带或不带软骨修复的髌骨股骨稳定

Joseph M. Rund , John W. Welsh , M. Benjamin Burch , John R. Worley , Lasun O. Oladeji , Taylor Ray , Aaron D. Gray , Betina B. Hinckel , Seth L. Sherman
{"title":"带或不带软骨修复的髌骨股骨稳定","authors":"Joseph M. Rund ,&nbsp;John W. Welsh ,&nbsp;M. Benjamin Burch ,&nbsp;John R. Worley ,&nbsp;Lasun O. Oladeji ,&nbsp;Taylor Ray ,&nbsp;Aaron D. Gray ,&nbsp;Betina B. Hinckel ,&nbsp;Seth L. Sherman","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjp.2024.100190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/Objectives</h3><div>Cartilage restoration as an adjunct to patellofemoral (PF) soft tissue and/or bony stabilization in patients with symptomatic PF instability remains controversial. Our purpose was to evaluate patients undergoing surgical stabilization for PF instability with or without concomitant cartilage restoration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified patients undergoing surgical stabilization for recurrent patella instability, with or without concomitant cartilage restoration. Presurgical and postsurgical patient-reported outcomes were collected. Complications requiring reoperation were recorded. Statistically significant difference was set at <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred thirty patients (144 knees) were included. One hundred thirteen knees in the isolated stabilization (STAB) and 31 knees in the Stabilization-Cartilage Restoration (STAB-CART) group. The average age was 20.64 and 25.03 in the STAB and STAB-CART groups (<em>P</em> = .034), respectively. STAB-CART group had significantly lower preoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (57.24 ± 17.45 vs 46.11 ± 14.74, <em>P</em> = .019) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores (43.15 ± 19.05 vs 26.85 ± 13.74, <em>P</em> = .002). Both groups statistically improved in all Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation domains with no statistically significant differences at final follow-up between groups. Thirteen knees (11.5%) in the STAB and 6 knees (19.4%) in the STAB-CART group had complications requiring reoperation, including 6 and 3 revision stabilizations, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in total major complications (<em>P</em> = .246) or medial PF ligament revision (<em>P</em> = .405).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of cartilage restoration in patients undergoing soft tissue and/or bony PF stabilization appears to be safe and effective. Despite lower baseline scores, patients undergoing PF stabilization with cartilage restoration had similar final subjective outcome scores compared to the group without.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patellofemoral stabilization with and without cartilage restoration\",\"authors\":\"Joseph M. Rund ,&nbsp;John W. Welsh ,&nbsp;M. Benjamin Burch ,&nbsp;John R. Worley ,&nbsp;Lasun O. Oladeji ,&nbsp;Taylor Ray ,&nbsp;Aaron D. Gray ,&nbsp;Betina B. Hinckel ,&nbsp;Seth L. Sherman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjp.2024.100190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction/Objectives</h3><div>Cartilage restoration as an adjunct to patellofemoral (PF) soft tissue and/or bony stabilization in patients with symptomatic PF instability remains controversial. Our purpose was to evaluate patients undergoing surgical stabilization for PF instability with or without concomitant cartilage restoration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified patients undergoing surgical stabilization for recurrent patella instability, with or without concomitant cartilage restoration. Presurgical and postsurgical patient-reported outcomes were collected. Complications requiring reoperation were recorded. Statistically significant difference was set at <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred thirty patients (144 knees) were included. One hundred thirteen knees in the isolated stabilization (STAB) and 31 knees in the Stabilization-Cartilage Restoration (STAB-CART) group. The average age was 20.64 and 25.03 in the STAB and STAB-CART groups (<em>P</em> = .034), respectively. STAB-CART group had significantly lower preoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (57.24 ± 17.45 vs 46.11 ± 14.74, <em>P</em> = .019) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores (43.15 ± 19.05 vs 26.85 ± 13.74, <em>P</em> = .002). Both groups statistically improved in all Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation domains with no statistically significant differences at final follow-up between groups. Thirteen knees (11.5%) in the STAB and 6 knees (19.4%) in the STAB-CART group had complications requiring reoperation, including 6 and 3 revision stabilizations, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in total major complications (<em>P</em> = .246) or medial PF ligament revision (<em>P</em> = .405).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of cartilage restoration in patients undergoing soft tissue and/or bony PF stabilization appears to be safe and effective. Despite lower baseline scores, patients undergoing PF stabilization with cartilage restoration had similar final subjective outcome scores compared to the group without.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266725452400026X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266725452400026X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软骨修复作为髌骨股骨(PF)软组织和/或骨稳定的辅助治疗在症状性PF不稳定患者中仍然存在争议。我们的目的是评估在伴或不伴软骨修复的情况下接受手术稳定治疗PF不稳定的患者。方法回顾性分析前瞻性收集的资料,确定接受手术稳定治疗复发性髌骨不稳的患者,伴有或不伴有软骨修复。收集术前和术后患者报告的结果。记录需要再次手术的并发症。P <处差异有统计学意义;. 05。结果纳入患者130例(144个膝关节)。113个膝关节为孤立稳定(STAB)组,31个膝关节为稳定-软骨修复(STAB- cart)组。STAB组和STAB- cart组的平均年龄分别为20.64岁和25.03岁(P = 0.034)。sta - cart组术前膝关节损伤和骨关节炎预后评分(57.24±17.45 vs 46.11±14.74,P = 0.019)和单次评估数值评估评分(43.15±19.05 vs 26.85±13.74,P = 0.002)均显著降低。两组在所有膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分、国际膝关节文献委员会和单一评估数值评估领域均有统计学改善,两组最终随访时无统计学显著差异。STAB组13例膝关节(11.5%)和STAB- cart组6例膝关节(19.4%)出现并发症,需要再次手术,分别包括6例和3例翻修稳定。两组主要并发症总数(P = 0.246)和内侧PF韧带翻修(P = 0.405)差异无统计学意义。结论在接受软组织和/或骨PF稳定的患者中加入软骨修复是安全有效的。尽管基线得分较低,但接受PF稳定并软骨修复的患者与未接受治疗的患者相比,最终主观结果得分相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patellofemoral stabilization with and without cartilage restoration

