{"title":"老年乳腺癌保乳手术患者放疗遗漏的新纳入标准。","authors":"Y L Heng, J Xiao, L Q Liu, J Luo, J Luo, J Chen","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_79_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy is the standard treatment for achieving local control and survival benefits in breast cancer patients. However, the necessity of radiotherapy for all elderly patients following BCS is debated due to the potential for overtreatment and the associated risks and side effects, particularly for those at lower risk of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to redefine the criteria for elderly breast cancer patients eligible for radiotherapy omission after BCS, without compromising survival benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from breast cancer patients with T1-2N0-1M0 diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program for analysis. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyzes were conducted to identify risk factors for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). A nomogram and risk stratification model were developed, with a concordance index and calibration curve employed to demonstrate the nomogram's accuracy and predictive capability. Validation of radiotherapy's survival benefit for patients in different risk strata was conducted via subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histological grade, estrogen receptor status, tumor size, and nodal metastasis stage were identified as independent risk factors for BCSS. These factors were incorporated into a nomogram to predict 3- and 5-year BCSS for patients. Risk stratification indicated that radiotherapy significantly improved BCSS in the high-risk group (HR = 0.540 [0.402-0.724], P < 0.001) but did not in the low-risk (HR = 0.526 [0.154-1.798], P = 0.305) and intermediate-risk groups (HR = 0.588 [0.33-1.05], P = 0.073). Subgroup analysis showed that some patients not meeting the CALGB 9,343 criteria could also be exempt from radiotherapy. Importantly, we found that patients over 80 years of age did not derive a survival benefit from radiotherapy, regardless of clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study broadens the criteria for radiotherapy omission, potentially assisting clinicians in making radiotherapy decisions for elderly breast cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19431,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"27 12","pages":"1417-1428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Inclusion Criteria for Radiotherapy Omission in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients with Breast-Conserving Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Y L Heng, J Xiao, L Q Liu, J Luo, J Luo, J Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/njcp.njcp_79_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy is the standard treatment for achieving local control and survival benefits in breast cancer patients. However, the necessity of radiotherapy for all elderly patients following BCS is debated due to the potential for overtreatment and the associated risks and side effects, particularly for those at lower risk of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to redefine the criteria for elderly breast cancer patients eligible for radiotherapy omission after BCS, without compromising survival benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from breast cancer patients with T1-2N0-1M0 diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program for analysis. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyzes were conducted to identify risk factors for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). A nomogram and risk stratification model were developed, with a concordance index and calibration curve employed to demonstrate the nomogram's accuracy and predictive capability. Validation of radiotherapy's survival benefit for patients in different risk strata was conducted via subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histological grade, estrogen receptor status, tumor size, and nodal metastasis stage were identified as independent risk factors for BCSS. These factors were incorporated into a nomogram to predict 3- and 5-year BCSS for patients. Risk stratification indicated that radiotherapy significantly improved BCSS in the high-risk group (HR = 0.540 [0.402-0.724], P < 0.001) but did not in the low-risk (HR = 0.526 [0.154-1.798], P = 0.305) and intermediate-risk groups (HR = 0.588 [0.33-1.05], P = 0.073). Subgroup analysis showed that some patients not meeting the CALGB 9,343 criteria could also be exempt from radiotherapy. Importantly, we found that patients over 80 years of age did not derive a survival benefit from radiotherapy, regardless of clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study broadens the criteria for radiotherapy omission, potentially assisting clinicians in making radiotherapy decisions for elderly breast cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"27 12\",\"pages\":\"1417-1428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_79_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_79_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:保乳手术加放疗是乳腺癌患者局部控制和生存获益的标准治疗方法。然而,由于过度治疗的可能性以及相关的风险和副作用,特别是对于那些复发风险较低的老年BCS患者,对所有老年BCS患者进行放疗的必要性存在争议。目的:本研究旨在重新定义老年乳腺癌患者在不影响生存获益的情况下BCS后是否有资格省略放疗的标准。方法:从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)项目中提取2010年至2015年诊断为T1-2N0-1M0的乳腺癌患者的数据进行分析。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier图和log-rank检验。进行单因素和多因素Cox分析,以确定乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)的危险因素。建立了nomogram和风险分层模型,并采用一致性指数和校准曲线来验证nomogram的准确性和预测能力。通过亚组分析验证不同风险层患者放疗的生存获益。结果:组织学分级、雌激素受体状态、肿瘤大小和淋巴结转移分期是BCSS的独立危险因素。这些因素被纳入nomogram来预测患者3年和5年的BCSS。风险分层显示,放疗可显著改善高危组BCSS (HR = 0.540 [0.402-0.724], P < 0.001),但对低危组(HR = 0.526 [0.154-1.798], P = 0.305)和中危组(HR = 0.588 [0.33-1.05], P = 0.073)无显著改善。亚组分析显示,部分不符合CALGB 9343标准的患者也可以免除放疗。重要的是,我们发现,无论临床特征如何,80岁以上的患者并没有从放疗中获得生存益处。结论:本研究拓宽了放疗遗漏的判定标准,有助于临床医生对老年乳腺癌患者进行放疗决策。
A Novel Inclusion Criteria for Radiotherapy Omission in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients with Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy is the standard treatment for achieving local control and survival benefits in breast cancer patients. However, the necessity of radiotherapy for all elderly patients following BCS is debated due to the potential for overtreatment and the associated risks and side effects, particularly for those at lower risk of recurrence.
Aims: This study aims to redefine the criteria for elderly breast cancer patients eligible for radiotherapy omission after BCS, without compromising survival benefits.
Methods: Data from breast cancer patients with T1-2N0-1M0 diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program for analysis. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyzes were conducted to identify risk factors for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). A nomogram and risk stratification model were developed, with a concordance index and calibration curve employed to demonstrate the nomogram's accuracy and predictive capability. Validation of radiotherapy's survival benefit for patients in different risk strata was conducted via subgroup analysis.
Results: Histological grade, estrogen receptor status, tumor size, and nodal metastasis stage were identified as independent risk factors for BCSS. These factors were incorporated into a nomogram to predict 3- and 5-year BCSS for patients. Risk stratification indicated that radiotherapy significantly improved BCSS in the high-risk group (HR = 0.540 [0.402-0.724], P < 0.001) but did not in the low-risk (HR = 0.526 [0.154-1.798], P = 0.305) and intermediate-risk groups (HR = 0.588 [0.33-1.05], P = 0.073). Subgroup analysis showed that some patients not meeting the CALGB 9,343 criteria could also be exempt from radiotherapy. Importantly, we found that patients over 80 years of age did not derive a survival benefit from radiotherapy, regardless of clinical characteristics.
Conclusions: This study broadens the criteria for radiotherapy omission, potentially assisting clinicians in making radiotherapy decisions for elderly breast cancer patients.
期刊介绍:
The Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice is a Monthly peer-reviewed international journal published by the Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria. The journal’s full text is available online at www.njcponline.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal makes a token charge for submission, processing and publication of manuscripts including color reproduction of photographs.