对不确定性的不灵活反应:心理不灵活性在不确定性不容忍、创伤性压力和躯体症状之间的联系中的中介作用。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Chung Xiann Lim, Emily A Mueller, L Brooke Short, Rong Xia, Piraorn Suvanbenjakule, William H O'Brien
{"title":"对不确定性的不灵活反应:心理不灵活性在不确定性不容忍、创伤性压力和躯体症状之间的联系中的中介作用。","authors":"Chung Xiann Lim, Emily A Mueller, L Brooke Short, Rong Xia, Piraorn Suvanbenjakule, William H O'Brien","doi":"10.1037/tra0001860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and psychological inflexibility (PI) were shown to be risk factors of traumatic stress (TS) and somatic symptoms (SS) during COVID-19. The present study tested a structural equation model where PI mediated the relationships between IU, TS, and SS based on their theoretical and experimental overlaps. The contribution of all six PI facets including experiential avoidance (EA) and cognitive fusion (CF) were investigated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample was made up of 656 participants who reported elevated scores for TS and SS. Mediation analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to test the proposed model. A sensitivity analysis followed the mediation analysis. Follow-up hierarchical regressions were conducted to examine the individual contribution of each PI facet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall model demonstrated a good fit (comparative fit index = .98; root-mean-square error of approximation = .07; total effects on TS and SS: β = .78, β = .60). IU was positively associated with TS and SS, and the relations were mediated by PI, with PI accounting for most of the effect. Hierarchical analyses revealed the less studied PI facets explained additional variance over and beyond EA and CF. EA and CF were no longer significant predictors of TS and SS after all PI facets were entered while controlling for IU and demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings were consistent with previous researchers positing PI as an overarching construct encompassing IU and other related psychological vulnerabilities. PI facets beyond EA and CF warrant more investigations. Clinically, PI and PI facets could be important intervention targets for high IU individuals in times of uncertainty. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inflexible responses to uncertainty: The mediating role of psychological inflexibility in the link between intolerance of uncertainty, traumatic stress, and somatic symptoms.\",\"authors\":\"Chung Xiann Lim, Emily A Mueller, L Brooke Short, Rong Xia, Piraorn Suvanbenjakule, William H O'Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and psychological inflexibility (PI) were shown to be risk factors of traumatic stress (TS) and somatic symptoms (SS) during COVID-19. The present study tested a structural equation model where PI mediated the relationships between IU, TS, and SS based on their theoretical and experimental overlaps. The contribution of all six PI facets including experiential avoidance (EA) and cognitive fusion (CF) were investigated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample was made up of 656 participants who reported elevated scores for TS and SS. Mediation analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to test the proposed model. A sensitivity analysis followed the mediation analysis. Follow-up hierarchical regressions were conducted to examine the individual contribution of each PI facet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall model demonstrated a good fit (comparative fit index = .98; root-mean-square error of approximation = .07; total effects on TS and SS: β = .78, β = .60). IU was positively associated with TS and SS, and the relations were mediated by PI, with PI accounting for most of the effect. Hierarchical analyses revealed the less studied PI facets explained additional variance over and beyond EA and CF. EA and CF were no longer significant predictors of TS and SS after all PI facets were entered while controlling for IU and demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings were consistent with previous researchers positing PI as an overarching construct encompassing IU and other related psychological vulnerabilities. PI facets beyond EA and CF warrant more investigations. Clinically, PI and PI facets could be important intervention targets for high IU individuals in times of uncertainty. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001860\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001860","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inflexible responses to uncertainty: The mediating role of psychological inflexibility in the link between intolerance of uncertainty, traumatic stress, and somatic symptoms.

Objective: Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and psychological inflexibility (PI) were shown to be risk factors of traumatic stress (TS) and somatic symptoms (SS) during COVID-19. The present study tested a structural equation model where PI mediated the relationships between IU, TS, and SS based on their theoretical and experimental overlaps. The contribution of all six PI facets including experiential avoidance (EA) and cognitive fusion (CF) were investigated.

Method: The sample was made up of 656 participants who reported elevated scores for TS and SS. Mediation analysis was conducted via structural equation modeling to test the proposed model. A sensitivity analysis followed the mediation analysis. Follow-up hierarchical regressions were conducted to examine the individual contribution of each PI facet.

Results: The overall model demonstrated a good fit (comparative fit index = .98; root-mean-square error of approximation = .07; total effects on TS and SS: β = .78, β = .60). IU was positively associated with TS and SS, and the relations were mediated by PI, with PI accounting for most of the effect. Hierarchical analyses revealed the less studied PI facets explained additional variance over and beyond EA and CF. EA and CF were no longer significant predictors of TS and SS after all PI facets were entered while controlling for IU and demographic variables.

Conclusions: The findings were consistent with previous researchers positing PI as an overarching construct encompassing IU and other related psychological vulnerabilities. PI facets beyond EA and CF warrant more investigations. Clinically, PI and PI facets could be important intervention targets for high IU individuals in times of uncertainty. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信