Introduction/Objectives

Cartilage restoration as an adjunct to patellofemoral (PF) soft tissue and/or bony stabilization in patients with symptomatic PF instability remains controversial. Our purpose was to evaluate patients undergoing surgical stabilization for PF instability with or without concomitant cartilage restoration.

Methods

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified patients undergoing surgical stabilization for recurrent patella instability, with or without concomitant cartilage restoration. Presurgical and postsurgical patient-reported outcomes were collected. Complications requiring reoperation were recorded. Statistically significant difference was set at P < .05.

Results

One hundred thirty patients (144 knees) were included. One hundred thirteen knees in the isolated stabilization (STAB) and 31 knees in the Stabilization-Cartilage Restoration (STAB-CART) group. The average age was 20.64 and 25.03 in the STAB and STAB-CART groups (P = .034), respectively. STAB-CART group had significantly lower preoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (57.24 ± 17.45 vs 46.11 ± 14.74, P = .019) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores (43.15 ± 19.05 vs 26.85 ± 13.74, P = .002). Both groups statistically improved in all Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation domains with no statistically significant differences at final follow-up between groups. Thirteen knees (11.5%) in the STAB and 6 knees (19.4%) in the STAB-CART group had complications requiring reoperation, including 6 and 3 revision stabilizations, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in total major complications (P = .246) or medial PF ligament revision (P = .405).

Conclusions

The addition of cartilage restoration in patients undergoing soft tissue and/or bony PF stabilization appears to be safe and effective. Despite lower baseline scores, patients undergoing PF stabilization with cartilage restoration had similar final subjective outcome scores compared to the group without.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信