低速富血小板纤维蛋白膜联合脱矿冻干同种异体骨移植(DFDBA)与胶原膜联合DFDBA治疗III期牙周炎不含骨内缺损的比较:一项随机对照临床试验

IF 1.9 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/6393105
Najeeb Almoliky, Manal Hosny, Weam Elbattawy, Karim Fawzy El-Sayed
{"title":"低速富血小板纤维蛋白膜联合脱矿冻干同种异体骨移植(DFDBA)与胶原膜联合DFDBA治疗III期牙周炎不含骨内缺损的比较:一项随机对照临床试验","authors":"Najeeb Almoliky, Manal Hosny, Weam Elbattawy, Karim Fawzy El-Sayed","doi":"10.1155/ijod/6393105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Noncontained (1- or combined 1- to 2-wall) periodontal intraosseous defects represent challenging clinical situations with unpredictable surgical therapeutic outcomes. This randomized clinical trial assessed demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) with low speed-platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane compared to DFDBA with collagen membrane (CM) in the surgical periodontal therapy of noncontained intraosseous defects of stage III periodontitis patients. <b>Methodology:</b> Twenty-two stage III periodontitis patients with noncontained intraosseous defects measuring ≥3 mm and clinical attachment loss ≥5 mm were randomly allocated into two groups: test group (low-speed PRF membrane + DFDBA) and control group (CM + DFDBA), with 11 participants per group. Clinical and radiographic assessments were conducted at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months for clinical attachment level (CAL; primary outcome), gingival recession depth (GRD), probing depth (PD), full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) and full mouth plaque score (FMPS), radiographic bone fill and radiographic linear defect depth (RLDD; all secondary outcomes). <b>Results:</b> The mean (±SD) CAL-gain for the test group was 2.45 (±1.51), 2.91 (±1.70), 2.91 (±1.87), and 2.82 (±1.83) mm, while for the control group 2.82 (±1.25), 3.27 (±1.27), 3.00 (±1.41), and 2.64 (±1.50) mm at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively, with no significant intergroup differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Despite the absence of significant intergroup differences, both groups demonstrated significant intragroup improvement in CAL- and PD-gain, and RLDD-reduction at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months as well as RLDD improvement at 12 months (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> PRF membranes, in conjunction with DFDBA, show significant improvement of periodontal clinical and radiographic parameters, comparable to CMs with DFDBA. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03922503.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6393105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872290/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-Speed Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane in Conjunction With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA) Compared to Collagen Membrane With DFDBA in Noncontained Intraosseous Defects of Stage III Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Najeeb Almoliky, Manal Hosny, Weam Elbattawy, Karim Fawzy El-Sayed\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijod/6393105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Noncontained (1- or combined 1- to 2-wall) periodontal intraosseous defects represent challenging clinical situations with unpredictable surgical therapeutic outcomes. This randomized clinical trial assessed demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) with low speed-platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane compared to DFDBA with collagen membrane (CM) in the surgical periodontal therapy of noncontained intraosseous defects of stage III periodontitis patients. <b>Methodology:</b> Twenty-two stage III periodontitis patients with noncontained intraosseous defects measuring ≥3 mm and clinical attachment loss ≥5 mm were randomly allocated into two groups: test group (low-speed PRF membrane + DFDBA) and control group (CM + DFDBA), with 11 participants per group. Clinical and radiographic assessments were conducted at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months for clinical attachment level (CAL; primary outcome), gingival recession depth (GRD), probing depth (PD), full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) and full mouth plaque score (FMPS), radiographic bone fill and radiographic linear defect depth (RLDD; all