提高定量大数据清理公平性的议定书:来自代表性不足和边缘化社区的电子健康记录纵向分析的经验教训

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zeruiah V Buchanan, Scarlett E Hopkins, Bert B Boyer, Alison E Fohner
{"title":"提高定量大数据清理公平性的议定书:来自代表性不足和边缘化社区的电子健康记录纵向分析的经验教训","authors":"Zeruiah V Buchanan, Scarlett E Hopkins, Bert B Boyer, Alison E Fohner","doi":"10.1093/ije/dyaf013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Large biomedical datasets, including electronic health records (EHRs), are a significant source of epidemiologic data. To prepare an EHR for analysis, there are several data-cleaning approaches; here, we focus on data filtering. Common data-filtering methods employ rules that rely on data from socially constructed dominant populations but are inappropriate for marginalized populations, leading to the loss of valuable data and neglect of underrepresented communities. We propose a novel method based on a phenomenological framework that is more equitable and inclusive, leading to culturally responsive research and discoveries. Methods EHRs from the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation (YKHC) containing 1 262 035 records from 12 402 unique individuals from 2002 to 2012 were cleaned by using the proposed phenomenological (individual) and common (cohort) data-filtering approach. Within the phenomenological framework, we (i) excluded values that were undeniably biologically impossible for any population, (ii) excludes values that fell outside three standard deviations from the mean value for each individual person, and (iii) used two forms of imputation methods for stable quantitative and qualitative values at the individual level when data were missing. Results Compared with common data-filtering practices, the phenomenological approach retained more observations, participants, and a range of outcomes, allowing a truer representation of the priority population. In sensitivity analyses comparing the results of the raw data, the common approach implemented, and the phenomenological approach applied, we found that the phenomenological approach did not compromise the integrity of the results. Conclusion The phenomenological approach to filtering big data presents an opportunity to better advocate for marginalized communities even when using large datasets that require automated rules for data filtering. Our method may empower researchers who are partnering with communities to embrace large datasets without compromising their commitment to community benefit and respect.","PeriodicalId":14147,"journal":{"name":"International journal of epidemiology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocol for improving equity in quantitative big data cleaning: lessons from longitudinal analysis of electronic health records from underrepresented and marginalized communities\",\"authors\":\"Zeruiah V Buchanan, Scarlett E Hopkins, Bert B Boyer, Alison E Fohner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ije/dyaf013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Large biomedical datasets, including electronic health records (EHRs), are a significant source of epidemiologic data. To prepare an EHR for analysis, there are several data-cleaning approaches; here, we focus on data filtering. Common data-filtering methods employ rules that rely on data from socially constructed dominant populations but are inappropriate for marginalized populations, leading to the loss of valuable data and neglect of underrepresented communities. We propose a novel method based on a phenomenological framework that is more equitable and inclusive, leading to culturally responsive research and discoveries. Methods EHRs from the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation (YKHC) containing 1 262 035 records from 12 402 unique individuals from 2002 to 2012 were cleaned by using the proposed phenomenological (individual) and common (cohort) data-filtering approach. Within the phenomenological framework, we (i) excluded values that were undeniably biologically impossible for any population, (ii) excludes values that fell outside three standard deviations from the mean value for each individual person, and (iii) used two forms of imputation methods for stable quantitative and qualitative values at the individual level when data were missing. Results Compared with common data-filtering practices, the phenomenological approach retained more observations, participants, and a range of outcomes, allowing a truer representation of the priority population. In sensitivity analyses comparing the results of the raw data, the common approach implemented, and the phenomenological approach applied, we found that the phenomenological approach did not compromise the integrity of the results. Conclusion The phenomenological approach to filtering big data presents an opportunity to better advocate for marginalized communities even when using large datasets that require automated rules for data filtering. Our method may empower researchers who are partnering with communities to embrace large datasets without compromising their commitment to community benefit and respect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaf013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaf013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 大型生物医学数据集,包括电子健康记录(EHR),是流行病学数据的重要来源。