Ahmed Eliwa, Ali Aldarraji, Khaled Abdelwahab, Emad Salem
{"title":"比较射精保存HoLEP和标准HoLEP的随机前瞻性试验:硬币的另一面。","authors":"Ahmed Eliwa, Ali Aldarraji, Khaled Abdelwahab, Emad Salem","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05418-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laser Anatomical Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate (LAEEP) techniques offer a promising solution for patients seeking to alleviate urinary symptoms while preserving sexual function. The ejaculation preservation approach has been shown to achieve an impressive 90% success rate in maintaining antegrade ejaculation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the effect of the ejaculatory preservation HoLEP technique on postoperative continence and ejaculation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective randomized study adhering to CONSORT guidelines. Patients with prostate sizes between 40 and 80 gm, IPSS scores > 20, Qmax < 10 ml/s, and IIEF-5 scores > 22 were eligible for inclusion. A total of 43 patients were randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n = 22) underwent HoLEP, while Group 2 (n = 21) underwent EP HoLEP. We assessed functional outcomes and ejaculatory dysfunction at baseline and 1-, 3-, and 6- month. The study period was from October 2022 to March 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 40 patients were analyzed. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement in Group 1, with IPSS (median 12.5, P < 0.006) and Qmax (median 15, P < 0.04) at 3-month. ICIQ-UI SF scores showed a significant difference in the incontinence episodes (domain Q3), which were lower (P < 0.023) in Group 2 compared to Group 1 during the 1-month visit. MSHQ-EjD-SF scores were significantly higher in Group 2 at both 3- and 6- month (P < 0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively). IIEF-5 scores showed no significant difference between both groups during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing the ejaculation preservation technique during HoLEP appears to improve early postoperative continence and preserve ejaculation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized prospective trial comparing ejaculatory preservation HoLEP versus standard HoLEP: the other face of the coin.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Eliwa, Ali Aldarraji, Khaled Abdelwahab, Emad Salem\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-024-05418-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laser Anatomical Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate (LAEEP) techniques offer a promising solution for patients seeking to alleviate urinary symptoms while preserving sexual function. The ejaculation preservation approach has been shown to achieve an impressive 90% success rate in maintaining antegrade ejaculation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the effect of the ejaculatory preservation HoLEP technique on postoperative continence and ejaculation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective randomized study adhering to CONSORT guidelines. Patients with prostate sizes between 40 and 80 gm, IPSS scores > 20, Qmax < 10 ml/s, and IIEF-5 scores > 22 were eligible for inclusion. A total of 43 patients were randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n = 22) underwent HoLEP, while Group 2 (n = 21) underwent EP HoLEP. We assessed functional outcomes and ejaculatory dysfunction at baseline and 1-, 3-, and 6- month. The study period was from October 2022 to March 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 40 patients were analyzed. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement in Group 1, with IPSS (median 12.5, P < 0.006) and Qmax (median 15, P < 0.04) at 3-month. ICIQ-UI SF scores showed a significant difference in the incontinence episodes (domain Q3), which were lower (P < 0.023) in Group 2 compared to Group 1 during the 1-month visit. MSHQ-EjD-SF scores were significantly higher in Group 2 at both 3- and 6- month (P < 0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively). IIEF-5 scores showed no significant difference between both groups during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing the ejaculation preservation technique during HoLEP appears to improve early postoperative continence and preserve ejaculation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876214/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05418-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05418-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Randomized prospective trial comparing ejaculatory preservation HoLEP versus standard HoLEP: the other face of the coin.
Background: Laser Anatomical Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate (LAEEP) techniques offer a promising solution for patients seeking to alleviate urinary symptoms while preserving sexual function. The ejaculation preservation approach has been shown to achieve an impressive 90% success rate in maintaining antegrade ejaculation.
Purpose: To explore the effect of the ejaculatory preservation HoLEP technique on postoperative continence and ejaculation.
Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective randomized study adhering to CONSORT guidelines. Patients with prostate sizes between 40 and 80 gm, IPSS scores > 20, Qmax < 10 ml/s, and IIEF-5 scores > 22 were eligible for inclusion. A total of 43 patients were randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n = 22) underwent HoLEP, while Group 2 (n = 21) underwent EP HoLEP. We assessed functional outcomes and ejaculatory dysfunction at baseline and 1-, 3-, and 6- month. The study period was from October 2022 to March 2024.
Results: Data from 40 patients were analyzed. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement in Group 1, with IPSS (median 12.5, P < 0.006) and Qmax (median 15, P < 0.04) at 3-month. ICIQ-UI SF scores showed a significant difference in the incontinence episodes (domain Q3), which were lower (P < 0.023) in Group 2 compared to Group 1 during the 1-month visit. MSHQ-EjD-SF scores were significantly higher in Group 2 at both 3- and 6- month (P < 0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively). IIEF-5 scores showed no significant difference between both groups during the study period.
Conclusion: Implementing the ejaculation preservation technique during HoLEP appears to improve early postoperative continence and preserve ejaculation.
期刊介绍:
The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.