智能手机应用程序对三家三级医院适当抗生素处方的影响一项国际性、多中心的楔形步进群随机试验。

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ramzy I Helou, Gaud Catho, Lisa Faxén, Marlies Hulscher, Steven Teerenstra, John Conly, Benedikt D Huttner, Thomas Tängdén, Annelies Verbon
{"title":"智能手机应用程序对三家三级医院适当抗生素处方的影响一项国际性、多中心的楔形步进群随机试验。","authors":"Ramzy I Helou, Gaud Catho, Lisa Faxén, Marlies Hulscher, Steven Teerenstra, John Conly, Benedikt D Huttner, Thomas Tängdén, Annelies Verbon","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Smartphone applications (apps) for antibiotic prescribing have been studied in observational studies. Here, we assessed whether the use of a smartphone app increased appropriate antibiotic therapy (AAT) in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An antibiotic stewardship app (Firstline.org) was populated with local guidelines and tested in a stepped-wedged cluster randomized trial in three hospitals in the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. Defined clusters were randomized per hospital for the intervention (use of app) or standard of care. Primary outcome was AAT assessed by chart review in 15 random patients per cluster per intervention period. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes and user analytics. A questionnaire identifying barriers to app use was disseminated. Multivariable multilevel logistic models with time periods as fixed effects to adjust for time trend and treatment as fixed effects were employed to estimate the odds ratio of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve clusters in the Netherlands (1085 patients) were included, 12 in Sweden (362 patients) and 8 in Switzerland (653 patients). Overall, AAT was not increased (2.0% [95% CI, -5.92% to 9.97%]) in the intervention arm compared with control across the three centres. Mean frequency of app use by cluster was associated with an AAT increase (1.9% [95% CI, 1.18-2.62%]) across study centres; 3.2% in the Netherlands (p < 0.01), 2.8% in Switzerland (p < 0.01), and remained similar in Sweden (0.4%; p 0.46). No difference was found for the other secondary outcomes. Main barriers for app use reported in the questionnaire were easily forgetting using the app and having other tools to help prescribing antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overall, the introduction of a stewardship app did not significantly increase AAT, but a prespecified secondary analysis of app use frequency was associated with a small but significant improvement of AAT. Variable uptake of the app, coexisting routes to guidelines and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic during the trial likely had an impact on the results.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, trial number NCT03793946.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a smartphone application for appropriate antibiotic prescribing at three tertiary hospitals: an international, multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ramzy I Helou, Gaud Catho, Lisa Faxén, Marlies Hulscher, Steven Teerenstra, John Conly, Benedikt D Huttner, Thomas Tängdén, Annelies Verbon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Smartphone applications (apps) for antibiotic prescribing have been studied in observational studies. Here, we assessed whether the use of a smartphone app increased appropriate antibiotic therapy (AAT) in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An antibiotic stewardship app (Firstline.org) was populated with local guidelines and tested in a stepped-wedged cluster randomized trial in three hospitals in the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. Defined clusters were randomized per hospital for the intervention (use of app) or standard of care. Primary outcome was AAT assessed by chart review in 15 random patients per cluster per intervention period. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes and user analytics. A questionnaire identifying barriers to app use was disseminated. Multivariable multilevel logistic models with time periods as fixed effects to adjust for time trend and treatment as fixed effects were employed to estimate the odds ratio of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve clusters in the Netherlands (1085 patients) were included, 12 in Sweden (362 patients) and 8 in Switzerland (653 patients). Overall, AAT was not increased (2.0% [95% CI, -5.92% to 9.97%]) in the intervention arm compared with control across the three centres. Mean frequency of app use by cluster was associated with an AAT increase (1.9% [95% CI, 1.18-2.62%]) across study centres; 3.2% in the Netherlands (p < 0.01), 2.8% in Switzerland (p < 0.01), and remained similar in Sweden (0.4%; p 0.46). No difference was found for the other secondary outcomes. Main barriers for app use reported in the questionnaire were easily forgetting using the app and having other tools to help prescribing antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overall, the introduction of a stewardship app did not significantly increase AAT, but a prespecified secondary analysis of app use frequency was associated with a small but significant improvement of AAT. Variable uptake of the app, coexisting routes to guidelines and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic during the trial likely had an impact on the results.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, trial number NCT03793946.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.026\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在观察性研究中研究了抗生素处方的智能手机应用程序。在这里,我们评估了智能手机应用程序的使用是否增加了医院抗生素治疗(AAT)的适宜性。方法:抗生素管理应用程序(Firstline.org)中填充了当地指南,并在荷兰、瑞典和瑞士的三家医院进行了阶梯式随机分组试验。根据干预(应用程序的使用)或标准护理对每家医院进行随机分组。在每个干预期,每组随机选取15例患者进行AAT评估。次要结局包括临床结局和用户分析。发布了一份确定应用使用障碍的调查问卷。采用多变量多水平logistic模型,以时间段为固定效应来调整时间趋势,以治疗为固定效应来估计治疗的优势比。结果:荷兰12例(1085例),瑞典12例(362例),瑞士8例(653例)。总体而言,与3个中心的对照组相比,干预组的AAT没有增加(2.0% ([95%CI: -5.92至9.97])。在各个研究中心,集群的平均应用程序使用与AAT增加相关(1.9% [95%CI: 1.18 - 2.62]);结论:总体而言,管理应用程序的引入并没有显著增加AAT,但预先指定的应用程序使用频率的二次分析与AAT的小幅但显着改善相关。在试验期间,应用程序的不同接受程度、指导方针的共存途径以及COVID-19大流行的影响可能会对结果产生影响。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,试验号NCT03793946。试验资助:JPIAMR,批准号JPIAMR2017-045。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a smartphone application for appropriate antibiotic prescribing at three tertiary hospitals: an international, multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.

Objectives: Smartphone applications (apps) for antibiotic prescribing have been studied in observational studies. Here, we assessed whether the use of a smartphone app increased appropriate antibiotic therapy (AAT) in hospitals.

Methods: An antibiotic stewardship app (Firstline.org) was populated with local guidelines and tested in a stepped-wedged cluster randomized trial in three hospitals in the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. Defined clusters were randomized per hospital for the intervention (use of app) or standard of care. Primary outcome was AAT assessed by chart review in 15 random patients per cluster per intervention period. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes and user analytics. A questionnaire identifying barriers to app use was disseminated. Multivariable multilevel logistic models with time periods as fixed effects to adjust for time trend and treatment as fixed effects were employed to estimate the odds ratio of treatment.

Results: Twelve clusters in the Netherlands (1085 patients) were included, 12 in Sweden (362 patients) and 8 in Switzerland (653 patients). Overall, AAT was not increased (2.0% [95% CI, -5.92% to 9.97%]) in the intervention arm compared with control across the three centres. Mean frequency of app use by cluster was associated with an AAT increase (1.9% [95% CI, 1.18-2.62%]) across study centres; 3.2% in the Netherlands (p < 0.01), 2.8% in Switzerland (p < 0.01), and remained similar in Sweden (0.4%; p 0.46). No difference was found for the other secondary outcomes. Main barriers for app use reported in the questionnaire were easily forgetting using the app and having other tools to help prescribing antibiotics.

Discussion: Overall, the introduction of a stewardship app did not significantly increase AAT, but a prespecified secondary analysis of app use frequency was associated with a small but significant improvement of AAT. Variable uptake of the app, coexisting routes to guidelines and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic during the trial likely had an impact on the results.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, trial number NCT03793946.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信