了解数字自我监测工具在精神卫生保健中的运用:定性分析。

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.2196/60096
Lena de Thurah, Glenn Kiekens, Jeroen Weermeijer, Lotte Uyttebroek, Martien Wampers, Rafaël Bonnier, Inez Myin-Germeys
{"title":"了解数字自我监测工具在精神卫生保健中的运用:定性分析。","authors":"Lena de Thurah, Glenn Kiekens, Jeroen Weermeijer, Lotte Uyttebroek, Martien Wampers, Rafaël Bonnier, Inez Myin-Germeys","doi":"10.2196/60096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital self-monitoring tools, such as the experience sampling method (ESM), enable individuals to collect detailed information about their mental health and daily life context and may help guide and support person-centered mental health care. However, similar to many digital interventions, the ESM struggles to move from research to clinical integration. To guide the implementation of self-monitoring tools in mental health care, it is important to understand why and how clinicians and clients adopted, adapted, and incorporated these tools in practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Therefore, this study examined how clinicians and clients within a psychiatric center appropriated an ESM-based self-monitoring tool within their therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve clinicians and 24 clients participated in the piloting of the ESM tool, IMPROVE. After utilizing the tool, 7 clinicians and 11 clients took part in semistructured interviews. A thematic framework analysis was performed focusing on participants' prior knowledge and expectations, actual use in practice, and potential future use of ESM tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Many participants experienced that the ESM tool provided useful information about clients' mental health, especially when clinicians and clients engaged in collaborative data interpretation. However, clinicians experienced several mismatches between system usability and their technical competencies, and many clients found it difficult to comply with the self-assessments. Importantly, most participants wanted to use digital self-monitoring tools in the future.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians' and clients' choice to adopt and integrate self-monitoring tools in their practice seems to depend upon the perceived balance between the added benefits and the effort required to achieve them. Enhancing user support or redesigning ESM tools to reduce workload and data burden could help overcome implementation barriers. Future research should involve end users in the development of ESM self-monitoring tools for mental health care and further investigate the perspectives of nonadopters.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"12 ","pages":"e60096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Appropriation of Digital Self-Monitoring Tools in Mental Health Care: Qualitative Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lena de Thurah, Glenn Kiekens, Jeroen Weermeijer, Lotte Uyttebroek, Martien Wampers, Rafaël Bonnier, Inez Myin-Germeys\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/60096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital self-monitoring tools, such as the experience sampling method (ESM), enable individuals to collect detailed information about their mental health and daily life context and may help guide and support person-centered mental health care. However, similar to many digital interventions, the ESM struggles to move from research to clinical integration. To guide the implementation of self-monitoring tools in mental health care, it is important to understand why and how clinicians and clients adopted, adapted, and incorporated these tools in practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Therefore, this study examined how clinicians and clients within a psychiatric center appropriated an ESM-based self-monitoring tool within their therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve clinicians and 24 clients participated in the piloting of the ESM tool, IMPROVE. After utilizing the tool, 7 clinicians and 11 clients took part in semistructured interviews. A thematic framework analysis was performed focusing on participants' prior knowledge and expectations, actual use in practice, and potential future use of ESM tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Many participants experienced that the ESM tool provided useful information about clients' mental health, especially when clinicians and clients engaged in collaborative data interpretation. However, clinicians experienced several mismatches between system usability and their technical competencies, and many clients found it difficult to comply with the self-assessments. Importantly, most participants wanted to use digital self-monitoring tools in the future.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians' and clients' choice to adopt and integrate self-monitoring tools in their practice seems to depend upon the perceived balance between the added benefits and the effort required to achieve them. Enhancing user support or redesigning ESM tools to reduce workload and data burden could help overcome implementation barriers. Future research should involve end users in the development of ESM self-monitoring tools for mental health care and further investigate the perspectives of nonadopters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Human Factors\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"e60096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892539/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/60096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/60096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数字自我监测工具,如经验抽样法(ESM),使个人能够收集有关其心理健康和日常生活背景的详细信息,并有助于指导和支持以人为本的心理卫生保健。然而,与许多数字干预措施类似,ESM努力从研究转向临床整合。为了指导精神卫生保健中自我监测工具的实施,重要的是要了解临床医生和客户为什么以及如何在实践中采用、适应和整合这些工具。目的:因此,本研究调查了精神病中心的临床医生和客户如何在他们的治疗中使用基于esm的自我监测工具。方法:12名临床医生和24名客户参与了ESM工具改进的试点。使用该工具后,7名临床医生和11名客户参加了半结构化访谈。主题框架分析侧重于参与者的先验知识和期望、实践中的实际使用情况以及ESM工具的潜在未来使用情况。结果:许多参与者体验到,ESM工具提供了关于客户心理健康的有用信息,特别是当临床医生和客户进行协作数据解释时。然而,临床医生在系统可用性和他们的技术能力之间经历了一些不匹配,许多客户发现很难遵守自我评估。重要的是,大多数参与者希望在未来使用数字自我监测工具。结论:临床医生和客户在实践中采用和整合自我监测工具的选择似乎取决于额外收益和实现这些收益所需努力之间的感知平衡。增强用户支持或重新设计ESM工具以减少工作负载和数据负担有助于克服实现障碍。未来的研究应该让最终用户参与到ESM自我监测工具的开发中,并进一步调查非采用者的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Appropriation of Digital Self-Monitoring Tools in Mental Health Care: Qualitative Analysis.

Background: Digital self-monitoring tools, such as the experience sampling method (ESM), enable individuals to collect detailed information about their mental health and daily life context and may help guide and support person-centered mental health care. However, similar to many digital interventions, the ESM struggles to move from research to clinical integration. To guide the implementation of self-monitoring tools in mental health care, it is important to understand why and how clinicians and clients adopted, adapted, and incorporated these tools in practice.

Objective: Therefore, this study examined how clinicians and clients within a psychiatric center appropriated an ESM-based self-monitoring tool within their therapy.

Methods: Twelve clinicians and 24 clients participated in the piloting of the ESM tool, IMPROVE. After utilizing the tool, 7 clinicians and 11 clients took part in semistructured interviews. A thematic framework analysis was performed focusing on participants' prior knowledge and expectations, actual use in practice, and potential future use of ESM tools.

Results: Many participants experienced that the ESM tool provided useful information about clients' mental health, especially when clinicians and clients engaged in collaborative data interpretation. However, clinicians experienced several mismatches between system usability and their technical competencies, and many clients found it difficult to comply with the self-assessments. Importantly, most participants wanted to use digital self-monitoring tools in the future.

Conclusions: Clinicians' and clients' choice to adopt and integrate self-monitoring tools in their practice seems to depend upon the perceived balance between the added benefits and the effort required to achieve them. Enhancing user support or redesigning ESM tools to reduce workload and data burden could help overcome implementation barriers. Future research should involve end users in the development of ESM self-monitoring tools for mental health care and further investigate the perspectives of nonadopters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信