{"title":"hbeag阴性慢性乙型肝炎患者停用替诺福韦、富马酸替诺福韦二吡酯或恩替卡韦后病毒学和临床复发的发生率","authors":"Cheng-Hao Tseng, Teng-Yu Lee, Chi-Yi Chen, Chung-Feng Huang, Po-Yueh Chen, Tyng-Yuan Jang, Tzeng-Huey Yang, Chia-Ching Wu, Yao-Chun Hsu","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The relapse pattern following the discontinuation of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the 2-year incidences of virological and clinical relapses among patients who discontinued TAF versus those who discontinued tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or entecavir (ETV).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This multicenter retrospective study enrolled noncirrhotic hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative CHB patients who discontinued TAF, TDF, or ETV with undetectable HBV DNA at treatment cessation. For patients who switched from ETV or TDF to TAF, a minimum TAF exposure duration of 12 months was required for inclusion in the off-TAF group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to adjust for baseline differences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 162 patients (off-TAF: 37, off-TDF: 87, off-ETV: 38) were included in the primary analysis. The 2-year cumulative incidence of virological relapse was significantly higher in the off-TAF group (85.0%) compared to the off-TDF group (69.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.024) and the off-ETV group (51.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.010). Similarly, the 2-year cumulative incidence of clinical relapse was significantly higher in the off-TAF group (62.4%) compared to the off-TDF group (39.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.026) and the off-ETV group (22.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.024). Consistent results were observed in patients meeting the 2012 APASL stopping criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>HBeAg-negative patients who discontinue TAF face a higher risk of both virological and clinical relapses compared to those discontinuing TDF or ETV. These findings underscore the need for more intense monitoring in CHB patients after TAF cessation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"40 5","pages":"1245-1254"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidences of Virological and Clinical Relapses After Cessation of Tenofovir Alafenamide, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, or Entecavir in Patients With HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-Hao Tseng, Teng-Yu Lee, Chi-Yi Chen, Chung-Feng Huang, Po-Yueh Chen, Tyng-Yuan Jang, Tzeng-Huey Yang, Chia-Ching Wu, Yao-Chun Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgh.16923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The relapse pattern following the discontinuation of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the 2-year incidences of virological and clinical relapses among patients who discontinued TAF versus those who discontinued tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or entecavir (ETV).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This multicenter retrospective study enrolled noncirrhotic hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative CHB patients who discontinued TAF, TDF, or ETV with undetectable HBV DNA at treatment cessation. For patients who switched from ETV or TDF to TAF, a minimum TAF exposure duration of 12 months was required for inclusion in the off-TAF group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to adjust for baseline differences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 162 patients (off-TAF: 37, off-TDF: 87, off-ETV: 38) were included in the primary analysis. The 2-year cumulative incidence of virological relapse was significantly higher in the off-TAF group (85.0%) compared to the off-TDF group (69.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.024) and the off-ETV group (51.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.010). Similarly, the 2-year cumulative incidence of clinical relapse was significantly higher in the off-TAF group (62.4%) compared to the off-TDF group (39.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.026) and the off-ETV group (22.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.024). Consistent results were observed in patients meeting the 2012 APASL stopping criteria.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>HBeAg-negative patients who discontinue TAF face a higher risk of both virological and clinical relapses compared to those discontinuing TDF or ETV. These findings underscore the need for more intense monitoring in CHB patients after TAF cessation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"1245-1254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgh.16923\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgh.16923","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incidences of Virological and Clinical Relapses After Cessation of Tenofovir Alafenamide, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, or Entecavir in Patients With HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B
Background and Aim
The relapse pattern following the discontinuation of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the 2-year incidences of virological and clinical relapses among patients who discontinued TAF versus those who discontinued tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or entecavir (ETV).
Methods
This multicenter retrospective study enrolled noncirrhotic hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative CHB patients who discontinued TAF, TDF, or ETV with undetectable HBV DNA at treatment cessation. For patients who switched from ETV or TDF to TAF, a minimum TAF exposure duration of 12 months was required for inclusion in the off-TAF group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to adjust for baseline differences.
Results
A total of 162 patients (off-TAF: 37, off-TDF: 87, off-ETV: 38) were included in the primary analysis. The 2-year cumulative incidence of virological relapse was significantly higher in the off-TAF group (85.0%) compared to the off-TDF group (69.5%, p = 0.024) and the off-ETV group (51.5%, p = 0.010). Similarly, the 2-year cumulative incidence of clinical relapse was significantly higher in the off-TAF group (62.4%) compared to the off-TDF group (39.0%, p = 0.026) and the off-ETV group (22.5%, p = 0.024). Consistent results were observed in patients meeting the 2012 APASL stopping criteria.
Conclusions
HBeAg-negative patients who discontinue TAF face a higher risk of both virological and clinical relapses compared to those discontinuing TDF or ETV. These findings underscore the need for more intense monitoring in CHB patients after TAF cessation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.