常见变量对灭鼠屏障计划中高压灭菌器最佳实践的影响。

Hannah E Skolnik, Clifford R Roberts, Don R Mabunga, Krista E Lindstrom
{"title":"常见变量对灭鼠屏障计划中高压灭菌器最佳实践的影响。","authors":"Hannah E Skolnik, Clifford R Roberts, Don R Mabunga, Krista E Lindstrom","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To maintain rodent colonies free from harmful infectious agents, laboratory animal care programs frequently employ the use of sterilized caging and supplies. Sterilized caging is important for preventing the spread of infectious pathogens from contaminated fomites, for biocontainment, and for safety. We designed several experiments to determine the effects of commonly encountered processes on steam penetration and substrate heat exposure. We used biologic indicators as a proxy for steam penetration. We used the time bedding spent above 121 °C as a proxy for substrate cumulative heat exposure. This temperature was measured using a high-temperature data logger. We first examined the effect of stacking cages with various bedding types on steam penetration. We then autoclaved soiled bedding and studied the variables of bedding type, bagging style, presence of diet and water in the cage, and amount of time between cage change out on steam penetration and cumulative heat exposure. For clean bedding, we found adequate steam penetration regardless of bedding type, cycle program, or location of the cage in the bulk autoclave. For the soiled bedding experiments, there were no differences between bedding types noted. Placement of cages inside plastic bagging increased the amount of time the bedding spent above 121 °C on average but not significantly. There was no difference in steam penetration of bedding or time spent above 121 °C for 2- or 4-wk cage change-out schedules. When cages were autoclaved with diet and water, the time the bedding spent above 121 °C was significantly less than when autoclaving bedding alone, but there was adequate steam penetration for all cages. This study demonstrates that common practices in the industry are effective. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that each institution evaluate their autoclaving practices and confirm that those practices are sufficient and effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":"64 1","pages":"166-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Common Variables on Autoclave Best Practices in Rodent Barrier Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah E Skolnik, Clifford R Roberts, Don R Mabunga, Krista E Lindstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To maintain rodent colonies free from harmful infectious agents, laboratory animal care programs frequently employ the use of sterilized caging and supplies. Sterilized caging is important for preventing the spread of infectious pathogens from contaminated fomites, for biocontainment, and for safety. We designed several experiments to determine the effects of commonly encountered processes on steam penetration and substrate heat exposure. We used biologic indicators as a proxy for steam penetration. We used the time bedding spent above 121 °C as a proxy for substrate cumulative heat exposure. This temperature was measured using a high-temperature data logger. We first examined the effect of stacking cages with various bedding types on steam penetration. We then autoclaved soiled bedding and studied the variables of bedding type, bagging style, presence of diet and water in the cage, and amount of time between cage change out on steam penetration and cumulative heat exposure. For clean bedding, we found adequate steam penetration regardless of bedding type, cycle program, or location of the cage in the bulk autoclave. For the soiled bedding experiments, there were no differences between bedding types noted. Placement of cages inside plastic bagging increased the amount of time the bedding spent above 121 °C on average but not significantly. There was no difference in steam penetration of bedding or time spent above 121 °C for 2- or 4-wk cage change-out schedules. When cages were autoclaved with diet and water, the time the bedding spent above 121 °C was significantly less than when autoclaving bedding alone, but there was adequate steam penetration for all cages. This study demonstrates that common practices in the industry are effective. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that each institution evaluate their autoclaving practices and confirm that those practices are sufficient and effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"166-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808364/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了使啮齿动物不受有害传染病的影响,实验室动物护理项目经常使用消毒的笼子和用品。灭菌笼对于防止传染性病原体从受污染的污染物中传播、生物防护和安全都很重要。我们设计了几个实验来确定常见的工艺对蒸汽渗透和基材热暴露的影响。我们使用生物指标作为蒸汽渗透的代表。我们使用在121°C以上度过的时间作为基材累积热暴露的代理。这个温度是用高温数据记录仪测量的。首先考察了不同层理类型的堆垛笼对蒸汽渗透的影响。然后,我们对被污染的床上用品进行高压灭菌,并研究了床上用品类型、装袋方式、笼中饲料和水的存在,以及笼换笼之间的时间间隔对蒸汽渗透和累积热暴露的影响。对于清洁的床层,我们发现无论床层类型、循环程序或保持架在散装高压灭菌器中的位置如何,都有足够的蒸汽渗透力。在有脏层理试验中,不同层理类型间无差异。在塑料袋中放置笼子会增加床上用品在121°C以上的平均时间,但不显著。在2周或4周的笼子更换计划中,床层的蒸汽渗透率或在121°C以上度过的时间没有差异。当用饲料和水对笼子进行高压灭菌时,床上用品在121°C以上的时间明显少于单独对床上用品进行高压灭菌的时间,但所有笼子都有足够的蒸汽穿透。本研究表明,行业中常见的做法是有效的。基于这项研究的结果,建议每个机构评估他们的高压灭菌实践,并确认这些实践是充分和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Common Variables on Autoclave Best Practices in Rodent Barrier Programs.

To maintain rodent colonies free from harmful infectious agents, laboratory animal care programs frequently employ the use of sterilized caging and supplies. Sterilized caging is important for preventing the spread of infectious pathogens from contaminated fomites, for biocontainment, and for safety. We designed several experiments to determine the effects of commonly encountered processes on steam penetration and substrate heat exposure. We used biologic indicators as a proxy for steam penetration. We used the time bedding spent above 121 °C as a proxy for substrate cumulative heat exposure. This temperature was measured using a high-temperature data logger. We first examined the effect of stacking cages with various bedding types on steam penetration. We then autoclaved soiled bedding and studied the variables of bedding type, bagging style, presence of diet and water in the cage, and amount of time between cage change out on steam penetration and cumulative heat exposure. For clean bedding, we found adequate steam penetration regardless of bedding type, cycle program, or location of the cage in the bulk autoclave. For the soiled bedding experiments, there were no differences between bedding types noted. Placement of cages inside plastic bagging increased the amount of time the bedding spent above 121 °C on average but not significantly. There was no difference in steam penetration of bedding or time spent above 121 °C for 2- or 4-wk cage change-out schedules. When cages were autoclaved with diet and water, the time the bedding spent above 121 °C was significantly less than when autoclaving bedding alone, but there was adequate steam penetration for all cages. This study demonstrates that common practices in the industry are effective. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that each institution evaluate their autoclaving practices and confirm that those practices are sufficient and effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信