模型评估“运营绩效”,结果显示珠江三角洲港口的效率最高,而西南沿海地区的效率最低。控制输入对于每个端口实现DEA效率至关重要。3)对中国邮轮港口的“设施绩效”和“运营绩效”的评价得分进行比较,发现两者之间存在显著差异。这表明中国邮轮港口可能存在“设施强,效益弱”的问题。4)假设了8个影响因素,利用Tobit模型分析了每个因素对“设施绩效”和“运营绩效”的影响。结果表明,城市经济发展的质量和消费市场的潜力有显著的积极影响。总之,研究表明,中国邮轮港口的“运营绩效”滞后主要是由于对邮轮的重视超过了乘客,对硬件的重视超过了软件,导致了过早建设带来的冗余投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strong facilities but weak benefits: An empirical evaluation of facility performance and business performance of 14 cruise ports in China
China has been contributing a significant number of tourists to cruise trips. In recent years, China has undertaken large-scale investments in the construction of cruise ports. However, due to the lack of top-level design at the national level, these investments have been somewhat premature, leading to concerns regarding the operation of most cruise ports. A common issue is the discrepancy between strong infrastructure and weak operational efficiency, evidenced by the underutilization of port facilities, low berth occupancy rates, and a mismatch between dock construction standards and service functions. Currently, there is a scarcity of empirical studies based on data addressing these issues. This paper presents an empirical study using 14 cruise ports in China as examples. The study involves the following: 1) An evaluation index system was constructed, and the entropy - TOPSIS model was employed to assess the ‘facility performance’ of the 14 cruise ports. The results revealed a clear differentiation in facility performance, with ports in the Pearl River Delta showing the strongest facilities, while those in the southwestern coastal region exhibited the weakest. 2)The evaluation index system was divided into two categories based on the ‘input-output’ standard, and dimensionality reduction was performed using the PCA model. The DEA model was then used to evaluate ‘operational performance,’ revealing that ports in the Pearl River Delta had the highest efficiency, while those in the southwestern coastal region had the lowest. Controlling input is essential for each port to achieve DEA efficiency. 3)A comparison of the evaluation scores for ‘facility performance’ and ‘operational performance’ of individual and overall Chinese cruise ports indicated significant disparities between the two. This suggests a potential issue of ‘strong facilities, weak benefits ‘among Chinese cruise ports. 4)Eight influencing factors were hypothesized, and the Tobit model was used to analyze the impact of each factor on ‘facility performance’ and ‘operational performance.’ The results showed that the quality of urban economic development and the potential of the consumer market have a significant positive impact. In conclusion, the study suggests that the lag in the ‘operational performance’ of Chinese cruise ports is primarily due to the emphasis on cruise ships over passengers, and on hardware over software, leading to redundant investment from premature construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信