弥合数字鸿沟:技术在药学教育中的重要性。

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Radhika Devraj , Jordan R. Covvey , Sally A. Arif
{"title":"弥合数字鸿沟:技术在药学教育中的重要性。","authors":"Radhika Devraj ,&nbsp;Jordan R. Covvey ,&nbsp;Sally A. Arif","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technology is ubiquitous in both pharmacy education and practice, vital for optimizing the learning environment and delivering high-quality patient care. The growth of artificial intelligence, automation, and wearable technologies has prompted changes in pharmacy curricula, with the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education now requiring education on digital health and associated technologies. Although technology offers significant benefits, it can also perpetuate inequities that disproportionately affect marginalized populations. These disparities arise from differences in technology access, varying levels of digital literacy, and biases embedded within technological tools. With the anticipated continuing expansion of technology use, creating equitable learning environments and preventing unintentional biases in patient care are paramount goals. Therefore, this commentary aims to introduce the concept of techquity and urge pharmacy educators to discuss not only digital health but also the sources of technology-driven inequities. Further, we encourage faculty to remain mindful of these inequities within the learning environment and explore ways to promote techquity in education. Educating future pharmacists about techquity will ensure a future where technology-based inequities are significantly minimized or eliminated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 4","pages":"Article 101380"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the Digital Divide: The Importance of Techquity in Pharmacy Education\",\"authors\":\"Radhika Devraj ,&nbsp;Jordan R. Covvey ,&nbsp;Sally A. Arif\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Technology is ubiquitous in both pharmacy education and practice, vital for optimizing the learning environment and delivering high-quality patient care. The growth of artificial intelligence, automation, and wearable technologies has prompted changes in pharmacy curricula, with the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education now requiring education on digital health and associated technologies. Although technology offers significant benefits, it can also perpetuate inequities that disproportionately affect marginalized populations. These disparities arise from differences in technology access, varying levels of digital literacy, and biases embedded within technological tools. With the anticipated continuing expansion of technology use, creating equitable learning environments and preventing unintentional biases in patient care are paramount goals. Therefore, this commentary aims to introduce the concept of techquity and urge pharmacy educators to discuss not only digital health but also the sources of technology-driven inequities. Further, we encourage faculty to remain mindful of these inequities within the learning environment and explore ways to promote techquity in education. Educating future pharmacists about techquity will ensure a future where technology-based inequities are significantly minimized or eliminated.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"89 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000257\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术在药学教育和实践中无处不在,对于学习环境的最佳运作以及提供高质量的患者护理至关重要。人工智能、自动化和可穿戴技术的发展促使药学课程发生了变化,药学教育认证委员会(ACPE)现在要求有关数字健康和相关技术的教育。虽然技术带来了重要的好处,但它也可能产生不平等现象,对边缘人群产生不成比例的影响。这些问题是由多种因素引起的,包括技术获取的差异、不同的数字素养以及工具中嵌入的偏见。随着技术使用的预期持续增长,创造公平的学习环境和防止无意的偏见嵌入患者护理中是至关重要的。因此,这篇评论的目标是介绍技术公平的概念,并呼吁药学教育工作者不仅要讨论数字健康,还要讨论技术驱动的不公平的来源。此外,我们还旨在提醒教师认识到学习环境中的这些不公平现象,并研究促进教育中的技术公平的方法。对未来的药剂师进行技术公平教育,将确保未来以技术为基础的不公平现象显著减少或消除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging the Digital Divide: The Importance of Techquity in Pharmacy Education
Technology is ubiquitous in both pharmacy education and practice, vital for optimizing the learning environment and delivering high-quality patient care. The growth of artificial intelligence, automation, and wearable technologies has prompted changes in pharmacy curricula, with the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education now requiring education on digital health and associated technologies. Although technology offers significant benefits, it can also perpetuate inequities that disproportionately affect marginalized populations. These disparities arise from differences in technology access, varying levels of digital literacy, and biases embedded within technological tools. With the anticipated continuing expansion of technology use, creating equitable learning environments and preventing unintentional biases in patient care are paramount goals. Therefore, this commentary aims to introduce the concept of techquity and urge pharmacy educators to discuss not only digital health but also the sources of technology-driven inequities. Further, we encourage faculty to remain mindful of these inequities within the learning environment and explore ways to promote techquity in education. Educating future pharmacists about techquity will ensure a future where technology-based inequities are significantly minimized or eliminated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信