目前在狗身上测试的犬内脏利什曼病疫苗效果如何?系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Josiane Aparecida Martiniano de Pádua, Tuane Ferreira Melo, Rafaella Silva Andrade, Marina Martins de Oliveira, Ana Laura Grossi de Oliveira, Andressa Mariana Saldanha-Elias, Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Elaine Maria Seles Dorneles, Ana Paula Peconick, Kelly Moura Keller
{"title":"目前在狗身上测试的犬内脏利什曼病疫苗效果如何?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Josiane Aparecida Martiniano de Pádua, Tuane Ferreira Melo, Rafaella Silva Andrade, Marina Martins de Oliveira, Ana Laura Grossi de Oliveira, Andressa Mariana Saldanha-Elias, Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Elaine Maria Seles Dorneles, Ana Paula Peconick, Kelly Moura Keller","doi":"10.1111/pim.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is a zoonotic disease of great worldwide importance and can be prevented by vaccinating seronegative dogs. The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to verify the efficacy rate of vaccines tested in dogs against CVL or L. infantum infection. We used PRISMA guidelines for this review and Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Scielo and CABI to find studies about vaccines against CVL in dogs. Articles were analysed and grouped according to the antigens used. The risk of bias analysis was performed using SYRCLE's RoB tool and meta-analysis using R Statistical language. The final analysis was conducted using 22 studies that assessed DNA, excreted/secreted proteins and subunit vaccines, involving a total of 92 animals, 96 animals and 78 animals, respectively. Regarding DNA vaccines, the analyses revealed non-significant results in terms of preventing parasite presence in the organs or the onset of clinical signs. However, subunit vaccines demonstrated statistically significant results concerning parasite presence in the organs, but not when it comes to clinical signs. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference observed in parasite burden in the organs or clinical signs for the excreted/secreted vaccines. The meta-analysis indicated that subunit and excreted/secreted protein vaccines were significantly more effective in preventing parasites in vaccinated animals compared to both DNA-based vaccines and control groups. Heterogeneity among studies is a limitation, emphasising the need for standardised protocols for reliable comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":19931,"journal":{"name":"Parasite Immunology","volume":"47 3","pages":"e70006"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Effective Are the Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis Vaccines Currently Being Tested in Dogs? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Josiane Aparecida Martiniano de Pádua, Tuane Ferreira Melo, Rafaella Silva Andrade, Marina Martins de Oliveira, Ana Laura Grossi de Oliveira, Andressa Mariana Saldanha-Elias, Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Elaine Maria Seles Dorneles, Ana Paula Peconick, Kelly Moura Keller\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pim.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is a zoonotic disease of great worldwide importance and can be prevented by vaccinating seronegative dogs. The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to verify the efficacy rate of vaccines tested in dogs against CVL or L. infantum infection. We used PRISMA guidelines for this review and Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Scielo and CABI to find studies about vaccines against CVL in dogs. Articles were analysed and grouped according to the antigens used. The risk of bias analysis was performed using SYRCLE's RoB tool and meta-analysis using R Statistical language. The final analysis was conducted using 22 studies that assessed DNA, excreted/secreted proteins and subunit vaccines, involving a total of 92 animals, 96 animals and 78 animals, respectively. Regarding DNA vaccines, the analyses revealed non-significant results in terms of preventing parasite presence in the organs or the onset of clinical signs. However, subunit vaccines demonstrated statistically significant results concerning parasite presence in the organs, but not when it comes to clinical signs. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference observed in parasite burden in the organs or clinical signs for the excreted/secreted vaccines. The meta-analysis indicated that subunit and excreted/secreted protein vaccines were significantly more effective in preventing parasites in vaccinated animals compared to both DNA-based vaccines and control groups. Heterogeneity among studies is a limitation, emphasising the need for standardised protocols for reliable comparisons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parasite Immunology\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"e70006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934299/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parasite Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pim.70006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasite Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pim.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

犬内脏利什曼病(CVL)是一种具有世界重要性的人畜共患疾病,可通过接种血清阴性犬来预防。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是验证在狗身上测试的疫苗对CVL或婴儿乳杆菌感染的有效性。我们使用PRISMA指南进行本综述,并使用Pubmed、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane、Scielo和CABI来查找有关犬抗CVL疫苗的研究。根据所用抗原对文章进行分析和分组。使用sycle的RoB工具进行偏倚风险分析,使用R Statistical语言进行meta分析。最后的分析是利用22项研究进行的,这些研究评估了DNA、排泄/分泌蛋白质和亚单位疫苗,分别涉及92只动物、96只动物和78只动物。关于DNA疫苗,分析显示,在预防器官中寄生虫存在或临床症状出现方面,结果不显著。然而,亚单位疫苗对器官中寄生虫的存在表现出统计上显著的结果,但在临床症状方面则不然。此外,排泄/分泌疫苗在器官寄生虫负荷或临床症状方面没有统计学上的显著差异。荟萃分析表明,与基于dna的疫苗和对照组相比,亚基和排泄/分泌蛋白疫苗在预防接种动物寄生虫方面明显更有效。研究之间的异质性是一个限制,强调需要标准化的方案来进行可靠的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Effective Are the Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis Vaccines Currently Being Tested in Dogs? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is a zoonotic disease of great worldwide importance and can be prevented by vaccinating seronegative dogs. The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to verify the efficacy rate of vaccines tested in dogs against CVL or L. infantum infection. We used PRISMA guidelines for this review and Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Scielo and CABI to find studies about vaccines against CVL in dogs. Articles were analysed and grouped according to the antigens used. The risk of bias analysis was performed using SYRCLE's RoB tool and meta-analysis using R Statistical language. The final analysis was conducted using 22 studies that assessed DNA, excreted/secreted proteins and subunit vaccines, involving a total of 92 animals, 96 animals and 78 animals, respectively. Regarding DNA vaccines, the analyses revealed non-significant results in terms of preventing parasite presence in the organs or the onset of clinical signs. However, subunit vaccines demonstrated statistically significant results concerning parasite presence in the organs, but not when it comes to clinical signs. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference observed in parasite burden in the organs or clinical signs for the excreted/secreted vaccines. The meta-analysis indicated that subunit and excreted/secreted protein vaccines were significantly more effective in preventing parasites in vaccinated animals compared to both DNA-based vaccines and control groups. Heterogeneity among studies is a limitation, emphasising the need for standardised protocols for reliable comparisons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parasite Immunology
Parasite Immunology 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Parasite Immunology is an international journal devoted to research on all aspects of parasite immunology in human and animal hosts. Emphasis has been placed on how hosts control parasites, and the immunopathological reactions which take place in the course of parasitic infections. The Journal welcomes original work on all parasites, particularly human parasitology, helminths, protozoa and ectoparasites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信