最简单的解决方案可能是好的,但它足够好吗?评估在创伤性损伤血制品复苏期间轻推给予钙的效果。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1111/trf.18180
Daniela Schmulevich, Sarah M Joergensen, Alea I Zone, Kathleen E Bishop, Andrea P Morlok, Theresa A Colyar, Alyson D Hinkle, Rinad S Beidas, M Kit Delgado, Jeremy W Cannon
{"title":"最简单的解决方案可能是好的,但它足够好吗?评估在创伤性损伤血制品复苏期间轻推给予钙的效果。","authors":"Daniela Schmulevich, Sarah M Joergensen, Alea I Zone, Kathleen E Bishop, Andrea P Morlok, Theresa A Colyar, Alyson D Hinkle, Rinad S Beidas, M Kit Delgado, Jeremy W Cannon","doi":"10.1111/trf.18180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypocalcemia following severe injury is common. Current institution-specific guidelines recommend calcium (Ca<sup>++</sup>) supplementation during blood product resuscitation. We hypothesize that a nudge intervention would improve clinician adherence to Ca<sup>++</sup>-specific guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study at an urban Level I trauma center evaluated compliance with Ca<sup>++</sup>-specific guidelines during trauma resuscitations. A baseline assessment of guideline awareness preceded four-month pre-intervention and four-month post-intervention periods from July 2021 to February 2022. Nudge signs prompting clinicians to administer Ca<sup>++</sup> were placed throughout all phases of care. Administration of ≥1 dose of Ca<sup>++</sup> after four blood products was the primary endpoint. Aggregate ionized calcium (iCa<sup>++</sup>) levels and percent time within a normal iCa<sup>++</sup> range were secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline assessment of n = 41 trauma team members indicated 83% were uncertain or unaware of current Ca<sup>++</sup> recommendations. Of 86 screened patients, 25 met inclusion criteria. These were median ([IQR] 34 [25-43]) years old with an Injury Severity Score of 18 [14-26] and 84% penetrating injuries with n = 11 pre-intervention and n = 14 post-intervention. The absolute difference (95% CI) in Ca<sup>++</sup> guideline adherence post-intervention compared to pre-intervention was 6.5% (-11.9% to 24.9%, p = 0.755). In aggregate, iCa<sup>++</sup> levels were no different between groups, although the distribution of levels post-intervention trended toward the normal range with less extreme hypocalcemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Signs prompting clinicians to give Ca<sup>++</sup> were associated with a modest, non-statistically significant increase in adherence to institution-specific guidelines and a slight shift in the distribution of iCa<sup>++</sup> values toward normal. Future work to optimize resuscitation should evaluate larger cohorts of acutely injured patients and more potent nudges.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"S113-S122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The simplest solution may be good, but is it good enough? Evaluating the effect of a nudge to administer calcium during blood product resuscitation for traumatic injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Schmulevich, Sarah M Joergensen, Alea I Zone, Kathleen E Bishop, Andrea P Morlok, Theresa A Colyar, Alyson D Hinkle, Rinad S Beidas, M Kit Delgado, Jeremy W Cannon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.18180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypocalcemia following severe injury is common. Current institution-specific guidelines recommend calcium (Ca<sup>++</sup>) supplementation during blood product resuscitation. We hypothesize that a nudge intervention would improve clinician adherence to Ca<sup>++</sup>-specific guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study at an urban Level I trauma center evaluated compliance with Ca<sup>++</sup>-specific guidelines during trauma resuscitations. A baseline assessment of guideline awareness preceded four-month pre-intervention and four-month post-intervention periods from July 2021 to February 2022. Nudge signs prompting clinicians to administer Ca<sup>++</sup> were placed throughout all phases of care. Administration of ≥1 dose of Ca<sup>++</sup> after four blood products was the primary endpoint. Aggregate ionized calcium (iCa<sup>++</sup>) levels and percent time within a normal iCa<sup>++</sup> range were secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline assessment of n = 41 trauma team members indicated 83% were uncertain or unaware of current Ca<sup>++</sup> recommendations. Of 86 screened patients, 25 met inclusion criteria. These were median ([IQR] 34 [25-43]) years old with an Injury Severity Score of 18 [14-26] and 84% penetrating injuries with n = 11 pre-intervention and n = 14 post-intervention. The absolute difference (95% CI) in Ca<sup>++</sup> guideline adherence post-intervention compared to pre-intervention was 6.5% (-11.9% to 24.9%, p = 0.755). In aggregate, iCa<sup>++</sup> levels were no different between groups, although the distribution of levels post-intervention trended toward the normal range with less extreme hypocalcemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Signs prompting clinicians to give Ca<sup>++</sup> were associated with a modest, non-statistically significant increase in adherence to institution-specific guidelines and a slight shift in the distribution of iCa<sup>++</sup> values toward normal. Future work to optimize resuscitation should evaluate larger cohorts of acutely injured patients and more potent nudges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"S113-S122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035992/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18180\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重损伤后低钙血症很常见。目前的机构特定指南建议在血液制品复苏期间补充钙(Ca++)。我们假设轻推干预将提高临床医生对钙特异性指南的依从性。方法:本研究在城市一级创伤中心进行,评估创伤复苏期间对Ca++特异性指南的依从性。在2021年7月至2022年2月为期4个月的干预前和干预后4个月期间,对指南意识进行了基线评估。提示临床医生在护理的所有阶段使用钙离子的轻推标志。四种血液制品后给予≥1剂量的Ca++是主要终点。聚集离子钙(ic++)水平和在正常ic++范围内的时间百分比是次要结果。结果:对n = 41名创伤小组成员的基线评估表明,83%的人不确定或不知道当前的ca++建议。86例筛查患者中,25例符合纳入标准。这些患者的中位年龄([IQR] 34[25-43]),损伤严重评分为18[14-26],84%为穿透性损伤,干预前n = 11,干预后n = 14。干预后与干预前相比,Ca++指南依从性的绝对差异(95% CI)为6.5%(-11.9%至24.9%,p = 0.755)。总的来说,各组之间的ic++水平没有差异,尽管干预后的水平分布趋向于正常范围,低钙血症较少。结论:提示临床医生给予Ca++的迹象与对机构特定指南的依从性的适度,非统计显著性增加以及Ca++值分布向正常方向的轻微转变有关。未来优化复苏的工作应该评估更大的急性损伤患者队列和更有效的轻推。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The simplest solution may be good, but is it good enough? Evaluating the effect of a nudge to administer calcium during blood product resuscitation for traumatic injuries.

