Zhu You, Zihan Sima, Xiaowen Guo, Xuefen Li, Yanrui Feng, Ning Du, Heyu Zhang, Lisha Sun
{"title":"成釉细胞瘤的突变景观:中国患者BRAF和其他关键突变的分析。","authors":"Zhu You, Zihan Sima, Xiaowen Guo, Xuefen Li, Yanrui Feng, Ning Du, Heyu Zhang, Lisha Sun","doi":"10.1111/odi.15286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the prevalence of BRAF, SMO, KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, FGRF2, and CTNNB1 gene mutations in Chinese ameloblastoma (AM) patients and explore their associations with clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>DNA was extracted from 89 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded AM samples (9 unicystic and 80 conventional). PCR and Sanger sequencing were used to detect mutations, followed by statistical analysis to assess correlations between mutations and clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BRAF V600E mutations were significantly prevalent, occurring in 92% (59/64) of mandibular AMs compared to 40% (10/25) in maxillary AMs. SMO mutations were found in 20% (5/25) of maxillary and 3.1% (2/64) of mandibular AMs. FGFR2 mutations were detected in six maxillary and two mandibular AMs, while RAS mutations were present in four maxillary and one mandibular AM. No detectable HRAS, NRAS(G12), or CTNNB1 mutations were observed. BRAF mutations showed mutual exclusivity with SMO and FGFR2 mutations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations, particularly in mandibular AMs, suggests its potential as a diagnostic and therapeutic target. Distinct mutation profiles between maxillary and mandibular AMs indicate molecular diversity. In BRAF-negative cases, alternative oncogenic pathways involving SMO, FGFR2, and RAS may be actionable targets, underscoring the need for personalized treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":19615,"journal":{"name":"Oral diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mutational Landscape of Ameloblastoma: Analysis of BRAF and Other Key Mutations in Chinese Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Zhu You, Zihan Sima, Xiaowen Guo, Xuefen Li, Yanrui Feng, Ning Du, Heyu Zhang, Lisha Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/odi.15286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the prevalence of BRAF, SMO, KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, FGRF2, and CTNNB1 gene mutations in Chinese ameloblastoma (AM) patients and explore their associations with clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>DNA was extracted from 89 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded AM samples (9 unicystic and 80 conventional). PCR and Sanger sequencing were used to detect mutations, followed by statistical analysis to assess correlations between mutations and clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BRAF V600E mutations were significantly prevalent, occurring in 92% (59/64) of mandibular AMs compared to 40% (10/25) in maxillary AMs. SMO mutations were found in 20% (5/25) of maxillary and 3.1% (2/64) of mandibular AMs. FGFR2 mutations were detected in six maxillary and two mandibular AMs, while RAS mutations were present in four maxillary and one mandibular AM. No detectable HRAS, NRAS(G12), or CTNNB1 mutations were observed. BRAF mutations showed mutual exclusivity with SMO and FGFR2 mutations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations, particularly in mandibular AMs, suggests its potential as a diagnostic and therapeutic target. Distinct mutation profiles between maxillary and mandibular AMs indicate molecular diversity. In BRAF-negative cases, alternative oncogenic pathways involving SMO, FGFR2, and RAS may be actionable targets, underscoring the need for personalized treatment approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.15286\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.15286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mutational Landscape of Ameloblastoma: Analysis of BRAF and Other Key Mutations in Chinese Patients.
Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of BRAF, SMO, KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, FGRF2, and CTNNB1 gene mutations in Chinese ameloblastoma (AM) patients and explore their associations with clinical characteristics.
Materials and methods: DNA was extracted from 89 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded AM samples (9 unicystic and 80 conventional). PCR and Sanger sequencing were used to detect mutations, followed by statistical analysis to assess correlations between mutations and clinical variables.
Results: BRAF V600E mutations were significantly prevalent, occurring in 92% (59/64) of mandibular AMs compared to 40% (10/25) in maxillary AMs. SMO mutations were found in 20% (5/25) of maxillary and 3.1% (2/64) of mandibular AMs. FGFR2 mutations were detected in six maxillary and two mandibular AMs, while RAS mutations were present in four maxillary and one mandibular AM. No detectable HRAS, NRAS(G12), or CTNNB1 mutations were observed. BRAF mutations showed mutual exclusivity with SMO and FGFR2 mutations.
Conclusion: The high prevalence of BRAF V600E mutations, particularly in mandibular AMs, suggests its potential as a diagnostic and therapeutic target. Distinct mutation profiles between maxillary and mandibular AMs indicate molecular diversity. In BRAF-negative cases, alternative oncogenic pathways involving SMO, FGFR2, and RAS may be actionable targets, underscoring the need for personalized treatment approaches.
期刊介绍:
Oral Diseases is a multidisciplinary and international journal with a focus on head and neck disorders, edited by leaders in the field, Professor Giovanni Lodi (Editor-in-Chief, Milan, Italy), Professor Stefano Petti (Deputy Editor, Rome, Italy) and Associate Professor Gulshan Sunavala-Dossabhoy (Deputy Editor, Shreveport, LA, USA). The journal is pre-eminent in oral medicine. Oral Diseases specifically strives to link often-isolated areas of dentistry and medicine through broad-based scholarship that includes well-designed and controlled clinical research, analytical epidemiology, and the translation of basic science in pre-clinical studies. The journal typically publishes articles relevant to many related medical specialties including especially dermatology, gastroenterology, hematology, immunology, infectious diseases, neuropsychiatry, oncology and otolaryngology. The essential requirement is that all submitted research is hypothesis-driven, with significant positive and negative results both welcomed. Equal publication emphasis is placed on etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention and treatment.