使用难以治疗的耐药指数衡量各国抗生素耐药流行率与抗生素可及性之间的不平衡:范围审查和概念建议。

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Morgan K Walker, Emad A Chishti, Christina Yek, Sadia Sarzynski, Sahil Angelo, Jennifer Cohn, Alicia A Livinski, Sameer S Kadri
{"title":"使用难以治疗的耐药指数衡量各国抗生素耐药流行率与抗生素可及性之间的不平衡:范围审查和概念建议。","authors":"Morgan K Walker, Emad A Chishti, Christina Yek, Sadia Sarzynski, Sahil Angelo, Jennifer Cohn, Alicia A Livinski, Sameer S Kadri","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inferring the impact of antimicrobial resistance on patient outcomes is challenging, given the variability in antibiotic access across countries and over time. By denoting resistance to all highly safe and effective antibiotics, the difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) definition offers a framework for such assessments globally.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to conduct a scoping review to understand the international adoption, scalability, and prognostic utility of DTR and enable solutions to incorporate antibiotic access into the DTR framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data sources: Data sources included Agricola, Embase, Global Index Medicus, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science: BIOSIS and Core Collection.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Study eligibility criteria included original research publications occurring after January 2018 using the term 'difficult-to-treat resistance' to describe antimicrobial-resistant bacterial isolates demonstrating resistance to all first-line antibiotics (i.e. all β-lactam and fluoroquinolone antibiotics).</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk of bias: </strong>Assessment of risk of bias included Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool.</p><p><strong>Methods of data synthesis: </strong>We assessed the overall themes of the included studies and classified them into epidemiological, mortality, or antibiotic effectiveness/efficacy studies. Semiquantitative results among studies evaluating the prevalence of resistant bacterial isolates and mortality were reported. We propose a 'DTR index' (DTRi) that extends beyond gram-negative bacteria and complements DTR by estimating national proportions of bacterial isolates resistant to all first-line antibiotics available specifically in that country.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DTR was utilized in 57 studies spanning 94 countries. The DTR definition was predominantly applied unmodified and retained prognostic utility in 70% of studies. The variability in access to first-line antibiotics and emergence of newer agents across countries and over time influence practical treatment options that cannot be captured by 'fixed' DTR definitions underscoring the value of the proposed DTRi.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DTRi could appraise the clinical impact of introducing new agents in a country, identify hot zones of resistance-access imbalance, and optimize resource allocation to improve antibiotic resistance outcomes, especially in under-resourced populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a difficult-to-treat resistance index to gauge imbalance between countries' antibiotic resistance prevalence and access to antibiotics: a scoping review and concept proposal.\",\"authors\":\"Morgan K Walker, Emad A Chishti, Christina Yek, Sadia Sarzynski, Sahil Angelo, Jennifer Cohn, Alicia A Livinski, Sameer S Kadri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inferring the impact of antimicrobial resistance on patient outcomes is challenging, given the variability in antibiotic access across countries and over time. By denoting resistance to all highly safe and effective antibiotics, the difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) definition offers a framework for such assessments globally.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to conduct a scoping review to understand the international adoption, scalability, and prognostic utility of DTR and enable solutions to incorporate antibiotic access into the DTR framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data sources: Data sources included Agricola, Embase, Global Index Medicus, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science: BIOSIS and Core Collection.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Study eligibility criteria included original research publications occurring after January 2018 using the term 'difficult-to-treat resistance' to describe antimicrobial-resistant bacterial isolates demonstrating resistance to all first-line antibiotics (i.e. all β-lactam and fluoroquinolone antibiotics).</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk of bias: </strong>Assessment of risk of bias included Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool.</p><p><strong>Methods of data synthesis: </strong>We assessed the overall themes of the included studies and classified them into epidemiological, mortality, or antibiotic effectiveness/efficacy studies. Semiquantitative results among studies evaluating the prevalence of resistant bacterial isolates and mortality were reported. We propose a 'DTR index' (DTRi) that extends beyond gram-negative bacteria and complements DTR by estimating national proportions of bacterial isolates resistant to all first-line antibiotics available specifically in that country.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DTR was utilized in 57 studies spanning 94 countries. The DTR definition was predominantly applied unmodified and retained prognostic utility in 70% of studies. The variability in access to first-line antibiotics and emergence of newer agents across countries and over time influence practical treatment options that cannot be captured by 'fixed' DTR definitions underscoring the value of the proposed DTRi.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DTRi could appraise the clinical impact of introducing new agents in a country, identify hot zones of resistance-access imbalance, and optimize resource allocation to improve antibiotic resistance outcomes, especially in under-resourced populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.029\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:考虑到各国和不同时期抗生素获取的差异,推断抗菌素耐药性对患者预后的影响具有挑战性。通过表示对所有高度安全和有效抗生素的耐药性,难以治疗耐药性(DTR)定义为全球此类评估提供了一个框架。目的:开展范围审查,以了解DTR的国际采用、可扩展性和预后效用,并使解决方案能够将抗生素获取纳入DTR框架。方法数据来源:Agricola、Embase、Global Index Medicus、PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science: BIOSIS和Core Collection。研究资格标准:2018年1月以后发表的原始研究出版物,使用“难以治疗的耐药性”一词来描述对所有一线抗生素(即所有β-内酰胺和氟喹诺酮类抗生素)具有耐药性的抗微生物细菌分离株。偏见风险评估:乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具。数据综合方法:我们评估了纳入研究的总体主题,并将其分为流行病学、死亡率或抗生素有效性/疗效研究。在评估耐药细菌分离株的流行率和死亡率的研究中,报告了半定量结果。我们提出了一个“DTR指数”(DTRi),它超越了革兰氏阴性菌,并通过估计该国对所有一线抗生素具有耐药性的细菌分离株的国家比例来补充DTR。结果:在94个国家的57项研究中使用了DTR。在70%的研究中,DTR定义主要未经修改地应用并保留了预后效用。一线抗生素的可及性和新药物的出现在各国之间以及随着时间的推移存在差异,影响了“固定的” DTRi定义无法涵盖的实际治疗方案,这突出了拟议的DTRi的价值。结论:DTRi可以评估在一个国家引入新药的临床影响,确定耐药-可及性不平衡的热区,优化资源配置,以改善抗生素耐药结局,特别是在资源不足的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using a difficult-to-treat resistance index to gauge imbalance between countries' antibiotic resistance prevalence and access to antibiotics: a scoping review and concept proposal.