Background: Hypocalcemia following severe injury is common. Current institution-specific guidelines recommend calcium (Ca++) supplementation during blood product resuscitation. We hypothesize that a nudge intervention would improve clinician adherence to Ca++-specific guidelines.

Methods: This study at an urban Level I trauma center evaluated compliance with Ca++-specific guidelines during trauma resuscitations. A baseline assessment of guideline awareness preceded four-month pre-intervention and four-month post-intervention periods from July 2021 to February 2022. Nudge signs prompting clinicians to administer Ca++ were placed throughout all phases of care. Administration of ≥1 dose of Ca++ after four blood products was the primary endpoint. Aggregate ionized calcium (iCa++) levels and percent time within a normal iCa++ range were secondary outcomes.

Results: Baseline assessment of n = 41 trauma team members indicated 83% were uncertain or unaware of current Ca++ recommendations. Of 86 screened patients, 25 met inclusion criteria. These were median ([IQR] 34 [25-43]) years old with an Injury Severity Score of 18 [14-26] and 84% penetrating injuries with n = 11 pre-intervention and n = 14 post-intervention. The absolute difference (95% CI) in Ca++ guideline adherence post-intervention compared to pre-intervention was 6.5% (-11.9% to 24.9%, p = 0.755). In aggregate, iCa++ levels were no different between groups, although the distribution of levels post-intervention trended toward the normal range with less extreme hypocalcemia.

Conclusions: Signs prompting clinicians to give Ca++ were associated with a modest, non-statistically significant increase in adherence to institution-specific guidelines and a slight shift in the distribution of iCa++ values toward normal. Future work to optimize resuscitation should evaluate larger cohorts of acutely injured patients and more potent nudges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信