2019-2022年肿瘤专家电子病历收件箱工作的国家趋势

A Jay Holmgren, Nate C Apathy, Jennie Crews, Tait Shanafelt
{"title":"2019-2022年肿瘤专家电子病历收件箱工作的国家趋势","authors":"A Jay Holmgren, Nate C Apathy, Jennie Crews, Tait Shanafelt","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Electronic health record (EHR) burden is an important driver of the ongoing physician burnout crisis. EHR-based messaging (also known as inbox) in particular, including messages from patients, is associated with burnout and decreased well-being. Little is known regarding EHR messaging burden for oncologists. To address this, we assessed trends in oncologist EHR messaging volume and EHR time from 2019-2022 across oncology sub-specialties. Methods This study used EHR metadata for all US oncology physicians (including medical oncologist/hematologists, radiation oncologists, pediatric oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, and surgical oncologists) providing ambulatory care using an Epic EHR to measure inbox volume and EHR time from July 2019 through April 2022. Descriptive statistics and multi-variable regression were used to evaluate differences over time and across sub-specialties. Results This sample of 15,653 oncology physicians across 43,228,633 ambulatory visits found that message volume for oncologists increased 19.0% from 2019 to 2022, and patient-initiated messages increased 34.0%. EHR time increased 16.2% from 2019 to 2022, while EHR “work outside of work” time increased 12.1%. Medical oncologist/hematologists had the highest inbox volume, patient-message volume, and EHR time of oncology sub-specialists. Conclusion Rising levels of EHR work and message volume among oncology physicians are concerning given the role of EHR burden in physician burnout. Oncologists have seen increased EHR time and message volume, especially patient-initiated messages, following the onset of the COVID pandemic. Health system leaders and policymakers should invest in efforts to reduce EHR and inbox burden for all oncologists, with a focus on those with the greatest burden.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National trends in oncology specialists’ EHR inbox work, 2019–2022\",\"authors\":\"A Jay Holmgren, Nate C Apathy, Jennie Crews, Tait Shanafelt\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djaf052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Electronic health record (EHR) burden is an important driver of the ongoing physician burnout crisis. EHR-based messaging (also known as inbox) in particular, including messages from patients, is associated with burnout and decreased well-being. Little is known regarding EHR messaging burden for oncologists. To address this, we assessed trends in oncologist EHR messaging volume and EHR time from 2019-2022 across oncology sub-specialties. Methods This study used EHR metadata for all US oncology physicians (including medical oncologist/hematologists, radiation oncologists, pediatric oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, and surgical oncologists) providing ambulatory care using an Epic EHR to measure inbox volume and EHR time from July 2019 through April 2022. Descriptive statistics and multi-variable regression were used to evaluate differences over time and across sub-specialties. Results This sample of 15,653 oncology physicians across 43,228,633 ambulatory visits found that message volume for oncologists increased 19.0% from 2019 to 2022, and patient-initiated messages increased 34.0%. EHR time increased 16.2% from 2019 to 2022, while EHR “work outside of work” time increased 12.1%. Medical oncologist/hematologists had the highest inbox volume, patient-message volume, and EHR time of oncology sub-specialists. Conclusion Rising levels of EHR work and message volume among oncology physicians are concerning given the role of EHR burden in physician burnout. Oncologists have seen increased EHR time and message volume, especially patient-initiated messages, following the onset of the COVID pandemic. Health system leaders and policymakers should invest in efforts to reduce EHR and inbox burden for all oncologists, with a focus on those with the greatest burden.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景电子健康记录(EHR)负担是当前医生职业倦怠危机的一个重要驱动因素。特别是基于电子病历的信息(也称为收件箱),包括来自患者的信息,与倦怠和幸福感下降有关。对于肿瘤学家的电子病历信息负担知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,我们评估了2019-2022年肿瘤学亚专科的肿瘤学家电子病历信息量和电子病历时间的趋势。方法:本研究使用Epic EHR对2019年7月至2022年4月期间提供门诊护理的所有美国肿瘤医生(包括内科肿瘤学家/血液学家、放射肿瘤学家、儿科肿瘤学家、妇科肿瘤学家和外科肿瘤学家)的电子病历元数据进行测量,以测量收件箱数量和电子病历时间。使用描述性统计和多变量回归来评估随时间和跨亚专业的差异。该样本包括15653名肿瘤科医生,共进行了4328.633次门诊就诊,结果发现,从2019年到2022年,肿瘤科医生的信息量增长了19.0%,患者发起的信息增长了34.0%。从2019年到2022年,EHR时间增加了16.2%,而EHR“工作以外的工作”时间增加了12.1%。肿瘤科/血液科医生的收件箱数量、患者信息数量和电子病历时间在肿瘤科专科医生中最高。结论鉴于电子病历负担在医师职业倦怠中的作用,肿瘤医师电子病历工作水平和信息量的上升与此有关。在COVID大流行爆发后,肿瘤学家发现电子病历的时间和信息量都有所增加,尤其是患者发起的信息。卫生系统领导人和政策制定者应努力减少所有肿瘤学家的电子病历和收件箱负担,重点关注那些负担最重的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National trends in oncology specialists’ EHR inbox work, 2019–2022
Background Electronic health record (EHR) burden is an important driver of the ongoing physician burnout crisis. EHR-based messaging (also known as inbox) in particular, including messages from patients, is associated with burnout and decreased well-being. Little is known regarding EHR messaging burden for oncologists. To address this, we assessed trends in oncologist EHR messaging volume and EHR time from 2019-2022 across oncology sub-specialties. Methods This study used EHR metadata for all US oncology physicians (including medical oncologist/hematologists, radiation oncologists, pediatric oncologists, gynecologic oncologists, and surgical oncologists) providing ambulatory care using an Epic EHR to measure inbox volume and EHR time from July 2019 through April 2022. Descriptive statistics and multi-variable regression were used to evaluate differences over time and across sub-specialties. Results This sample of 15,653 oncology physicians across 43,228,633 ambulatory visits found that message volume for oncologists increased 19.0% from 2019 to 2022, and patient-initiated messages increased 34.0%. EHR time increased 16.2% from 2019 to 2022, while EHR “work outside of work” time increased 12.1%. Medical oncologist/hematologists had the highest inbox volume, patient-message volume, and EHR time of oncology sub-specialists. Conclusion Rising levels of EHR work and message volume among oncology physicians are concerning given the role of EHR burden in physician burnout. Oncologists have seen increased EHR time and message volume, especially patient-initiated messages, following the onset of the COVID pandemic. Health system leaders and policymakers should invest in efforts to reduce EHR and inbox burden for all oncologists, with a focus on those with the greatest burden.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信