林蛙幼体感染Ranavirus的强度和传播程度。

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Maya R Rayle, Jesse L Brunner, Nicole C Dahrouge, Erin L Keller, Tracy A G Rittenhouse
{"title":"林蛙幼体感染Ranavirus的强度和传播程度。","authors":"Maya R Rayle, Jesse L Brunner, Nicole C Dahrouge, Erin L Keller, Tracy A G Rittenhouse","doi":"10.1007/s00442-025-05682-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ranaviruses are responsible for mass die offs of wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) tadpoles. What happens in between epidemics is less clear, but juvenile (metamorphosed) stages are hypothesized to move Ranaviruses among wetlands and introduce or reintroduce these viruses into wetlands, initiating new outbreaks. A key question is under what circumstances can juvenile L. sylvaticus infect susceptible conspecifics. We examined Ranavirus transmission between juvenile L. sylvaticus in two settings: first, we measured transmission from a Ranavirus-infected frog to a co-housed susceptible frog via cohabitation over a range of exposure periods. Second, we measured indirect transmission to susceptible frogs from a contaminated environment after a range of waiting times (i.e., from when the infected frog was removed to when the susceptible frog was exposed to the environment). We present evidence that juvenile frogs directly transmitted Ranavirus to susceptible frogs in all exposure periods (99.2% infected), with as little as 1 h of co-housing resulting in 95.8% of susceptibles infected. Indirectly, 96.8% of susceptible frogs became infected after as long as 48 h waiting times. Neither exposure period nor wait times influenced the probability of infection, because these probabilities are already high. In our linear regression models, susceptible frog viral load was significantly correlated with exposure period and cohort for the cohabitation experiment, while wait time was significantly correlated with viral load for the sequential habitation experiment. Collectively, our results suggest that Ranavirus transmission readily occurs between recently metamorphosed wood frogs and via terrestrial environmental exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 3","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infection intensity and severity of Ranavirus transmission in juvenile wood frogs.\",\"authors\":\"Maya R Rayle, Jesse L Brunner, Nicole C Dahrouge, Erin L Keller, Tracy A G Rittenhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00442-025-05682-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ranaviruses are responsible for mass die offs of wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) tadpoles. What happens in between epidemics is less clear, but juvenile (metamorphosed) stages are hypothesized to move Ranaviruses among wetlands and introduce or reintroduce these viruses into wetlands, initiating new outbreaks. A key question is under what circumstances can juvenile L. sylvaticus infect susceptible conspecifics. We examined Ranavirus transmission between juvenile L. sylvaticus in two settings: first, we measured transmission from a Ranavirus-infected frog to a co-housed susceptible frog via cohabitation over a range of exposure periods. Second, we measured indirect transmission to susceptible frogs from a contaminated environment after a range of waiting times (i.e., from when the infected frog was removed to when the susceptible frog was exposed to the environment). We present evidence that juvenile frogs directly transmitted Ranavirus to susceptible frogs in all exposure periods (99.2% infected), with as little as 1 h of co-housing resulting in 95.8% of susceptibles infected. Indirectly, 96.8% of susceptible frogs became infected after as long as 48 h waiting times. Neither exposure period nor wait times influenced the probability of infection, because these probabilities are already high. In our linear regression models, susceptible frog viral load was significantly correlated with exposure period and cohort for the cohabitation experiment, while wait time was significantly correlated with viral load for the sequential habitation experiment. Collectively, our results suggest that Ranavirus transmission readily occurs between recently metamorphosed wood frogs and via terrestrial environmental exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oecologia\",\"volume\":\"207 3\",\"pages\":\"46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880146/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oecologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05682-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05682-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ranavirus是造成林蛙(Lithobates sylvaticus)蝌蚪大量死亡的原因。在两次流行病之间发生的情况尚不清楚,但据推测,幼年期(蜕变期)将ranavirus在湿地之间传播,并将这些病毒引入或再引入湿地,引发新的疫情。一个关键的问题是在什么情况下,幼林乳杆菌可以感染易感同种。我们研究了两种情况下幼龄林蛙之间的拉纳病毒传播:首先,我们测量了在一段暴露时间内,一只感染了拉纳病毒的青蛙通过同居传染给另一只易感染的青蛙。其次,我们测量了在一段等待时间(即,从被感染的青蛙被移走到易感青蛙暴露在环境中时)后,受污染环境中易感青蛙的间接传播。我们提供的证据表明,在所有暴露期间,幼年蛙直接将Ranavirus传播给易感蛙(99.2%感染),仅1小时的共居就导致95.8%的易感蛙感染。间接地,96.8%的易感青蛙在长达48小时的等待时间后被感染。暴露时间和等待时间都没有影响感染的概率,因为这些概率已经很高了。在线性回归模型中,在同居实验中,易感蛙的病毒载量与暴露时间和群体显著相关,而在序贯居住实验中,等待时间与病毒载量显著相关。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,拉纳病毒很容易在最近变质的林蛙之间传播,并通过陆地环境暴露传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Infection intensity and severity of Ranavirus transmission in juvenile wood frogs.

Ranaviruses are responsible for mass die offs of wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) tadpoles. What happens in between epidemics is less clear, but juvenile (metamorphosed) stages are hypothesized to move Ranaviruses among wetlands and introduce or reintroduce these viruses into wetlands, initiating new outbreaks. A key question is under what circumstances can juvenile L. sylvaticus infect susceptible conspecifics. We examined Ranavirus transmission between juvenile L. sylvaticus in two settings: first, we measured transmission from a Ranavirus-infected frog to a co-housed susceptible frog via cohabitation over a range of exposure periods. Second, we measured indirect transmission to susceptible frogs from a contaminated environment after a range of waiting times (i.e., from when the infected frog was removed to when the susceptible frog was exposed to the environment). We present evidence that juvenile frogs directly transmitted Ranavirus to susceptible frogs in all exposure periods (99.2% infected), with as little as 1 h of co-housing resulting in 95.8% of susceptibles infected. Indirectly, 96.8% of susceptible frogs became infected after as long as 48 h waiting times. Neither exposure period nor wait times influenced the probability of infection, because these probabilities are already high. In our linear regression models, susceptible frog viral load was significantly correlated with exposure period and cohort for the cohabitation experiment, while wait time was significantly correlated with viral load for the sequential habitation experiment. Collectively, our results suggest that Ranavirus transmission readily occurs between recently metamorphosed wood frogs and via terrestrial environmental exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信