为了对电子健康记录进行分析,有几种数据清理方法;在此,我们重点讨论数据过滤。常见的数据过滤方法采用的规则依赖于社会构建的优势人群数据,但不适合边缘化人群,从而导致宝贵数据的丢失和对代表性不足人群的忽视。我们提出了一种基于现象学框架的新方法,这种方法更公平、更具包容性,可促进文化适应性研究和发现。方法 通过使用建议的现象学(个体)和共同(队列)数据过滤方法,对育空-库斯科克温卫生公司(YKHC)的电子病历进行了清理,这些病历包含 2002 年至 2012 年间 12 402 个独特个体的 1 262 035 条记录。在现象学框架内,我们(i) 排除了任何人群在生物学上不可能存在的数值,(ii) 排除了与每个人的平均值相差三个标准差之外的数值,(iii) 在数据缺失的情况下,使用两种形式的估算方法来估算个体水平上稳定的定量和定性数值。结果 与常见的数据筛选方法相比,现象学方法保留了更多的观察结果、参与者和一系列结果,从而更真实地反映了优先人群。在对原始数据、采用的普通方法和采用的现象学方法的结果进行敏感性分析比较时,我们发现现象学方法并没有损害结果的完整性。结论 过滤大数据的现象学方法提供了一个机会,即使在使用需要自动规则进行数据过滤的大型数据集时,也能更好地为边缘化群体代言。我们的方法可能会让与社区合作的研究人员有能力接受大型数据集,而不会损害他们对社区利益和尊重的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protocol for improving equity in quantitative big data cleaning: lessons from longitudinal analysis of electronic health records from underrepresented and marginalized communities
Background Large biomedical datasets, including electronic health records (EHRs), are a significant source of epidemiologic data. To prepare an EHR for analysis, there are several data-cleaning approaches; here, we focus on data filtering. Common data-filtering methods employ rules that rely on data from socially constructed dominant populations but are inappropriate for marginalized populations, leading to the loss of valuable data and neglect of underrepresented communities. We propose a novel method based on a phenomenological framework that is more equitable and inclusive, leading to culturally responsive research and discoveries. Methods EHRs from the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation (YKHC) containing 1 262 035 records from 12 402 unique individuals from 2002 to 2012 were cleaned by using the proposed phenomenological (individual) and common (cohort) data-filtering approach. Within the phenomenological framework, we (i) excluded values that were undeniably biologically impossible for any population, (ii) excludes values that fell outside three standard deviations from the mean value for each individual person, and (iii) used two forms of imputation methods for stable quantitative and qualitative values at the individual level when data were missing. Results Compared with common data-filtering practices, the phenomenological approach retained more observations, participants, and a range of outcomes, allowing a truer representation of the priority population. In sensitivity analyses comparing the results of the raw data, the common approach implemented, and the phenomenological approach applied, we found that the phenomenological approach did not compromise the integrity of the results. Conclusion The phenomenological approach to filtering big data presents an opportunity to better advocate for marginalized communities even when using large datasets that require automated rules for data filtering. Our method may empower researchers who are partnering with communities to embrace large datasets without compromising their commitment to community benefit and respect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of epidemiology
International journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
2.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Epidemiology is a vital resource for individuals seeking to stay updated on the latest advancements and emerging trends in the field of epidemiology worldwide. The journal fosters communication among researchers, educators, and practitioners involved in the study, teaching, and application of epidemiology pertaining to both communicable and non-communicable diseases. It also includes research on health services and medical care. Furthermore, the journal presents new methodologies in epidemiology and statistics, catering to professionals working in social and preventive medicine. Published six times a year, the International Journal of Epidemiology provides a comprehensive platform for the analysis of data. Overall, this journal is an indispensable tool for staying informed and connected within the dynamic realm of epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信