妇女接触厨房烹饪排放物与慢性阻塞性肺病:布基纳法索瓦加杜古一项基于人群的病例对照研究

IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Pan African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11604/pamj.2024.49.88.43238
Adama Sana, Benoit Kafando, Nicolas Meda, Catherine Bouland
{"title":"妇女接触厨房烹饪排放物与慢性阻塞性肺病:布基纳法索瓦加杜古一项基于人群的病例对照研究","authors":"Adama Sana, Benoit Kafando, Nicolas Meda, Catherine Bouland","doi":"10.11604/pamj.2024.49.88.43238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>women exposed to smoke are three times more likely to suffer from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than women who cook with clean fuels. The present study aims to compare the level of exposure to particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>), carbon monoxide (CO), and total volatile organic compounds (VOCs) inside kitchens, between women with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and healthy women, in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a pilot case-control study was conducted from January 7<sup>th</sup> to 25<sup>th</sup>, 2020, in 2 neighborhoods of Ouagadougou. Cases were women diagnosed with COPD and controls were women without COPD. The diagnosis of COPD was made on the basis of a standardized questionnaire administered and followed by a spirometry test. The sample comprised 9 cases and 9 controls. Exposure was assessed by using a multi-pollutant hand-held device, over a 24-hour period. Exposures of cases and controls were compared using the independent Student's t-test and in cases where the distribution was not normal, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the mean age was 59 ± 9.86 years in the cases group and 58.56 ± 7.45 years in the control group and there is no significant difference (p = 0.757). The mean concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> measured in the 2 groups were above the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended threshold of 15 µg/m<sup>3</sup> for 24 h exposure. The mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration was 127.10 µg/m<sup>3</sup> in the cases and 16.23 µg/m<sup>3</sup> in the control group (p= 0.133). Concentrations of CO and VOCs were also higher in the kitchens of the cases than in those of the controls. However, no differences were statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>although no statistically significant differences were observed, pollutant concentrations were higher in the kitchens of women with COPD. In addition, PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels measured in both groups exceeded WHO-recommended thresholds, underlining the need to reduce household exposure to pollutants. Further research is needed to better understand these impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48190,"journal":{"name":"Pan African Medical Journal","volume":"49 ","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exposure to cooking emissions in kitchens and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in women: a population-based case-control study in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.\",\"authors\":\"Adama Sana, Benoit Kafando, Nicolas Meda, Catherine Bouland\",\"doi\":\"10.11604/pamj.2024.49.88.43238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>women exposed to smoke are three times more likely to suffer from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than women who cook with clean fuels. The present study aims to compare the level of exposure to particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>), carbon monoxide (CO), and total volatile organic compounds (VOCs) inside kitchens, between women with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and healthy women, in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a pilot case-control study was conducted from January 7<sup>th</sup> to 25<sup>th</sup>, 2020, in 2 neighborhoods of Ouagadougou. Cases were women diagnosed with COPD and controls were women without COPD. The diagnosis of COPD was made on the basis of a standardized questionnaire administered and followed by a spirometry test. The sample comprised 9 cases and 9 controls. Exposure was assessed by using a multi-pollutant hand-held device, over a 24-hour period. Exposures of cases and controls were compared using the independent Student's t-test and in cases where the distribution was not normal, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the mean age was 59 ± 9.86 years in the cases group and 58.56 ± 7.45 years in the control group and there is no significant difference (p = 0.757). The mean concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> measured in the 2 groups were above the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended threshold of 15 µg/m<sup>3</sup> for 24 h exposure. The mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration was 127.10 µg/m<sup>3</sup> in the cases and 16.23 µg/m<sup>3</sup> in the control group (p= 0.133). Concentrations of CO and VOCs were also higher in the kitchens of the cases than in those of the controls. However, no differences were statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>although no statistically significant differences were observed, pollutant concentrations were higher in the kitchens of women with COPD. In addition, PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels measured in both groups exceeded WHO-recommended thresholds, underlining the need to reduce household exposure to pollutants. Further research is needed to better understand these impacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pan African Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pan African Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2024.49.88.43238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2024.49.88.43238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:接触烟雾的妇女患慢性阻塞性肺病的可能性是使用清洁燃料烹饪的妇女的三倍。本研究旨在比较布基纳法索瓦加杜古患有慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的妇女和健康妇女在厨房内接触颗粒物(PM2.5)、一氧化碳(CO)和总挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的水平。方法:2020年1月7日至25日在瓦加杜古2个社区开展病例对照试验研究。病例是诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病的女性,对照组是没有慢性阻塞性肺病的女性。COPD的诊断是在标准化问卷调查的基础上进行的,随后进行肺活量测定。样本包括9例病例和9个对照。在24小时内,通过使用多种污染物的手持设备评估暴露情况。病例和对照组的暴露比较使用独立的学生t检验,在分布不正常的情况下,使用Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果:病例组的平均年龄为59±9.86岁,对照组的平均年龄为58.56±7.45岁,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.757)。两组PM2.5平均浓度均高于世界卫生组织(WHO)建议的24 h暴露阈值15µg/m3。实验组PM2.5平均浓度为127.10µg/m3,对照组为16.23µg/m3 (p= 0.133)。这些家庭的厨房里CO和VOCs的浓度也高于对照组。然而,差异无统计学意义。结论:虽然没有观察到统计学上的显著差异,但慢性阻塞性肺病女性厨房的污染物浓度更高。此外,两组人群中测量到的PM2.5水平都超过了世卫组织建议的阈值,这凸显了减少家庭接触污染物的必要性。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解这些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exposure to cooking emissions in kitchens and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in women: a population-based case-control study in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Introduction: women exposed to smoke are three times more likely to suffer from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than women who cook with clean fuels. The present study aims to compare the level of exposure to particulate matter (PM2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), and total volatile organic compounds (VOCs) inside kitchens, between women with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and healthy women, in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Methods: a pilot case-control study was conducted from January 7th to 25th, 2020, in 2 neighborhoods of Ouagadougou. Cases were women diagnosed with COPD and controls were women without COPD. The diagnosis of COPD was made on the basis of a standardized questionnaire administered and followed by a spirometry test. The sample comprised 9 cases and 9 controls. Exposure was assessed by using a multi-pollutant hand-held device, over a 24-hour period. Exposures of cases and controls were compared using the independent Student's t-test and in cases where the distribution was not normal, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used.

Results: the mean age was 59 ± 9.86 years in the cases group and 58.56 ± 7.45 years in the control group and there is no significant difference (p = 0.757). The mean concentrations of PM2.5 measured in the 2 groups were above the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended threshold of 15 µg/m3 for 24 h exposure. The mean PM2.5 concentration was 127.10 µg/m3 in the cases and 16.23 µg/m3 in the control group (p= 0.133). Concentrations of CO and VOCs were also higher in the kitchens of the cases than in those of the controls. However, no differences were statistically significant.

Conclusion: although no statistically significant differences were observed, pollutant concentrations were higher in the kitchens of women with COPD. In addition, PM2.5 levels measured in both groups exceeded WHO-recommended thresholds, underlining the need to reduce household exposure to pollutants. Further research is needed to better understand these impacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pan African Medical Journal
Pan African Medical Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
691
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信