护理质量和利益相关者对新加坡PEC实施的看法:一项混合方法研究协议。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Wanfen Yip, Michelle Jessica Pereira, Joseph Antonio De Castro Molina, Woan Shin Tan, Kiok Liang Teow, Vivien Yip Cherng Hui, Vernon Yong Khet Yau, Hon Tym Wong, Tock Han Lim, Bee Hoon Heng
{"title":"护理质量和利益相关者对新加坡PEC实施的看法:一项混合方法研究协议。","authors":"Wanfen Yip, Michelle Jessica Pereira, Joseph Antonio De Castro Molina, Woan Shin Tan, Kiok Liang Teow, Vivien Yip Cherng Hui, Vernon Yong Khet Yau, Hon Tym Wong, Tock Han Lim, Bee Hoon Heng","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2473714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Primary eye care (PEC) model aims to facilitate right-siting of care for patients with stable and non-complex conditions by upskilling optometrists. However, there is 1) a lack of examination on PEC's quality of care (measured as degree of agreement in plan of care between upskilled optometrists and ophthalmologists) and 2) no comprehensive real-world evaluation on operational viability and stakeholders' perception of the community-based PEC model. Holistic evaluation is important as in-depth understanding of stakeholders' experience in implementation will be key to ensure the long-term sustainability and scalability of this PEC model. This study aims to examine the quality of care provided at PEC as well as the contextual factors, strategies, and processes that influence implementation, sustainability, and scalability of PEC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study will adopt a mixed-method sequential explanatory design, guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model framework. First, the quality of care will be assessed by examining the degree of agreement between PEC optometrists and ophthalmologists on patients' plan of care. Second, qualitative research design will be employed to understand the experiences of patients and healthcare professionals. In-depth interviews will be conducted with patients and focused group discussions will be conducted with healthcare professionals. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data will be achieved by employing the building and merging approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study will identify areas that could be improved to increase PEC's operational efficiency and enhance its service utilisation. Importantly, key lessons and strategies derived from these evaluations will help to facilitate future nationwide implementation of PEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Care and Stakeholders' Perceptions of PEC Implementation in Singapore: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Wanfen Yip, Michelle Jessica Pereira, Joseph Antonio De Castro Molina, Woan Shin Tan, Kiok Liang Teow, Vivien Yip Cherng Hui, Vernon Yong Khet Yau, Hon Tym Wong, Tock Han Lim, Bee Hoon Heng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09286586.2025.2473714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Primary eye care (PEC) model aims to facilitate right-siting of care for patients with stable and non-complex conditions by upskilling optometrists. However, there is 1) a lack of examination on PEC's quality of care (measured as degree of agreement in plan of care between upskilled optometrists and ophthalmologists) and 2) no comprehensive real-world evaluation on operational viability and stakeholders' perception of the community-based PEC model. Holistic evaluation is important as in-depth understanding of stakeholders' experience in implementation will be key to ensure the long-term sustainability and scalability of this PEC model. This study aims to examine the quality of care provided at PEC as well as the contextual factors, strategies, and processes that influence implementation, sustainability, and scalability of PEC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study will adopt a mixed-method sequential explanatory design, guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model framework. First, the quality of care will be assessed by examining the degree of agreement between PEC optometrists and ophthalmologists on patients' plan of care. Second, qualitative research design will be employed to understand the experiences of patients and healthcare professionals. In-depth interviews will be conducted with patients and focused group discussions will be conducted with healthcare professionals. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data will be achieved by employing the building and merging approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study will identify areas that could be improved to increase PEC's operational efficiency and enhance its service utilisation. Importantly, key lessons and strategies derived from these evaluations will help to facilitate future nationwide implementation of PEC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2025.2473714\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2025.2473714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:初级眼保健(PEC)模式旨在通过提高验光师的技能,为病情稳定和非复杂的患者提供正确的护理。然而,有1)缺乏对PEC的护理质量的检查(以高技能验光师和眼科医生之间护理计划的一致程度来衡量),2)没有对基于社区的PEC模式的操作可行性和利益相关者的看法进行全面的现实评估。全面评估很重要,因为深入了解利益相关者在实施过程中的经验将是确保该PEC模型长期可持续性和可扩展性的关键。本研究的目的是检视医疗照护的品质,以及影响医疗照护实施、可持续性和可扩展性的相关因素、策略和流程。方法:本研究将采用混合方法序贯解释设计,以实用、稳健实施和可持续性模型框架为指导。首先,护理质量将通过检查PEC验光师和眼科医生对患者护理计划的一致程度来评估。其次,将采用定性研究设计来了解患者和医疗保健专业人员的体验。将与患者进行深入访谈,并与医疗保健专业人员进行重点小组讨论。采用构建和合并的方法,实现定量和定性数据的整合。结论:本研究将找出可改善之处,以提高医疗中心的运作效率及服务利用率。重要的是,从这些评价中得出的关键经验教训和战略将有助于促进今后在全国范围内执行紧急方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Care and Stakeholders' Perceptions of PEC Implementation in Singapore: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol.

Purpose: Primary eye care (PEC) model aims to facilitate right-siting of care for patients with stable and non-complex conditions by upskilling optometrists. However, there is 1) a lack of examination on PEC's quality of care (measured as degree of agreement in plan of care between upskilled optometrists and ophthalmologists) and 2) no comprehensive real-world evaluation on operational viability and stakeholders' perception of the community-based PEC model. Holistic evaluation is important as in-depth understanding of stakeholders' experience in implementation will be key to ensure the long-term sustainability and scalability of this PEC model. This study aims to examine the quality of care provided at PEC as well as the contextual factors, strategies, and processes that influence implementation, sustainability, and scalability of PEC.

Methods: This study will adopt a mixed-method sequential explanatory design, guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model framework. First, the quality of care will be assessed by examining the degree of agreement between PEC optometrists and ophthalmologists on patients' plan of care. Second, qualitative research design will be employed to understand the experiences of patients and healthcare professionals. In-depth interviews will be conducted with patients and focused group discussions will be conducted with healthcare professionals. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data will be achieved by employing the building and merging approach.

Conclusion: This study will identify areas that could be improved to increase PEC's operational efficiency and enhance its service utilisation. Importantly, key lessons and strategies derived from these evaluations will help to facilitate future nationwide implementation of PEC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信