切除、消融和神经调节性颞叶癫痫手术中癫痫发作和认知结局的比较回顾。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chengyuan Wu, Robyn M Busch, Daniel L Drane, Patricia Dugan, Demitre Serletis, Brett Youngerman, Lara Jehi
{"title":"切除、消融和神经调节性颞叶癫痫手术中癫痫发作和认知结局的比较回顾。","authors":"Chengyuan Wu, Robyn M Busch, Daniel L Drane, Patricia Dugan, Demitre Serletis, Brett Youngerman, Lara Jehi","doi":"10.1177/15357597251318564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resective surgery for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy remains underutilized in the United States. While anteromesial temporal lobectomy consistently achieves the highest rates of long-term seizure freedom, it comes with greater risks for memory and language decline. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy and neuromodulation have gained popularity due to perceived lower surgical risk and faster recovery, although they yield lower rates of sustained seizure freedom. Neuromodulation with vagus nerve, deep brain, or responsive neurostimulation provides an option for patients ineligible for resection or ablation, but overall seizure outcomes remain modest. Balancing improved seizure control with open resection against the potential cognitive advantages of less invasive treatments is complex, requiring careful patient selection. Future research must refine these approaches to optimize results. Thoughtful, individualized decision-making, guided by each patient's clinical scenario and goals, is paramount for achieving the best balance between seizure freedom, cognitive preservation, and overall patient outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":11742,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Currents","volume":" ","pages":"15357597251318564"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Review of Seizure and Cognitive Outcomes in Resective, Ablative, and Neuromodulatory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Chengyuan Wu, Robyn M Busch, Daniel L Drane, Patricia Dugan, Demitre Serletis, Brett Youngerman, Lara Jehi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15357597251318564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Resective surgery for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy remains underutilized in the United States. While anteromesial temporal lobectomy consistently achieves the highest rates of long-term seizure freedom, it comes with greater risks for memory and language decline. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy and neuromodulation have gained popularity due to perceived lower surgical risk and faster recovery, although they yield lower rates of sustained seizure freedom. Neuromodulation with vagus nerve, deep brain, or responsive neurostimulation provides an option for patients ineligible for resection or ablation, but overall seizure outcomes remain modest. Balancing improved seizure control with open resection against the potential cognitive advantages of less invasive treatments is complex, requiring careful patient selection. Future research must refine these approaches to optimize results. Thoughtful, individualized decision-making, guided by each patient's clinical scenario and goals, is paramount for achieving the best balance between seizure freedom, cognitive preservation, and overall patient outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy Currents\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15357597251318564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869217/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy Currents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15357597251318564\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Currents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15357597251318564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

切除手术治疗耐药颞叶癫痫在美国仍未得到充分利用。虽然颞叶前叶切除术的长期癫痫发作率最高,但记忆力和语言能力下降的风险更大。磁共振成像引导的激光间质热疗法和神经调节疗法因其较低的手术风险和更快的恢复而受到欢迎,尽管它们产生较低的持续发作自由率。迷走神经、深部脑或反应性神经刺激的神经调节为不适合切除或消融术的患者提供了选择,但总体癫痫发作结果仍然温和。平衡开放切除改善癫痫控制和微创治疗潜在的认知优势是复杂的,需要仔细选择患者。未来的研究必须改进这些方法以优化结果。在每位患者的临床情况和目标的指导下,深思熟虑的、个性化的决策对于实现癫痫发作自由、认知保护和患者整体预后之间的最佳平衡至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Review of Seizure and Cognitive Outcomes in Resective, Ablative, and Neuromodulatory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgery.

Resective surgery for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy remains underutilized in the United States. While anteromesial temporal lobectomy consistently achieves the highest rates of long-term seizure freedom, it comes with greater risks for memory and language decline. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy and neuromodulation have gained popularity due to perceived lower surgical risk and faster recovery, although they yield lower rates of sustained seizure freedom. Neuromodulation with vagus nerve, deep brain, or responsive neurostimulation provides an option for patients ineligible for resection or ablation, but overall seizure outcomes remain modest. Balancing improved seizure control with open resection against the potential cognitive advantages of less invasive treatments is complex, requiring careful patient selection. Future research must refine these approaches to optimize results. Thoughtful, individualized decision-making, guided by each patient's clinical scenario and goals, is paramount for achieving the best balance between seizure freedom, cognitive preservation, and overall patient outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy Currents
Epilepsy Currents CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Currents is an open access, bi-monthly current-awareness journal providing reviews, commentaries and abstracts from the world’s literature on the research and treatment of epilepsy. Epilepsy Currents surveys and comments on all important research and developments in a format that is easy to read and reference. Each issue is divided into two main sections: Basic Science and Clinical Science. An outstanding Editorial Board reviews the literature and assigns topics and articles to world experts for comment. In addition, the Editors commission authoritative review articles on important subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信