产前案例学习对妊娠糖尿病妇女血糖控制和自我管理技能的影响:一项以患者为中心的非平行准实验研究

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S503359
Guifen Wen, Jinguo Zhai, Peixuan Wen, Fang Yang, Xiaoxia Xie
{"title":"产前案例学习对妊娠糖尿病妇女血糖控制和自我管理技能的影响:一项以患者为中心的非平行准实验研究","authors":"Guifen Wen, Jinguo Zhai, Peixuan Wen, Fang Yang, Xiaoxia Xie","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S503359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a growing global concern. GDM increases the risk of complications in both mothers and infants, including preeclampsia, macrosomia, and a higher likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes later in life. This study aimed to assess whether integrating case-based learning (CBL) with traditional education could improve glycemic control and patient outcomes in women with GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This non-parallel quasi-experimental study compared CBL interventions with traditional education in GDM women. Pregnant women from September 2022 to March 2023 received only traditional education (control group), whereas those from April to September 2023 received both case-based and traditional education (intervention group). The primary outcomes included fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level changes after the intervention. The secondary outcomes included self-management behavior changes (Self-Management Scale for Women with GDM), self-efficacy (Pregnancy Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale), GDM understanding (self-developed questionnaire), satisfaction, pregnancy weight gain, and macrosomia incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 GDM women were included, with the intervention and control groups containing 70 participants each. The intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose levels than the control group (<i>p</i><0.001). In addition, the intervention group demonstrated notable improvements in self-management behaviors, GDM knowledge, and patient satisfaction. The incidence of macrosomia was also significantly lower in the intervention group (1.6% vs 10.8%, <i>p</i>=0.034), indicating better neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBL could be incorporated into traditional education in GDM women to improve their self-management and self-efficacy for better glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes. Healthcare providers should be educated on the CBL and relevant policies should be developed to facilitate the implementation of CBL in the clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"451-462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Antepartum Case-Based Learning on Glycemic Control and Self-Management Skills in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Non-Parallel Quasi-Experimental Study.\",\"authors\":\"Guifen Wen, Jinguo Zhai, Peixuan Wen, Fang Yang, Xiaoxia Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S503359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a growing global concern. GDM increases the risk of complications in both mothers and infants, including preeclampsia, macrosomia, and a higher likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes later in life. This study aimed to assess whether integrating case-based learning (CBL) with traditional education could improve glycemic control and patient outcomes in women with GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This non-parallel quasi-experimental study compared CBL interventions with traditional education in GDM women. Pregnant women from September 2022 to March 2023 received only traditional education (control group), whereas those from April to September 2023 received both case-based and traditional education (intervention group). The primary outcomes included fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level changes after the intervention. The secondary outcomes included self-management behavior changes (Self-Management Scale for Women with GDM), self-efficacy (Pregnancy Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale), GDM understanding (self-developed questionnaire), satisfaction, pregnancy weight gain, and macrosomia incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 GDM women were included, with the intervention and control groups containing 70 participants each. The intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose levels than the control group (<i>p</i><0.001). In addition, the intervention group demonstrated notable improvements in self-management behaviors, GDM knowledge, and patient satisfaction. The incidence of macrosomia was also significantly lower in the intervention group (1.6% vs 10.8%, <i>p</i>=0.034), indicating better neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBL could be incorporated into traditional education in GDM women to improve their self-management and self-efficacy for better glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes. Healthcare providers should be educated on the CBL and relevant policies should be developed to facilitate the implementation of CBL in the clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"451-462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S503359\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S503359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是一个日益受到全球关注的问题。GDM增加了母亲和婴儿并发症的风险,包括先兆子痫、巨大儿,以及在以后的生活中患2型糖尿病的可能性更高。本研究旨在评估将基于案例的学习(CBL)与传统教育相结合是否可以改善GDM女性的血糖控制和患者预后。方法:这项非平行准实验研究比较了CBL干预与传统教育对GDM妇女的影响。2022年9月至2023年3月的孕妇只接受传统教育(对照组),而2023年4月至2023年9月的孕妇同时接受案例教育和传统教育(干预组)。主要结局包括干预后空腹和餐后2小时血糖水平的变化。次要结局包括自我管理行为改变(妊娠糖尿病妇女自我管理量表)、自我效能感(妊娠运动自我效能量表)、对妊娠糖尿病的理解(自行编制问卷)、满意度、妊娠体重增加、巨大儿发生率。结果:共纳入GDM女性140例,干预组和对照组各70例。干预组在空腹和餐后2小时血糖水平的降低明显高于对照组(pp=0.034),表明新生儿结局更好。结论:可将CBL纳入GDM妇女的传统教育中,提高她们的自我管理和自我效能感,改善血糖控制和妊娠结局。医疗保健提供者应接受有关CBL的教育,并应制定相关政策,以促进在临床实践中实施CBL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Antepartum Case-Based Learning on Glycemic Control and Self-Management Skills in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Non-Parallel Quasi-Experimental Study.

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a growing global concern. GDM increases the risk of complications in both mothers and infants, including preeclampsia, macrosomia, and a higher likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes later in life. This study aimed to assess whether integrating case-based learning (CBL) with traditional education could improve glycemic control and patient outcomes in women with GDM.

Methods: This non-parallel quasi-experimental study compared CBL interventions with traditional education in GDM women. Pregnant women from September 2022 to March 2023 received only traditional education (control group), whereas those from April to September 2023 received both case-based and traditional education (intervention group). The primary outcomes included fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level changes after the intervention. The secondary outcomes included self-management behavior changes (Self-Management Scale for Women with GDM), self-efficacy (Pregnancy Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale), GDM understanding (self-developed questionnaire), satisfaction, pregnancy weight gain, and macrosomia incidence.

Results: A total of 140 GDM women were included, with the intervention and control groups containing 70 participants each. The intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in fasting and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose levels than the control group (p<0.001). In addition, the intervention group demonstrated notable improvements in self-management behaviors, GDM knowledge, and patient satisfaction. The incidence of macrosomia was also significantly lower in the intervention group (1.6% vs 10.8%, p=0.034), indicating better neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion: CBL could be incorporated into traditional education in GDM women to improve their self-management and self-efficacy for better glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes. Healthcare providers should be educated on the CBL and relevant policies should be developed to facilitate the implementation of CBL in the clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信