国家橄榄球联盟中铲球运动员脑震荡的铲球技术和特征

Christopher P. Sherwood, Fintan Grogan, Timothy L. McMurry, James R. Funk, Jeff R. Crandall, Allen Sills, Gregory Tierney
{"title":"国家橄榄球联盟中铲球运动员脑震荡的铲球技术和特征","authors":"Christopher P. Sherwood, Fintan Grogan, Timothy L. McMurry, James R. Funk, Jeff R. Crandall, Allen Sills, Gregory Tierney","doi":"10.1177/03635465251321005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Concussions remain a major concern in football. A qualitative video review can provide contextual evidence supporting changes in rules and coaching techniques aimed at reducing the risk of players sustaining a concussion.Purpose:To identify tackling techniques and characteristics associated with concussions to the tackling player.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A qualitative review of 51 concussions sustained by tacklers in National Football League (NFL) games between the 2015 and 2019 seasons as well as 96 control tackles was performed using video from multiple perspectives. For each concussive case, 1 to 3 nonconcussive control tackles were matched based on player trajectory and closing speed as determined from on-field player tracking data from Next Gen Stats. Cases and controls were coded for 20 different tackle techniques and characteristics. The data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression models, and the results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as well as adjusted and unadjusted P values.Results:Despite attempting to match cases and controls based on closing velocity, closing velocity was significantly associated with the concussion risk in every logistic regression model. Predictors that had the greatest effect on the increased risk of concussions were “tackler leading with helmet” (OR, 5.18 [95% CI, 1.87-14.33]; false discovery rate [FDR]–adjusted P = .0032) and “tackler primary loading” being the helmet as opposed to the shoulder (OR, 4.61 [95% CI, 1.41-15.05]; FDR-adjusted P = .0000). Important factors associated with a reduced concussion risk were the tackler’s “head placed on correct side” of the ball carrier (OR, 4.17 [95% CI, 1.58-11.01]; FDR-adjusted P = .0088) and “ball carrier primary loading,” with the torso having the lowest risk relative to all other body segments.Conclusion:The less a tackler involved his helmet in a tackle, the lower his risk of sustaining a concussion. This study supports teaching players to place their heads on the correct side of the ball carrier (neither into the ball carrier nor into the path of the ball carrier) when tackling to reduce their risk of a concussion, and players should target the torso of the ball carrier as their primary contact point.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tackle Techniques and Characteristics Associated With a Concussion in Tackling Players in the National Football League\",\"authors\":\"Christopher P. Sherwood, Fintan Grogan, Timothy L. McMurry, James R. Funk, Jeff R. Crandall, Allen Sills, Gregory Tierney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465251321005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Concussions remain a major concern in football. A qualitative video review can provide contextual evidence supporting changes in rules and coaching techniques aimed at reducing the risk of players sustaining a concussion.Purpose:To identify tackling techniques and characteristics associated with concussions to the tackling player.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A qualitative review of 51 concussions sustained by tacklers in National Football League (NFL) games between the 2015 and 2019 seasons as well as 96 control tackles was performed using video from multiple perspectives. For each concussive case, 1 to 3 nonconcussive control tackles were matched based on player trajectory and closing speed as determined from on-field player tracking data from Next Gen Stats. Cases and controls were coded for 20 different tackle techniques and characteristics. The data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression models, and the results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as well as adjusted and unadjusted P values.Results:Despite attempting to match cases and controls based on closing velocity, closing velocity was significantly associated with the concussion risk in every logistic regression model. Predictors that had the greatest effect on the increased risk of concussions