secondary outcomes). <b>Results:</b> The mean (±SD) CAL-gain for the test group was 2.45 (±1.51), 2.91 (±1.70), 2.91 (±1.87), and 2.82 (±1.83) mm, while for the control group 2.82 (±1.25), 3.27 (±1.27), 3.00 (±1.41), and 2.64 (±1.50) mm at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively, with no significant intergroup differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Despite the absence of significant intergroup differences, both groups demonstrated significant intragroup improvement in CAL- and PD-gain, and RLDD-reduction at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months as well as RLDD improvement at 12 months (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> PRF membranes, in conjunction with DFDBA, show significant improvement of periodontal clinical and radiographic parameters, comparable to CMs with DFDBA. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03922503.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"6393105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872290/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/6393105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/6393105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:不含(1-或合并1- 2-壁)牙周骨内缺损具有挑战性的临床情况和不可预测的手术治疗结果。这项随机临床试验评估了低血小板富纤维蛋白(PRF)膜脱矿冻干骨同种异体移植(DFDBA)与胶原膜脱矿冻干骨同种异体移植(DFDBA)在III期牙周炎患者非包容性骨内缺损手术治疗中的效果。方法:将22例非包涵性骨内缺损≥3mm且临床附着缺失≥5mm的III期牙周炎患者随机分为试验组(低速PRF膜+ DFDBA)和对照组(CM + DFDBA),每组11人。在基线、3、6、9和12个月对临床依恋水平(CAL;主要结果),牙龈退缩深度(GRD),探探深度(PD),全口出血评分(FMBS)和全口菌斑评分(FMPS), x线片骨填充和x线片线性缺损深度(RLDD);所有次要结果)。结果:试验组3、6、9、12个月cal -增益均值(±SD)分别为2.45(±1.51)、2.91(±1.70)、2.91(±1.87)、2.82(±1.83)mm,对照组3、6、9、12个月cal -增益均值(±SD)分别为2.82(±1.25)、3.27(±1.27)、3.00(±1.41)、2.64(±1.50)mm,组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。尽管组间差异不显著,但两组在3、6、9和12个月时CAL-和pd -增加、RLDD减少以及12个月时RLDD改善方面均表现出组内显著改善(p < 0.05)。结论:PRF膜联合DFDBA可显著改善牙周临床和影像学参数,与CMs联合DFDBA相当。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03922503。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low-Speed Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane in Conjunction With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA) Compared to Collagen Membrane With DFDBA in Noncontained Intraosseous Defects of Stage III Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Aim: Noncontained (1- or combined 1- to 2-wall) periodontal intraosseous defects represent challenging clinical situations with unpredictable surgical therapeutic outcomes. This randomized clinical trial assessed demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) with low speed-platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane compared to DFDBA with collagen membrane (CM) in the surgical periodontal therapy of noncontained intraosseous defects of stage III periodontitis patients. Methodology: Twenty-two stage III periodontitis patients with noncontained intraosseous defects measuring ≥3 mm and clinical attachment loss ≥5 mm were randomly allocated into two groups: test group (low-speed PRF membrane + DFDBA) and control group (CM + DFDBA), with 11 participants per group. Clinical and radiographic assessments were conducted at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months for clinical attachment level (CAL; primary outcome), gingival recession depth (GRD), probing depth (PD), full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) and full mouth plaque score (FMPS), radiographic bone fill and radiographic linear defect depth (RLDD; all secondary outcomes). Results: The mean (±SD) CAL-gain for the test group was 2.45 (±1.51), 2.91 (±1.70), 2.91 (±1.87), and 2.82 (±1.83) mm, while for the control group 2.82 (±1.25), 3.27 (±1.27), 3.00 (±1.41), and 2.64 (±1.50) mm at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively, with no significant intergroup differences (p > 0.05). Despite the absence of significant intergroup differences, both groups demonstrated significant intragroup improvement in CAL- and PD-gain, and RLDD-reduction at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months as well as RLDD improvement at 12 months (p < 0.05). Conclusion: PRF membranes, in conjunction with DFDBA, show significant improvement of periodontal clinical and radiographic parameters, comparable to CMs with DFDBA. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03922503.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信