Jeffrey D Alexis, Katherine Wood, Igor Gosev, Anas Jawaid, Leway Chen, Anuradha Godishala, Mark Tallman, Sabu Thomas, John Martens, Bronislava Polonsky, Anita Y Chen, Scott McNitt, Saadia Sherazi, Ilan Goldenberg
{"title":"采用心室辅助装置与继续药物治疗的晚期心力衰竭患者的生存和再入院负担","authors":"Jeffrey D Alexis, Katherine Wood, Igor Gosev, Anas Jawaid, Leway Chen, Anuradha Godishala, Mark Tallman, Sabu Thomas, John Martens, Bronislava Polonsky, Anita Y Chen, Scott McNitt, Saadia Sherazi, Ilan Goldenberg","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As questions remain about the risk-benefit of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy, we evaluated the association between LVAD versus medical therapy for the competing risk of all-cause mortality and all-cause readmission. Among consecutive patients evaluated for advanced heart failure (HF) therapy, 260 were referred for LVAD implantation and 292 continued medical therapy in this retrospective, observational database study. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was significantly higher among medically managed patients versus LVAD recipients (37% vs. 25%, p = 0.014). Separation in event rates appeared within 3 months and was sustained throughout follow-up. The cumulative incidence rate of all-cause readmissions at 2 years was higher among LVAD recipients (78% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, compared with medical therapy, LVAD therapy was associated with a significant 35% lower risk of death (p = 0.005), driven by a 57% reduction in the risk of death within the first 3 months (p < 0.001), and a 2.8-fold increased risk of readmission. Among medically managed patients, lower baseline hemoglobin and blood pressure, older age, and increased creatinine were predictors of death. In conclusion, among patients with advanced HF, LVAD therapy was associated with pronounced survival benefit, but a higher 2-year readmission rate compared with medical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival and Readmission Burden in Advanced Heart Failure Patients Managed With Ventricular Assist Device Versus Continued Medical Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey D Alexis, Katherine Wood, Igor Gosev, Anas Jawaid, Leway Chen, Anuradha Godishala, Mark Tallman, Sabu Thomas, John Martens, Bronislava Polonsky, Anita Y Chen, Scott McNitt, Saadia Sherazi, Ilan Goldenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As questions remain about the risk-benefit of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy, we evaluated the association between LVAD versus medical therapy for the competing risk of all-cause mortality and all-cause readmission. Among consecutive patients evaluated for advanced heart failure (HF) therapy, 260 were referred for LVAD implantation and 292 continued medical therapy in this retrospective, observational database study. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was significantly higher among medically managed patients versus LVAD recipients (37% vs. 25%, p = 0.014). Separation in event rates appeared within 3 months and was sustained throughout follow-up. The cumulative incidence rate of all-cause readmissions at 2 years was higher among LVAD recipients (78% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, compared with medical therapy, LVAD therapy was associated with a significant 35% lower risk of death (p = 0.005), driven by a 57% reduction in the risk of death within the first 3 months (p < 0.001), and a 2.8-fold increased risk of readmission. Among medically managed patients, lower baseline hemoglobin and blood pressure, older age, and increased creatinine were predictors of death. In conclusion, among patients with advanced HF, LVAD therapy was associated with pronounced survival benefit, but a higher 2-year readmission rate compared with medical management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002382\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗的风险-收益问题仍然存在,我们评估了LVAD与药物治疗之间全因死亡率和全因再入院风险的竞争关系。在这项回顾性、观察性的数据库研究中,在评估为晚期心力衰竭(HF)治疗的连续患者中,260例被转诊为LVAD植入,292例继续接受药物治疗。2年后,医学治疗患者的全因死亡率明显高于LVAD接受者(37% vs. 25%, p = 0.014)。事件发生率的分离出现在3个月内,并在整个随访期间持续。LVAD受者2年全因再入院的累积发生率更高(78% vs. 40%, p < 0.001)。在多因素分析中,与药物治疗相比,LVAD治疗与死亡风险显著降低35% (p = 0.005)相关,这是由于前3个月内死亡风险降低57% (p < 0.001),再入院风险增加2.8倍。在医疗管理的患者中,较低的基线血红蛋白和血压、年龄较大和肌酐升高是死亡的预测因子。总之,在晚期心衰患者中,LVAD治疗与明显的生存获益相关,但与药物治疗相比,2年再入院率更高。
Survival and Readmission Burden in Advanced Heart Failure Patients Managed With Ventricular Assist Device Versus Continued Medical Therapy.
As questions remain about the risk-benefit of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy, we evaluated the association between LVAD versus medical therapy for the competing risk of all-cause mortality and all-cause readmission. Among consecutive patients evaluated for advanced heart failure (HF) therapy, 260 were referred for LVAD implantation and 292 continued medical therapy in this retrospective, observational database study. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was significantly higher among medically managed patients versus LVAD recipients (37% vs. 25%, p = 0.014). Separation in event rates appeared within 3 months and was sustained throughout follow-up. The cumulative incidence rate of all-cause readmissions at 2 years was higher among LVAD recipients (78% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, compared with medical therapy, LVAD therapy was associated with a significant 35% lower risk of death (p = 0.005), driven by a 57% reduction in the risk of death within the first 3 months (p < 0.001), and a 2.8-fold increased risk of readmission. Among medically managed patients, lower baseline hemoglobin and blood pressure, older age, and increased creatinine were predictors of death. In conclusion, among patients with advanced HF, LVAD therapy was associated with pronounced survival benefit, but a higher 2-year readmission rate compared with medical management.
期刊介绍:
ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world.
The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.