Background: Inferring the impact of antimicrobial resistance on patient outcomes is challenging, given the variability in antibiotic access across countries and over time. By denoting resistance to all highly safe and effective antibiotics, the difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) definition offers a framework for such assessments globally.

Objectives: This study aims to conduct a scoping review to understand the international adoption, scalability, and prognostic utility of DTR and enable solutions to incorporate antibiotic access into the DTR framework.

Methods: Data sources: Data sources included Agricola, Embase, Global Index Medicus, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science: BIOSIS and Core Collection.

Study eligibility criteria: Study eligibility criteria included original research publications occurring after January 2018 using the term 'difficult-to-treat resistance' to describe antimicrobial-resistant bacterial isolates demonstrating resistance to all first-line antibiotics (i.e. all β-lactam and fluoroquinolone antibiotics).

Assessment of risk of bias: Assessment of risk of bias included Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool.

Methods of data synthesis: We assessed the overall themes of the included studies and classified them into epidemiological, mortality, or antibiotic effectiveness/efficacy studies. Semiquantitative results among studies evaluating the prevalence of resistant bacterial isolates and mortality were reported. We propose a 'DTR index' (DTRi) that extends beyond gram-negative bacteria and complements DTR by estimating national proportions of bacterial isolates resistant to all first-line antibiotics available specifically in that country.

Results: DTR was utilized in 57 studies spanning 94 countries. The DTR definition was predominantly applied unmodified and retained prognostic utility in 70% of studies. The variability in access to first-line antibiotics and emergence of newer agents across countries and over time influence practical treatment options that cannot be captured by 'fixed' DTR definitions underscoring the value of the proposed DTRi.

Conclusions: The DTRi could appraise the clinical impact of introducing new agents in a country, identify hot zones of resistance-access imbalance, and optimize resource allocation to improve antibiotic resistance outcomes, especially in under-resourced populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信