评估药学教育中以人为本的关怀。

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Andrew Darley , Michelle Z. Farland , Lauren E. Adkins , Mary E. Ray
{"title":"评估药学教育中以人为本的关怀。","authors":"Andrew Darley ,&nbsp;Michelle Z. Farland ,&nbsp;Lauren E. Adkins ,&nbsp;Mary E. Ray","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The ability to provide person-centered care is an important aspect of the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process (PPCP); therefore, the assessment of students’ skills in this area is essential in pharmacy curricula. The objectives of this article were to: (1) review literature on the assessment of student pharmacists’ ability to provide person-centered care, (2) describe trends in assessment practices relevant to this skill, and (3) provide recommendations for pharmacy educators on the assessment of this skill and further research.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A total of 62 sources were included in the analysis for this review. Results were characterized by the educational setting in which the assessment took place (ie, didactic, skills, and/or experiential), assessment strategies (eg, self-evaluations, simulations, knowledge-based quizzes, reflections, objective structured clinical exams), and themes observed for commonly assessed skill areas (eg, empathy, communication, interprofessional teamwork, and social determinants of health). Gaps in the assessment of person-centered care, particularly regarding specific steps of the PPCP (follow-up and documentation) were identified in the sources reviewed.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>Assessment practices of students’ ability to provide person-centered care within the context of the PPCP were reviewed, and key findings relevant to pharmacy education were described. More holistic person-centered care assessment strategies that encompass the full PPCP are recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 4","pages":"Article 101383"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Person-Centered Care in Pharmacy Education\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Darley ,&nbsp;Michelle Z. Farland ,&nbsp;Lauren E. Adkins ,&nbsp;Mary E. Ray\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The ability to provide person-centered care is an important aspect of the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process (PPCP); therefore, the assessment of students’ skills in this area is essential in pharmacy curricula. The objectives of this article were to: (1) review literature on the assessment of student pharmacists’ ability to provide person-centered care, (2) describe trends in assessment practices relevant to this skill, and (3) provide recommendations for pharmacy educators on the assessment of this skill and further research.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A total of 62 sources were included in the analysis for this review. Results were characterized by the educational setting in which the assessment took place (ie, didactic, skills, and/or experiential), assessment strategies (eg, self-evaluations, simulations, knowledge-based quizzes, reflections, objective structured clinical exams), and themes observed for commonly assessed skill areas (eg, empathy, communication, interprofessional teamwork, and social determinants of health). Gaps in the assessment of person-centered care, particularly regarding specific steps of the PPCP (follow-up and documentation) were identified in the sources reviewed.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>Assessment practices of students’ ability to provide person-centered care within the context of the PPCP were reviewed, and key findings relevant to pharmacy education were described. More holistic person-centered care assessment strategies that encompass the full PPCP are recommended.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"89 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000282\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:提供以人为本的护理的能力是药师患者护理过程(PPCP)的一个重要方面;因此,评估学生在这方面的技能在药学课程中是必不可少的。本文的目的是:1)回顾有关药学学生提供以人为本的护理能力评估的文献;2)描述与该技能相关的评估实践趋势;3)为药学教育工作者提供有关该技能评估和进一步研究的建议。结果:本综述分析了62个来源。结果的特征包括评估发生的教育环境(即教学,技能和/或经验),评估策略(例如,自我评估,模拟,基于知识的测验,反思,客观结构化临床考试),以及通常评估的技能领域观察到的主题(例如,移情,沟通,跨专业团队合作和健康的社会决定因素)。在评估与PPCP具体步骤相关的以人为本的护理方面存在差距(随访和记录)。摘要:回顾了在PPCP背景下学生提供以人为本的护理能力的评估实践,并描述了与药学教育相关的主要发现。建议采用更全面的以人为中心的护理评估策略,包括完整的PPCP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Person-Centered Care in Pharmacy Education

Objectives

The ability to provide person-centered care is an important aspect of the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process (PPCP); therefore, the assessment of students’ skills in this area is essential in pharmacy curricula. The objectives of this article were to: (1) review literature on the assessment of student pharmacists’ ability to provide person-centered care, (2) describe trends in assessment practices relevant to this skill, and (3) provide recommendations for pharmacy educators on the assessment of this skill and further research.

Findings

A total of 62 sources were included in the analysis for this review. Results were characterized by the educational setting in which the assessment took place (ie, didactic, skills, and/or experiential), assessment strategies (eg, self-evaluations, simulations, knowledge-based quizzes, reflections, objective structured clinical exams), and themes observed for commonly assessed skill areas (eg, empathy, communication, interprofessional teamwork, and social determinants of health). Gaps in the assessment of person-centered care, particularly regarding specific steps of the PPCP (follow-up and documentation) were identified in the sources reviewed.

Summary

Assessment practices of students’ ability to provide person-centered care within the context of the PPCP were reviewed, and key findings relevant to pharmacy education were described. More holistic person-centered care assessment strategies that encompass the full PPCP are recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信