远程医疗在青光眼管理:病人的观点。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Glaucoma Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002558
Angela J Oh, Ella Bouris, Brayden K Leyva, Mashal Malik, Joseph Caprioli
{"title":"远程医疗在青光眼管理:病人的观点。","authors":"Angela J Oh, Ella Bouris, Brayden K Leyva, Mashal Malik, Joseph Caprioli","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Patient satisfaction and perspectives on telemedicine for glaucoma are crucial for validating the efficacy of remote health care. This study underscores its acceptance by patients in a single academic practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate patient satisfaction and preferences with telemedicine visits integrated into a glaucoma practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study of patients of a single glaucoma specialist's telemedicine practice was performed using an online questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 219 patients contacted, 153 (69%, mean age 67.0 y, 58% women) completed the survey. 68% had glaucoma (43% mild, 44% moderate, and 13% severe) and 32% were glaucoma suspects. Patients had been under the care of the specialist for 10±6.2 years, with 41% having undergone surgery with the specialist. The mean number of prior office visits with the specialist was 9.7±6.3 (range 1-24 y) with an average of 0.8 (range 0-3) prior telemedicine visits at the time of the survey. Ninety-seven percent reported satisfaction with integrated telehealth visits, and 78% would recommend telemedicine visits. Ninety-three percent planned to continue with telemedicine; 5 patients (3%) requested switching to in-person only visits with another provider. Compared with their in-person visits, patients found integrated telemedicine visits less time-consuming and more convenient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates high satisfaction and support for integrated telemedicine visits among glaucoma patients within a specialized practice setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":"365-370"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine in Glaucoma Management: Patient Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Angela J Oh, Ella Bouris, Brayden K Leyva, Mashal Malik, Joseph Caprioli\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Patient satisfaction and perspectives on telemedicine for glaucoma are crucial for validating the efficacy of remote health care. This study underscores its acceptance by patients in a single academic practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate patient satisfaction and preferences with telemedicine visits integrated into a glaucoma practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study of patients of a single glaucoma specialist's telemedicine practice was performed using an online questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 219 patients contacted, 153 (69%, mean age 67.0 y, 58% women) completed the survey. 68% had glaucoma (43% mild, 44% moderate, and 13% severe) and 32% were glaucoma suspects. Patients had been under the care of the specialist for 10±6.2 years, with 41% having undergone surgery with the specialist. The mean number of prior office visits with the specialist was 9.7±6.3 (range 1-24 y) with an average of 0.8 (range 0-3) prior telemedicine visits at the time of the survey. Ninety-seven percent reported satisfaction with integrated telehealth visits, and 78% would recommend telemedicine visits. Ninety-three percent planned to continue with telemedicine; 5 patients (3%) requested switching to in-person only visits with another provider. Compared with their in-person visits, patients found integrated telemedicine visits less time-consuming and more convenient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates high satisfaction and support for integrated telemedicine visits among glaucoma patients within a specialized practice setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"365-370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002558\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实践:患者满意度和对青光眼远程医疗的看法对于验证远程医疗的有效性至关重要。这项研究强调了患者在单一学术实践中的接受程度。目的:评估青光眼患者对远程医疗就诊的满意度和偏好。方法:采用在线问卷调查的方式,对一位青光眼专科医生远程医疗的患者进行前瞻性观察研究。结果:在接触的219例患者中,153例(69%,平均年龄67.0岁,58%女性)完成了调查。68%为青光眼(轻度43%,中度44%,重度13%),32%为疑似青光眼。患者在专科医生护理10±6.2年,其中41%的患者接受过专科医生的手术。在调查时,与专家的平均办公室就诊次数为9.7±6.3次(范围1-24),平均为0.8次(范围0-3)。97%的人对综合远程医疗就诊表示满意,78%的人会推荐远程医疗就诊。93%的人计划继续使用远程医疗;5名患者(3%)要求改为与另一名医疗服务提供者面对面就诊。与亲自就诊相比,患者发现综合远程医疗就诊耗时更少,也更方便。结论:本研究显示了青光眼患者在专业实践环境下对综合远程医疗就诊的高满意度和支持度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Telemedicine in Glaucoma Management: Patient Perspectives.

Prcis: Patient satisfaction and perspectives on telemedicine for glaucoma are crucial for validating the efficacy of remote health care. This study underscores its acceptance by patients in a single academic practice.

Purpose: To evaluate patient satisfaction and preferences with telemedicine visits integrated into a glaucoma practice.

Methods: A prospective observational study of patients of a single glaucoma specialist's telemedicine practice was performed using an online questionnaire.

Results: Of the 219 patients contacted, 153 (69%, mean age 67.0 y, 58% women) completed the survey. 68% had glaucoma (43% mild, 44% moderate, and 13% severe) and 32% were glaucoma suspects. Patients had been under the care of the specialist for 10±6.2 years, with 41% having undergone surgery with the specialist. The mean number of prior office visits with the specialist was 9.7±6.3 (range 1-24 y) with an average of 0.8 (range 0-3) prior telemedicine visits at the time of the survey. Ninety-seven percent reported satisfaction with integrated telehealth visits, and 78% would recommend telemedicine visits. Ninety-three percent planned to continue with telemedicine; 5 patients (3%) requested switching to in-person only visits with another provider. Compared with their in-person visits, patients found integrated telemedicine visits less time-consuming and more convenient.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates high satisfaction and support for integrated telemedicine visits among glaucoma patients within a specialized practice setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信