were “tackler leading with helmet” (OR, 5.18 [95% CI, 1.87-14.33]; false discovery rate [FDR]–adjusted P = .0032) and “tackler primary loading” being the helmet as opposed to the shoulder (OR, 4.61 [95% CI, 1.41-15.05]; FDR-adjusted P = .0000). Important factors associated with a reduced concussion risk were the tackler’s “head placed on correct side” of the ball carrier (OR, 4.17 [95% CI, 1.58-11.01]; FDR-adjusted P = .0088) and “ball carrier primary loading,” with the torso having the lowest risk relative to all other body segments.Conclusion:The less a tackler involved his helmet in a tackle, the lower his risk of sustaining a concussion. This study supports teaching players to place their heads on the correct side of the ball carrier (neither into the ball carrier nor into the path of the ball carrier) when tackling to reduce their risk of a concussion, and players should target the torso of the ball carrier as their primary contact point.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251321005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251321005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑震荡仍然是足球的一个主要问题。定性视频回顾可以提供背景证据,支持规则和教练技术的变化,旨在减少球员遭受脑震荡的风险。目的:确定铲球运动员脑震荡的铲球技术和特征。研究设计:病例对照研究;证据水平,3。方法:对2015 - 2019赛季美国国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)比赛中51名抢断队员的脑震荡以及96名控制性抢断进行定性分析,并从多个角度进行视频分析。对于每个脑震荡病例,根据Next Gen Stats的现场球员跟踪数据确定的球员轨迹和接近速度,匹配1到3个非脑震荡控制铲球。病例和对照针对20种不同的处理技术和特征进行编码。采用条件logistic回归模型对数据进行分析,结果用95%置信区间(ci)的比值比(ORs)以及调整和未调整的P值表示。结果:尽管试图根据闭合速度匹配病例和对照组,但在每个逻辑回归模型中,闭合速度与脑震荡风险显著相关。对脑震荡风险增加影响最大的预测因子是“带头盔的抢断者”(OR, 5.18 [95% CI, 1.87-14.33];假发现率[FDR]调整后的P = 0.0032),“铲球者的主要负荷”是头盔而不是肩膀(OR, 4.61 [95% CI, 1.41-15.05];经罗斯福调整的P = 0.00000)。与降低脑震荡风险相关的重要因素是铲球者的“头部位于持球者的正确一侧”(OR, 4.17 [95% CI, 1.58-11.01];经fdr调整的P = 0.0088)和“球载体主要负荷”,躯干相对于所有其他身体部位的风险最低。结论:铲球者在铲球时越少使用头盔,他遭受脑震荡的风险就越低。这项研究支持教导球员在铲球时将他们的头放在持球者的正确一侧(既不要进入持球者也不要进入持球者的路径),以减少他们脑震荡的风险,球员应该将持球者的躯干作为他们的主要接触点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tackle Techniques and Characteristics Associated With a Concussion in Tackling Players in the National Football League
Background:Concussions remain a major concern in football. A qualitative video review can provide contextual evidence supporting changes in rules and coaching techniques aimed at reducing the risk of players sustaining a concussion.Purpose:To identify tackling techniques and characteristics associated with concussions to the tackling player.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A qualitative review of 51 concussions sustained by tacklers in National Football League (NFL) games between the 2015 and 2019 seasons as well as 96 control tackles was performed using video from multiple perspectives. For each concussive case, 1 to 3 nonconcussive control tackles were matched based on player trajectory and closing speed as determined from on-field player tracking data from Next Gen Stats. Cases and controls were coded for 20 different tackle techniques and characteristics. The data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression models, and the results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as well as adjusted and unadjusted P values.Results:Despite attempting to match cases and controls based on closing velocity, closing velocity was significantly associated with the concussion risk in every logistic regression model. Predictors that had the greatest effect on the increased risk of concussions were “tackler leading with helmet” (OR, 5.18 [95% CI, 1.87-14.33]; false discovery rate [FDR]–adjusted P = .0032) and “tackler primary loading” being the helmet as opposed to the shoulder (OR, 4.61 [95% CI, 1.41-15.05]; FDR-adjusted P = .0000). Important factors associated with a reduced concussion risk were the tackler’s “head placed on correct side” of the ball carrier (OR, 4.17 [95% CI, 1.58-11.01]; FDR-adjusted P = .0088) and “ball carrier primary loading,” with the torso having the lowest risk relative to all other body segments.Conclusion:The less a tackler involved his helmet in a tackle, the lower his risk of sustaining a concussion. This study supports teaching players to place their heads on the correct side of the ball carrier (neither into the ball carrier nor into the path of the ball carrier) when tackling to reduce their risk of a concussion, and players should target the torso of the ball carrier as their primary contact point.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信