骨髓浓缩液、富血小板血浆和透明质酸注射治疗膝骨关节炎患者的生活质量改变

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q4 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Regenerative medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1080/17460751.2025.2472589
Oliver Dulic, Dzihan Abazovic, Sara Matijevic, Predrag Rasovic, Mirko Obradovic, Mile Bjelobrk, Milan Tosic, Ivica Lalic, Branko Baljak, Milan Milinkov
{"title":"骨髓浓缩液、富血小板血浆和透明质酸注射治疗膝骨关节炎患者的生活质量改变","authors":"Oliver Dulic, Dzihan Abazovic, Sara Matijevic, Predrag Rasovic, Mirko Obradovic, Mile Bjelobrk, Milan Tosic, Ivica Lalic, Branko Baljak, Milan Milinkov","doi":"10.1080/17460751.2025.2472589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of different treatments on quality of life in knee osteoarthritis patients. It focused on three therapies: bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and hyaluronic acid (HA).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The trial was conducted at a single center with 175 patients over a 12-month period with the knee OA, KL grade II-IV. Outcomes were measured using the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) and SF-36 scales, which assess physical and emotional well-being. Linear mixed models (LMMs) were used to analyze which treatment had the most positive impact on quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with BMAC showed the most substantial improvement, particularly in physical health and mobility (<i>p</i> ≤ 0,001). PRP outperformed HA in some aspects, but BMAC consistently led to greater gains. The most notable enhancements were seen in areas like role limitations due to physical health and overall physical functioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study suggested that BMAC treatment may contribute to improved quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis, particularly in terms of physical function. The correlation between WOMAC and SF-36 scores supports these findings, indicating a potential role for BMAC in enhancing mobility.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT03825133 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":21043,"journal":{"name":"Regenerative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life changes in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis treated with bone marrow aspirate concentrate, platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid injections.\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Dulic, Dzihan Abazovic, Sara Matijevic, Predrag Rasovic, Mirko Obradovic, Mile Bjelobrk, Milan Tosic, Ivica Lalic, Branko Baljak, Milan Milinkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17460751.2025.2472589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of different treatments on quality of life in knee osteoarthritis patients. It focused on three therapies: bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and hyaluronic acid (HA).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The trial was conducted at a single center with 175 patients over a 12-month period with the knee OA, KL grade II-IV. Outcomes were measured using the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) and SF-36 scales, which assess physical and emotional well-being. Linear mixed models (LMMs) were used to analyze which treatment had the most positive impact on quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with BMAC showed the most substantial improvement, particularly in physical health and mobility (<i>p</i> ≤ 0,001). PRP outperformed HA in some aspects, but BMAC consistently led to greater gains. The most notable enhancements were seen in areas like role limitations due to physical health and overall physical functioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study suggested that BMAC treatment may contribute to improved quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis, particularly in terms of physical function. The correlation between WOMAC and SF-36 scores supports these findings, indicating a potential role for BMAC in enhancing mobility.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT03825133 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regenerative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"87-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regenerative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460751.2025.2472589\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regenerative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460751.2025.2472589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在比较不同治疗方法对膝关节骨关节炎患者生活质量的影响。它专注于三种疗法:骨髓浓缩液(BMAC)、富血小板血浆(PRP)和透明质酸(HA)。方法:该试验在单中心进行,175例膝关节OA患者,KL分级为II-IV级,为期12个月。使用WOMAC(西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数)和SF-36量表测量结果,评估身体和情绪健康。使用线性混合模型(lmm)分析哪种治疗对生活质量有最积极的影响。结果:BMAC治疗的患者表现出最显著的改善,特别是在身体健康和活动能力方面(p≤0.001)。PRP在某些方面优于HA,但BMAC始终带来更大的收益。最显著的改善是在身体健康和整体身体功能方面的角色限制。结论:研究表明BMAC治疗可能有助于改善膝骨关节炎患者的生活质量,特别是在身体功能方面。WOMAC和SF-36评分之间的相关性支持了这些发现,表明BMAC在增强移动性方面的潜在作用。临床试验注册:NCT03825133 (ClinicalTrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of life changes in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis treated with bone marrow aspirate concentrate, platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid injections.

Background: This study aimed to compare the effects of different treatments on quality of life in knee osteoarthritis patients. It focused on three therapies: bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and hyaluronic acid (HA).

Methodology: The trial was conducted at a single center with 175 patients over a 12-month period with the knee OA, KL grade II-IV. Outcomes were measured using the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) and SF-36 scales, which assess physical and emotional well-being. Linear mixed models (LMMs) were used to analyze which treatment had the most positive impact on quality of life.

Results: Patients treated with BMAC showed the most substantial improvement, particularly in physical health and mobility (p ≤ 0,001). PRP outperformed HA in some aspects, but BMAC consistently led to greater gains. The most notable enhancements were seen in areas like role limitations due to physical health and overall physical functioning.

Conclusions: The study suggested that BMAC treatment may contribute to improved quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis, particularly in terms of physical function. The correlation between WOMAC and SF-36 scores supports these findings, indicating a potential role for BMAC in enhancing mobility.

Clinical trial registration: NCT03825133 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Regenerative medicine
Regenerative medicine 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regenerative medicine replaces or regenerates human cells, tissue or organs, to restore or establish normal function*. Since 2006, Regenerative Medicine has been at the forefront of publishing the very best papers and reviews covering the entire regenerative medicine sector. The journal focusses on the entire spectrum of approaches to regenerative medicine, including small molecule drugs, biologics, biomaterials and tissue engineering, and cell and gene therapies – it’s all about regeneration and not a specific platform technology. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of the sector ranging from discovery research, through to clinical development, through to commercialization. Regenerative Medicine uniquely supports this important area of biomedical science and healthcare by providing a peer-reviewed journal totally committed to publishing the very best regenerative medicine research, clinical translation and commercialization. Regenerative Medicine provides a specialist forum to address the important challenges and advances in regenerative medicine, delivering this essential information in concise, clear and attractive article formats – vital to a rapidly growing, multidisciplinary and increasingly time-constrained community. Despite substantial developments in our knowledge and understanding of regeneration, the field is still in its infancy. However, progress is accelerating. The next few decades will see the discovery and development of transformative therapies for patients, and in some cases, even cures. Regenerative Medicine will continue to provide a critical overview of these advances as they progress, undergo clinical trials, and eventually become mainstream medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信