政府的生态关切及其对协同污染和碳减排的影响:来自中国的证据

IF 7.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xueyang Wang , Wenling Liu , Xiumei Sun , Mahmood Ahmad , Jiawei Chen
{"title":"政府的生态关切及其对协同污染和碳减排的影响:来自中国的证据","authors":"Xueyang Wang ,&nbsp;Wenling Liu ,&nbsp;Xiumei Sun ,&nbsp;Mahmood Ahmad ,&nbsp;Jiawei Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.gr.2025.02.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study addresses the increasingly prominent issues stemming from the ongoing degradation of the ecological environment, which pose significant threats to human well-being and have consequently compelled the government to heighten its focus on environmental concerns. With a particular emphasis on the government’s ecological concerns, this study investigates their role in promoting collaborative governance for pollution reduction and carbon mitigation. Employing the fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS) methods, this research analyzes the relationship between government ecological concern and the effectiveness of collaborative governance in pollution and carbon reduction. The findings indicate that the government’s ecological concern, economic development, industrial structure, and trade openness can improve the performance of pollution reduction and carbon reduction collaborative governance. Conversely, a negative correlation is observed between urbanization and the effectiveness of such collaborative efforts. Notably, among various categories of government ecological concern, greater attention directed towards environmental pollution, energy consumption, and natural resource management significantly improves the performance of collaborative governance in pollution and carbon reduction. The positive impact of government ecological governance is not consistently sustained; it primarily affects collaborative pollution reduction and carbon mitigation governance at the middle to lower percentiles and exhibits a diminishing effect over time. The causality analysis results of Dumitrescu and Hurlin demonstrate the presence of a reciprocal causal relationship between the government’s ecological concern and pollution reduction and carbon reduction collaborative governance, while there exists a single causal link between economic development, industrial structure, trade opening, urbanization, and pollution reduction and carbon reduction collaborative governance. Drawing on these results, this study presents pertinent policy recommendations to inform and guide pollution reduction and carbon mitigation initiatives, thereby providing valuable insights and references for collaborative governance in this domain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12761,"journal":{"name":"Gondwana Research","volume":"141 ","pages":"Pages 180-194"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Government ecological concern and its impact on synergistic pollution and carbon reduction: Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Xueyang Wang ,&nbsp;Wenling Liu ,&nbsp;Xiumei Sun ,&nbsp;Mahmood Ahmad ,&nbsp;Jiawei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gr.2025.02.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study addresses the increasingly prominent issues stemming from the ongoing degradation of the ecological environment, which pose significant threats to human well-being and have consequently compelled the government to heighten its focus on environmental concerns. With a particular emphasis on the government’s ecological concerns, this study investigates their role in promoting collaborative governance for pollution reduction and carbon mitigation. Employing the fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS) methods, this research analyzes the relationship between government ecological concern and the effectiveness of collaborative governance in pollution and carbon reduction. The findings indicate that the government’s ecological concern, economic development, industrial structure, and trade openness can improve the performance of pollution reduction and carbon reduction collaborative governance. Conversely, a negative correlation is observed between urbanization and the effectiveness of such collaborative efforts. Notably, among various categories of government ecological concern, greater attention directed towards environmental pollution, energy consumption, and natural resource management significantly improves the performance of collaborative governance in pollution and carbon reduction. The positive impact of government ecological governance is not consistently sustained; it primarily affects collaborative pollution reduction and carbon mitigation governance at the middle to lower percentiles and exhibits a diminishing effect over time. The causality analysis results of Dumitrescu and Hurlin demonstrate the presence of a reciprocal causal relationship between the government’s ecological concern and pollution reduction and carbon reduction collaborative governance, while there exists a single causal link between economic development, industrial structure, trade opening, urbanization, and pollution reduction and carbon reduction collaborative governance. Drawing on these results, this study presents pertinent policy recommendations to inform and guide pollution reduction and carbon mitigation initiatives, thereby providing valuable insights and references for collaborative governance in this domain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gondwana Research\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 180-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gondwana Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X25000474\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gondwana Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X25000474","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Government ecological concern and its impact on synergistic pollution and carbon reduction: Evidence from China

Government ecological concern and its impact on synergistic pollution and carbon reduction: Evidence from China
This study addresses the increasingly prominent issues stemming from the ongoing degradation of the ecological environment, which pose significant threats to human well-being and have consequently compelled the government to heighten its focus on environmental concerns. With a particular emphasis on the government’s ecological concerns, this study investigates their role in promoting collaborative governance for pollution reduction and carbon mitigation. Employing the fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS) methods, this research analyzes the relationship between government ecological concern and the effectiveness of collaborative governance in pollution and carbon reduction. The findings indicate that the government’s ecological concern, economic development, industrial structure, and trade openness can improve the performance of pollution reduction and carbon reduction collaborative governance. Conversely, a negative correlation is observed between urbanization and the effectiveness of such collaborative efforts. Notably, among various categories of government ecological concern, greater attention directed towards environmental pollution, energy consumption, and natural resource management significantly improves the performance of collaborative governance in pollution and carbon reduction. The positive impact of government ecological governance is not consistently sustained; it primarily affects collaborative pollution reduction and carbon mitigation governance at the middle to lower percentiles and exhibits a diminishing effect over time. The causality analysis results of Dumitrescu and Hurlin demonstrate the presence of a reciprocal causal relationship between the government’s ecological concern and pollution reduction and carbon reduction collaborative governance, while there exists a single causal link between economic development, industrial structure, trade opening, urbanization, and pollution reduction and carbon reduction collaborative governance. Drawing on these results, this study presents pertinent policy recommendations to inform and guide pollution reduction and carbon mitigation initiatives, thereby providing valuable insights and references for collaborative governance in this domain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gondwana Research
Gondwana Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
298
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Gondwana Research (GR) is an International Journal aimed to promote high quality research publications on all topics related to solid Earth, particularly with reference to the origin and evolution of continents, continental assemblies and their resources. GR is an "all earth science" journal with no restrictions on geological time, terrane or theme and covers a wide spectrum of topics in geosciences such as geology, geomorphology, palaeontology, structure, petrology, geochemistry, stable isotopes, geochronology, economic geology, exploration geology, engineering geology, geophysics, and environmental geology among other themes, and provides an appropriate forum to integrate studies from different disciplines and different terrains. In addition to regular articles and thematic issues, the journal invites high profile state-of-the-art reviews on thrust area topics for its column, ''GR FOCUS''. Focus articles include short biographies and photographs of the authors. Short articles (within ten printed pages) for rapid publication reporting important discoveries or innovative models of global interest will be considered under the category ''GR LETTERS''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信