基于人工智能的运动检测可穿戴设备的初步可用性评估:老年功能评估系统

John A Batsis, Rishank Singh, Jennifer Poole, Paige Bramblett, Danae Gross, Meredith Gilliam, Chaterlee Pamintuan, Beckham Nora, David H Lynch, Xiaohui Liang
{"title":"基于人工智能的运动检测可穿戴设备的初步可用性评估:老年功能评估系统","authors":"John A Batsis, Rishank Singh, Jennifer Poole, Paige Bramblett, Danae Gross, Meredith Gilliam, Chaterlee Pamintuan, Beckham Nora, David H Lynch, Xiaohui Liang","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Physical function is a key determinant of independence among older adults. Yet, there are barriers to assessing physical function in clinic. We developed a wearable geriatric functional assessment system (GFAS) that quickly and effortlessly evaluates physical function. Methods A single-arm, non-randomized, mixed-methods, usability study evaluated the design, ergonomics, and usability of the GFAS. Participants aged >65 years with multiple chronic conditions were recruited and wore the GFAS about the clinic for 15-minutes. We assessed walking speed, 30-second sit-to-stand, and evaluated postural balance using a Footscan pressure plate system. In addition to transcribed exit-interviews and a Willingness to Pay questionnaire, the USE, Technology Acceptance, and System Usability Scales were evaluated. Results Of the 37 participants screened, 21 were recruited, enrolled, and consented, whose mean age was 76.6±5.45 years (52.4% female), with 28.6% non-White, 19% were on Medicaid, and 52.4% were classified as having a robust Fried frailty status. Participants favored the prototype and its existing functionality (7.14±2.35) and would wear it if recommended by their clinician (7.62±2.50, median 8.0). All felt it was easy to use, 74% of comments outlined they would use it again, and 81% noted it was comfortable. System Usability score was 78.2 ± 14.5, USE was 5.83 ± 3.59, and Technology Acceptance demonstrated satisfaction of 7.05 ± 2.18 in using the device. Conclusions The GFAS prototype shows considerable promise in evaluating physical function in older adults and that additional steps are needed to maximize usability.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Preliminary Usability Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-based, motion-detecting Wearable device: the Geriatric Functional Assessment System\",\"authors\":\"John A Batsis, Rishank Singh, Jennifer Poole, Paige Bramblett, Danae Gross, Meredith Gilliam, Chaterlee Pamintuan, Beckham Nora, David H Lynch, Xiaohui Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glaf044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Physical function is a key determinant of independence among older adults. Yet, there are barriers to assessing physical function in clinic. We developed a wearable geriatric functional assessment system (GFAS) that quickly and effortlessly evaluates physical function. Methods A single-arm, non-randomized, mixed-methods, usability study evaluated the design, ergonomics, and usability of the GFAS. Participants aged >65 years with multiple chronic conditions were recruited and wore the GFAS about the clinic for 15-minutes. We assessed walking speed, 30-second sit-to-stand, and evaluated postural balance using a Footscan pressure plate system. In addition to transcribed exit-interviews and a Willingness to Pay questionnaire, the USE, Technology Acceptance, and System Usability Scales were evaluated. Results Of the 37 participants screened, 21 were recruited, enrolled, and consented, whose mean age was 76.6±5.45 years (52.4% female), with 28.6% non-White, 19% were on Medicaid, and 52.4% were classified as having a robust Fried frailty status. Participants favored the prototype and its existing functionality (7.14±2.35) and would wear it if recommended by their clinician (7.62±2.50, median 8.0). All felt it was easy to use, 74% of comments outlined they would use it again, and 81% noted it was comfortable. System Usability score was 78.2 ± 14.5, USE was 5.83 ± 3.59, and Technology Acceptance demonstrated satisfaction of 7.05 ± 2.18 in using the device. Conclusions The GFAS prototype shows considerable promise in evaluating physical function in older adults and that additional steps are needed to maximize usability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:身体机能是老年人独立性的关键决定因素。然而,临床对身体功能的评估存在障碍。我们开发了一种可穿戴的老年功能评估系统(GFAS),可以快速、轻松地评估身体功能。方法一项单臂、非随机、混合方法的可用性研究评估了gas的设计、人体工程学和可用性。研究人员招募了年龄在65岁以上、患有多种慢性疾病的参与者,并让他们在诊所里佩戴GFAS 15分钟。我们使用Footscan压力板系统评估步行速度、30秒坐姿到站立以及姿势平衡。除了转录的退出访谈和支付意愿问卷之外,还评估了使用、技术接受和系统可用性量表。结果在筛选的37名参与者中,有21人被招募、登记并同意,他们的平均年龄为76.6±5.45岁(52.4%为女性),其中28.6%为非白人,19%为医疗补助,52.4%被归类为具有强健的Fried虚弱状态。参与者喜欢原型及其现有功能(7.14±2.35),如果临床医生推荐,他们会佩戴它(7.62±2.50,中位数8.0)。所有人都认为它很容易使用,74%的评论表示他们会再次使用它,81%的评论认为它很舒服。系统可用性评分为78.2±14.5,USE评分为5.83±3.59,技术接受度评分为7.05±2.18。结论:GFAS原型在评估老年人身体功能方面显示出相当大的前景,但需要进一步提高可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Preliminary Usability Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-based, motion-detecting Wearable device: the Geriatric Functional Assessment System
Background Physical function is a key determinant of independence among older adults. Yet, there are barriers to assessing physical function in clinic. We developed a wearable geriatric functional assessment system (GFAS) that quickly and effortlessly evaluates physical function. Methods A single-arm, non-randomized, mixed-methods, usability study evaluated the design, ergonomics, and usability of the GFAS. Participants aged >65 years with multiple chronic conditions were recruited and wore the GFAS about the clinic for 15-minutes. We assessed walking speed, 30-second sit-to-stand, and evaluated postural balance using a Footscan pressure plate system. In addition to transcribed exit-interviews and a Willingness to Pay questionnaire, the USE, Technology Acceptance, and System Usability Scales were evaluated. Results Of the 37 participants screened, 21 were recruited, enrolled, and consented, whose mean age was 76.6±5.45 years (52.4% female), with 28.6% non-White, 19% were on Medicaid, and 52.4% were classified as having a robust Fried frailty status. Participants favored the prototype and its existing functionality (7.14±2.35) and would wear it if recommended by their clinician (7.62±2.50, median 8.0). All felt it was easy to use, 74% of comments outlined they would use it again, and 81% noted it was comfortable. System Usability score was 78.2 ± 14.5, USE was 5.83 ± 3.59, and Technology Acceptance demonstrated satisfaction of 7.05 ± 2.18 in using the device. Conclusions The GFAS prototype shows considerable promise in evaluating physical function in older adults and that additional steps are needed to maximize usability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信